A question or two about "Japan People Search"

johnnyG

Sempai
Donor
Fifteen-year veteran
Joined
23 Dec 2010
Messages
3,144
Reaction score
5,057
How does anyone distinguish between a more legitimate inquiry, and providing information that will aid a stalker (or worse)?

In spite of posts tugging at heartstrings, don't people also have a right to privacy? Even internet companies allow you (with some difficulty) to reclaim your data--the data they have on you. The right to be forgotten.
 
I think about the repercussions of a search for bad reasons or a successful search causing major problems for someone , but over the years here , it seems like only about a 1% chance of a JREF search working. I would hope if someone is found and contacted , they would be asked if they want to be found and their negative answer would be honored.
 
In spite of posts tugging at heartstrings, don't people also have a right to privacy? Even internet companies allow you (with some difficulty) to reclaim your data--the data they have on you. The right to be forgotten.

As far as I know, we have honoured any request to delete personal identifiable information (PII). We proactively delete data deemed too personal (phone numbers, addresses, etc.).


How does anyone distinguish between a more legitimate inquiry, and providing information that will aid a stalker (or worse)?

Most threads in this subforum involve cases where people look for their biological fathers, former colleagues, friends, or classmates. Whether such requests are legitimate or not, no one can tell, but I would assume that if someone does not want to be found, they will simply opt not to respond.
 
It's a valid concern to have... I don't usually engage the people search threads because the odds of success are not good and usually there's little to no information to go on, so it's like being asked for directions and sent a photo of a wall at the end of an alley.

Recently I had some rare success tracking someone down and realized I was in too deep before I had even bothered to ask the OP for their motive in searching for the person. I guess the original request didn't raise any red flags, since they were looking for someone who they lost track of decades ago, and it didn't come across as anything creepy or untoward, at least from the request itself. All of the information I found about the person was publicly available and relatively easy to find for anyone who knew what to search for, and it seems unlikely for someone hiding from a stalker to post personally identifiable and contact information publicly online. In the end, a general location and an e-mail address were produced, though it remains to be seen whether the information was still any good. And as thomas mentioned, if the person didn't want contact they are not obligated to reply, and that would be the end of it.

I do have a tendency to take people at their word and assume they're acting in good faith, but I acknowledge that a good enough liar with nefarious goals could probably trick people into unintentionally helping them. I actually eye the "looking for a family member" threads with greater suspicion than someone trying to find an old school friend or colleague they've lost track of, because it seems like someone who abandons their family would be doing it for some reason, good or bad, and made a conscious decision not to be a part of their lives.
 
It's a valid concern to have... I don't usually engage the people search threads because the odds of success are not good and usually there's little to no information to go on, so it's like being asked for directions and sent a photo of a wall at the end of an alley.

Recently I had some rare success tracking someone down and realized I was in too deep before I had even bothered to ask the OP for their motive in searching for the person. I guess the original request didn't raise any red flags, since they were looking for someone who they lost track of decades ago, and it didn't come across as anything creepy or untoward, at least from the request itself. All of the information I found about the person was publicly available and relatively easy to find for anyone who knew what to search for, and it seems unlikely for someone hiding from a stalker to post personally identifiable and contact information publicly online. In the end, a general location and an e-mail address were produced, though it remains to be seen whether the information was still any good. And as thomas mentioned, if the person didn't want contact they are not obligated to reply, and that would be the end of it.

I do have a tendency to take people at their word and assume they're acting in good faith, but I acknowledge that a good enough liar with nefarious goals could probably trick people into unintentionally helping them. I actually eye the "looking for a family member" threads with greater suspicion than someone trying to find an old school friend or colleague they've lost track of, because it seems like someone who abandons their family would be doing it for some reason, good or bad, and made a conscious decision not to be a part of their lives.


1 - Google street view is awesome for that! A colleague was looking for the location that a photo of Mt. Fuji was taken. Using some clues in the foreground I found the street and location that it was taken. I also found that the side of Mt. Fuji was wrong and, again using street view, found the location that the second image was taken. It was a pretty good Photoshop otherwise. Well at least I think it was, Mt. Fuji doesn't rotate right? ;P

2 - NC

3 - It could also be that the parent the child was with cut off contact with the other parent and prevented any contact between the child and parent. Its sad but we have seen a few examples of this. Usually its the other way around though, with the child being with the Japanese parent and a foreign parent being alienated. If someone came here trying to track down their kid in japan, well it would be sad but I wouldn't be disinclined to believe them right off the bat. :(
 
1 - Google street view is awesome for that! A colleague was looking for the location that a photo of Mt. Fuji was taken. Using some clues in the foreground I found the street and location that it was taken. I also found that the side of Mt. Fuji was wrong and, again using street view, found the location that the second image was taken. It was a pretty good Photoshop otherwise. Well at least I think it was, Mt. Fuji doesn't rotate right? ;P
OK this is off-topic, but @Petaris, are you familiar with Geoguessr? I guess there are some streamers who use this and are able to pinpoint places all over the world with surprising accuracy: GeoGuessr - Let's explore the world!
3 - It could also be that the parent the child was with cut off contact with the other parent and prevented any contact between the child and parent. Its sad but we have seen a few examples of this. Usually its the other way around though, with the child being with the Japanese parent and a foreign parent being alienated. If someone came here trying to track down their kid in japan, well it would be sad but I wouldn't be disinclined to believe them right off the bat. :(
Yes, although without looking, I can't recall many instances of people using the people search to find their estranged/abducted children. I think in many of those cases, they know the whereabouts of their kids, but they are out of reach because of Japan's laws, and the other parent would stymie any efforts to contact the children. From what I can remember, a lot of the requests seem to be from adults living abroad, looking for a long-lost Japanese parent.
 
Back
Top Bottom