The reading part is the worst, but with sufficient practice of past exams.....
For those who aren't taking the test, is there a particular reason for that - like an alternate test, disinterest or what?
For those who aren't taking the test, is there a particular reason for that - like an alternate test, disinterest or what?
I've only heard of the JLPT. Are there any other tests worth considering - how do they compare and what differences are there?
Yes, but those don't give bragging rights, which often seems to be a prime concern among JLPT/英検 takers.Well, besides the JLPT, which is an international official test, u can take Japanese lessons and have tests too...(which are given out by the teacher of cuz
RE: Mikecash --reading Japanese isn't all that fun. At least for me. Try and try as I might, I find it much more interesting to read something in my native tongue. Even as my reading speed and comprehension grow.
十人十色かなぁ~
J-Test のことは聞いた事がないです。やっぱり挑戦してみるのはいいことですが、I think most folks understand that the JLPT, while it looks good on a resume, etc., is not a very good gauge of one's Japanese skill. I have heard that J-Test, is actually better in that regard. I'm planning to try it out after I finish 2級, but we shall see. Anyone already taken the J-Test?
kooo;391116 said:I'm just wondering, why do people take the test below level 2? I know level 2 or above is useful for job applications (most jobs require proof that you're 2Q or above, as you know).
I hope to be ready for the 4th test in a year... ( if that is possible)
I have applied at many Japanese companies, have always included 2Q among my qualifications on my 履歴書, and have yet to encounter a single person at any company who had ever even heard of the JLPT.
Oh excuse me. It's just whenever I look at Gaijinpot and such sites I see classified ads that say things like "JLPT Level 2 or Higher Required" and I incorrectly assumed it was a common thing.
Man, stupid comments like this p!ss me off. People who have passed level 2 or 1 love to "question" those who are just getting into their studies. I guess it's some sort of superiority thing. I did level 4 last year and I'm glad I did. I'm doing level 3 this year and I'm glad I am. It just gives some sort of formalised recognition for all the hard work. Saying that it's a waste of time is like saying that exams for primary school students are a waste of time.I'm just wondering, why do people take the test below level 2? I know level 2 or above is useful for job applications (most jobs require proof that you're 2Q or above, as you know).
Is it just for fun?