strike a deal

hirashin

Sempai
Donor
Joined
8 Apr 2004
Messages
2,721
Reaction score
63
I have another question from a college entrance examination.

I'm sorry to post a long passage. I'm not sure about the usage of
the idiom "strike a deal", which is in the fifth paragraph.

Would someone explain it? With whom does the author want to
"strike a deal"? New York City?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 I have no doubt that a large number of American lawyers do wonderfully worthwhile things. But the trouble is that there are just too many of them. In fact, the U.S. has more lawyers than all the rest of the world put together. The U.S. now boasts 346 lawyers for every 100,000 citizens. Britain, by contrast, has 196; Japan a mere 22.
2 Every year over 90 million lawsuits are filed in the U.S., and many of these are what might simply be called ambitious. Two parents in Texas are suing a high school baseball coach for benching their son during a game. In Washington State, a man with heart problems is suing local milk companies ツ"because their milk did not warn him about cholesterol.ツ"
3 Along with the idea that lawsuits are a quick way to a fortune, there is the interesting and uniquely American notion that no matter what happens, someone else must be responsible. So if, say, you smoke eighty cigarettes a day for fifty years and eventually get cancer, then it must be everyone else's fault but your own, and you sue just about everybody involved in making and selling cigarettes.
4 The cost of all this to society is enormous. New York City alone spends $200 million a year settling ツ"slip and fallツ" claims - people tripping over the edge of a sidewalk, and the like. According to a recent TV documentary, because of the ever-growing legal costs, consumers in the U.S. pay $500 more than they need to for every car they buy, $100 more for football helmets, and $3,000 more for heart pacemakers. They even pay a little extra for haircuts, because several customers successfully sued their barbers after being given the sort of embarrassing haircut I receive as a matter of routine.
5 All of which has given me an idea. I am going to smoke eighty cigarettes a day and slip and fall on a New York sidewalk while drinking high-cholesterol milk, and then I'll call a lawyer and see if we can strike a deal. I don't expect to settle for less than $2.5 billion ツ― and that's before we've even started to talk about my latest haircut.


Thanks in advance.

Hirashin
 
Thanks for the input, Half-n-half.

Does the author want to make a deal with New York City?

Hirashin
 
Would someone explain it? With whom does the author want to
"strike a deal"? New York City?
Author does not know yet whom he want to sue, but he has brilliant plan:

1) he is going to smoke 80 cigarettes a day - so he will have opportunity to get cancer and sue tobacco company.
2) he is hoing to drink fat milk - so he will have opportunity to get some heart problems and sue milk farm.
3) he is going to slip and fall on New Yourk sidewalk - so he will have opportunity to sue New York city.

So, he is going to do #1, #2 and #3 and he will call a lawyer after to discuss if he could "file lawsuit" against these three "tobacco company", "milk farm" or "New York". He is planning to make $2.5 billion before he will do haircut (another potential lawsuit).

That is sarcastic piece of art, which was written in late 70-ies, I think so because it's style. :)

Another thing "make a deal" is not appropriate here, and "strike a deal" is more correct in that situation. Think about it as about "making first strike" or "hit them first"

Just 2C
 
Thanks for your help, ewww.

That is sarcastic piece of art, which was written in late 70-ies, I think so because it's style. :)

Another thing "make a deal" is not appropriate here, and "strike a deal" is more correct in that situation. Think about it as about "making first strike"

Just 2C

How do you know it was written in late 70's? Has the situation about lawsuits in the US
changed much?

I'm not sure what you mean "Think about it as about "making first strike". Would you
please explain it?

Hirashin
 
Another thing "make a deal" is not appropriate here, and "strike a deal" is more correct in that situation. Think about it as about "making first strike" or "hit them first"

Just 2C

"Make a deal" is perfectly appropriate insofar as it has the same meaning. Stylistically "strike a deal" may fit better overall with the paragraph but in my mind the meanings are the same.

It actually looks like it was written in the late 90's by Bill Bryson.
 
>> How do you know it was written in late 70's?

Some words and phrases here are most suitable for John Wayne, "strike a deal" for example. First cigarettes and cholesterol lawsuits were filed somewhere in late 70. Author show these lawsuits as something new and unexpectable ridiculous.

>> Has the situation about lawsuits in the US changed much?

I have no idea about it, cuz it is far from my interests. I know that we have some special laws in the state of Maryland, which suppose to reduce amount of similar lawsuits. For example, Your health insurance company should pay medical expenses after car accident - that is a law now, and You can not sue automobile company for broken leg or hand anymore, so amount of lawsuits to automobile insurance companies reduced dramatically.

>> what you mean "Think about it as about "making first strike".

That easy. To make first strike You should do two easy things: close distance and strike. Making first stike has another side: You should be desperate to do it, and that is a most hard thing.

hirashin>> BTW, sorry for unclear comments. Apparently, in that context, "strike a deal" means "to start a new lawsuit(s)"
 
Last edited:
Do not forget the lawyer part of the story also.

It hints toward the lawyer becoming part of the plan of fake/false law suits. Many lawyers would see the plan to sue big companies under doubtful circumstances as illegal and turn down the case. The man planning to sue everyone would have to find a lawyer who is a bit shady to Strike/make a deal with. Sometimes such lawyers are called "ambulance chasers". Most of the time they sue just to make money for themselves and not their client. If you were using a lawyer like that. you would want to set down and "make/strike a deal" on how much each will get(money) if the law suit is won. Probably the lawyer would want 80% of the money and the client would get 20%.
So first the man would have to find a shady lawyer who would file such a law suit and then make/strike a deal on how to split the profits afterwoods.

just my personal thoughts on the story---don't accept as true facts

Uncle Frank
 
Back
Top Bottom