- 28 Jul 2005
- 5,238
- 172
If I may here, just for a little highlighting:
I Would much more so tend to reason that there is very little connection between the Egyptian trinity of Horus, Osiris, and Isis, the older desert god, Set (or later Seth) and the later development of the Hebrew satan. Also, I would have to do some more research on the matter, but I'm under the impression that full blown mythical analogies of light .vs. dark as representations of good .vs. evil is not that old, and not that widespread.
Kali (or khali, meaning black or dark in Sanskrit) is actually from Hinduism, and is a consort to Shiva. Is it that that god-model may have slipped into Tibetan theology somewhere along the way? Earliest descriptions (the Pali texts) on the other hand do not seem to present Buddhism as having any model or character which would fit either the Jewish or the Christian satan, where as some later sects of Buddhism do.
I Would much more so tend to reason that there is very little connection between the Egyptian trinity of Horus, Osiris, and Isis, the older desert god, Set (or later Seth) and the later development of the Hebrew satan. Also, I would have to do some more research on the matter, but I'm under the impression that full blown mythical analogies of light .vs. dark as representations of good .vs. evil is not that old, and not that widespread.
Kali (or khali, meaning black or dark in Sanskrit) is actually from Hinduism, and is a consort to Shiva. Is it that that god-model may have slipped into Tibetan theology somewhere along the way? Earliest descriptions (the Pali texts) on the other hand do not seem to present Buddhism as having any model or character which would fit either the Jewish or the Christian satan, where as some later sects of Buddhism do.