Indeed keigo is very confusing, even for the natives!
ใใใ โ ใใ ใใ honorific for the person you're talking about
ใใใ โ ใใใ ใ humbing yourself to lower than the person you're talking about.
ๆใใฆใใใๅ ็ใใจใๆใใฆใใใๅ ็ใใฎ้ใใฏใๅใซใTeacher that is received from, from the outgroup perspective/ Teacher that gives, receiver is speaker or someone close to them, from the ingroup perspective ใฎ้ใใงใใใใญใ
If the speaker is the teacher or one identified with him ใๆใใฆใใใๅ ็ใใจใใ้ขจใซใชใใใชใใใ
this was quoted from a letter from an anime. my question is if ้ ใใ is humble, wouldn't ๅ ฅใใใ and ๅ่ฒ ใใชใใ be ambiguously used , since both are informal?
and can someone explain this? it appears from the webpage:
ๅฉใใใใ = ๅฉใใฃใ
ๆฑบใใใใ = ๆฑบใพใฃใ
้ใใใใ = ้ใพใฃใ
so what about the transitive and intransitive part?
ๅใคใฎๅฎใฏ็งใ้ ใใ
ๆๅพใฎไธใคใ็ใฎๅญๅฎ่ฒใใฉใกใใๅ ใซๆใซๅ ฅใใใ
ใใใใจๅ่ฒ ใใชใใ
this was quoted from a letter from an anime. my question is if ้ ใใ is humble, wouldn't ๅ ฅใใใ and ๅ่ฒ ใใชใใ be ambiguously used , since both are informal
้ ใใ indicates a relationship to the person the treasures were received from, not who is being addressed in the present...so I really don't get your question.
it appears from the webpage:
ๅฉใใใใ = ๅฉใใฃใ
ๆฑบใใใใ = ๆฑบใพใฃใ
้ใใใใ = ้ใพใฃใ
so what about the transitive and intransitive part?
้ ใใ indicates a relationship to the person the treasures were received from, not who is being addressed in the present...so I really don't get your question.
ๅใคใฎๅฎใฏ็งใ้ ใใ
ๆๅพใฎไธใคใ็ใฎๅญๅฎ่ฒใใฉใกใใๅ ใซๆใซๅ ฅใใใ
ใใใใจๅ่ฒ ใใชใใ
this was quoted from a letter from an anime. my question is if ้ ใใ is humble, wouldn't ๅ ฅใใใ and ๅ่ฒ ใใชใใ be ambiguously used , since both are informal?
้ ใ is certainly humble form but has extended in usage to mean "get (in gamble, game, etc.)" with hint of courtesy to the loser(s).
An example of this usage is:
ใใฎใฒใผใ ใฏใใใ ใ๏ผ (I'm winning this game--this does not mean that you are "getting" the game as an object)
ๅ ฅใใ is just part of the phrase ๆใซๅ ฅใใ (get; obtain)
ๆใซๅ ฅใใ and ๅ่ฒ ใใชใใ are not in humble form because the outcome of the race (of getting the treasure) is still unknown (i.e., no need to show courtesy).
and can someone explain this? it appears from the webpage:
ๅฉใใใใ = ๅฉใใฃใ
ๆฑบใใใใ = ๆฑบใพใฃใ
้ใใใใ = ้ใพใฃใ
so what about the transitive and intransitive part?
The difference between the two groups lies in the meaning.
ๅฉใใใใใๆฑบใใใใใ้ใใใใ are used when the speaker is consciously aware of the known or unknown person/entity that performed the action--that "one had been saved by a person or persons," "decision had been made by someone" and "something was closed by somebody." It can also suggest that execution of the action in question was beyond the speaker's control.
Hence, the second group simply describes the action, with no mention or awareness of who executed the action.
The two can be used synonymously in most cases, I think.
If you're looking for delicate difference between the two, "te ni ireru" implies "obtaining an object by employing some means (specified or otherwise in context)," while "te ni suru" describes only "obtaining an object" without mention of means or effort to get it.