Firstly, I believe the meaning is heard through the use of the particle と and not directly related to the tari suru form. と tends to be used for "when" rather than "if" outcomes and for conditions that occur repeatedly or invariably. Therefore I understand the differences in your Japanese examples and would say it is closer to sentence #1.Thanks.
Thanks.
What I wanted to know is if that expression 友達が来たらすると、means by itself (I mean, "necessarily") that he/she has already been in my house before.
"When he comes to my house, there's no enough place to sit". ( ? )
Or
"If he would come..." , "if it were the case that he..... ?. ( ? )
友達が来たりすると also sounds better to me as 友達がくると unless there are analogous activities to "coming" (doing other things like....). The fact of not having a place to sit may be rather limited to the friend first coming, though..
友達が来たりすると座る所もない
Thank you, undrentide san ! I tried asking my b/f about the friend aspect and he became quite offended at the prospect of inviting anyone outside of your closest relations over to a narrow apartment without a place for them to sit down. When I made some joke about not wanting anyone other than a friend to stay long, he started accusing me of having a different culture and very firmly suggested that this grammar could not be separated from our ways of thinking and that this topic be closed, NOW !It could be either about talking about the past experience or hypothetical situation. The point is that the problem is lack of space, not the visity by friend itself.
そうですか。知りませんでしたよ!もっと硬い言い方は 何でしょうか。「~やら」ですか。~たりするはどちらかというと話し言葉なので、かたい 言い方ではありません。
そうですか。知りませんでしたよ!もっと硬い言い方は 何でしょうか。「~やら」ですか。
That's used in the similar sense to the original usage of "~tari, ~tari", that is, it shows "warau" is one of the examples.and why -tari suru can be used in this kind of situation ?
"I don't laugh or the such beside you." (As you can see in my reply above.;-))Tonari de warattari shinai (without de) > what should it be translated to ?