Yes I am but I am trying to grasp the meaning of causative, passive etc. From the English meanings, I know you have often told me not to try to translate directly from English but not sure of another way.You'd have a much easier time grasping all this if you weren't trying to grasp too many thing at once and way too early in your studies to boot. Aren't you using a textbook?
So 壊れる is an intransitive verb.
And it doesn't need a direct object. It uses the が subject marker.
今まで、水で電子機器が壊れません。
Is that the same as
今まで、水で壊れている電子機器がありません?
Thank you killerinsideesan,Considering what you wrote in the post above (explaining the storm situation); I don't think you'd want to use "今まで", maybe use something like 今のところ. 「今のところ、水で壊れている電子機器はありません。」. Keep in mind that if you were to report some information to the "higher-ups", you would pneed to say/write it in a bit more polite way, but I wouldn't like to confuse you further with that if you're early in your studies.
Hi mikesan,You're doing the right thing, contemplating "what-if" situations and how you'd handle them. It's great practice for real life.
But can you think of some ways you could report that there is no damage using only grammar points you have already learned? It can be done; give it a try.
Now this is tricky for me.The reader/listener doesn't get information that you are worrying about the equipment from that sentence. You give up telling it, then?
今のところ電子機器は水の影響を受けません.
Understandable, but should be 受けていません
Yes that's right if I was asked "is the equipment alright?"
はい大丈夫です。
But if I'm asked what's happening?
水が天井から漏れているだけど
今のところ電子機器は水の影響を受けていません.
Very close, but ~だけど can't be attached to verbs or i-adjectives.水が天井から漏れているだけど
今のところ電子機器は水の影響を受けていません.
Yeah sorry I quite forgot.Nothing?