If such is the case . . .
bossel said:
Er..., from the FAQ:
"What Are Moderators?
Moderators oversee specific forums. They generally have the ability to edit and delete posts, move threads, and perform other manipulations."
kirei_na_me said:
Yes, we have the ability to edit posts if we see fit. That's in the job description.
Sensuikan San said:
It's usually a matter of potential legal liability ... which can involve name-calling approaching slander (when the "victim" can be identified), profanity, obscenity etc. etc.
The post in question was a single link, made without any additional comment. I did so on purpose, because I felt just having the link by itself made a powerful comment. The post was edited to include the comment:
From Mandylion - I loved Patrick Lee's comment (first one after all the pictures)
1) I don't think Mandylion had ill intent in mind when he did this (I like Mandylion, too, btw!); just to be clear up front, this is not about whether or not I think Mandylion is a good person/admin (which I think he is, and I know no one is saying that I have said otherwise). But, I disagree strongly with anyone having the ability to edit my posts at will, be they admins or not!
2) Sometimes, people read over a post quickly and don't see everything; in this case, I felt that some people may not realize that Mandylion had added commentary and have thought that I had written the commentary. Mainly, in this case, because I am not sure everyone is aware that admins can add to posts like that (I wasn't!). In other words, if my posts can be edited by someone else, I am concerned that I may be accidentally thought to have written something that I didn't. I have enough of a time debating what I do say with people without the potential of having to debate what someone may think I said with an admin's edit.
3) As I said, if I write something inappropriate ("potential legal liability"), delete it, or let me know about it. If I cannot edit it to meet submission rules, then I don't mind having it deleted.
4) If these are the rules, then I disagree with them, and must seriously consider if I want to continue membership/participation if I must accept the risk of being edited over without consent to participate.
This came as a total shock to me. I suppose that if this is made clear in the agreement part of signing up, then I should have read and considered more carefully. I am sorry that I did not do so.
If I had written something over the top, I might be more receptive to what happened (like if I had written, "BLEEP you, you BLEEPING BLEEP BLEEPS! I'll BLEEPING BLEEP you in the BLEEP BLEEP, and if you don't like it, you can BLEEP my BLEEP!"). But, it does not seem that my post was edited for content, but that Mandylion was simply replying to my post
within the post itself.
Also, how often does this occur? Do the admins keep a record of how many posts they edit without asking, the type of posts that are edited, and whose posts are edited? I would be very curious to know.
But, again, I guess what I am finding out is that that is the way the rules are and I can either accept them or leave. Regretfully, I have to say that is fair; this is not my forum, so I need to accept that I don't make the rules. BUt, wow, talk about a disheartening surprise . . .