duff_o_josh said:
ah i realize i cant argue with you guys, sorry. a shame, what a shame
visual kei came from angura kei which was influenced heavily by traditional japan. visual kei encorporates gothic attributes into itself along with metal and industrial. most people in japan who like this music dress as a gothic lolita. so i am not far off saying that it was gothic. look at shibuya kei
noob :smoke:
Uh-uh...Whatever you say.
Newbie - Wikipedia
None of those, as to my knowledge, fit me whatsoever, nor do the other uses for the term. Except the so-called 'n00b talk' that people use to make fan of illiterates. I do that all the time, however, I'm not doing it here, so it doesn't even come close to applying, let alone insulting either.
Anyway, with that out of the way, got proof of this please and thank you? Going by what I've heard from 'real' goths, 'tis the music, not the looks that make one gothic, so, thusly...
Oh! And, lastly, let's say I have this horse stallion...And his DNA was 'influenced' by many different breeds, one tiny bit having been from the Brabant breed. Would that make him a Brabant then? Going by what you said, apparently it does indeed...
lastmagi said:
As I've said before, posts like that get pushed back and ignored. Once more you ignore my point, and oversimplify. It's not THAT there are no threads that I want to see, it's that the general atmosphere of the forum makes it not conducive to other kinds of discussions.
The only reason I don't respond to them is because I have absolutely
nothing to say about them. I don't know the bands, let alone do I know any information about them. Simple as that.
Here you refused to respond to my point in a reasonable manner. You don't provide your arguments in a level-headed way, and you just attack. It's this kind of superficial commentary that makes many Jmusic threads degenerative. Kindly read my posts and respond to the points in an adult manner.
No, actually, I just find your argument to be bad. All it seems to consist of is an opinion that doesn't get backed up by anything and 'refer to so-and-so part of whatever post I made here', which is indeed not a good argument in the slightest way possible. But that just may be my oh-so screwed up way of thinking. Silly me.
But the fact is that you generalized. One person could have said it, two could have said it, ten people could have said it in the forum, but that won't be representative of the whole population.
Get over it. I'm not going to go '(well, a lot of them anyway apparently)' after each thing I say. When I generalize I kind of expect people to to get what I'm saying, as in the apparent majority. Sorry, my bad. Must
still giving
the general population of people too much credit then...
And there. I didn't generalize there. Happy now?
Er. I would like to warn you that I am quite capable of reading what is implicit in statements. Even so, the quote that I specifically referenced for you to review, and which I will show here again was:
So yes, I suppose it was a good try. Moving along.
No...Last time I checked, the human body isn't art. And there are different types of beauty too (not to mention art as well). So, thusly, all I could possibly be saying is that they are being ignorant about just one aspect of beauty and 'art' because of a reason that, as to my knowledge, is kind of stupid.
So nope, nope! Still not a very good try at all!
Sorry, I chuckled at this part. This obviously points out that you don't know that GQ stands for Gentlemen's Quarterly. If we go look it up on wiki:
Thus you made a false assumption which ultimately undermined what you said.
Precisely! FASHION and STYLE! Not the beauty of the models. So, yes, I made a bit of an assumption, but I don't find it incorrect whatsoever.
Sure, who am I to say that these people don't like the makeup? But is it overdone sometimes? Yes. Does it get boring after a while? Yes. Will we grow out of it someday? Yes. Do I really care as much about the makeup themselves as much as the overzealous emphasis artists and fans (mind you, not all) put on it? Not really.
Is it over-done sometomes? Nope. Does it get boring after a while? Nope. Will some of us grow out of it eventually? Possibly, although not I.
'Tis an opinion that cannot be right or wrong.
I refer you to the sentence immediately after the one you quoted.
Again, YOUR opinion. MY opinion. Neither is wrong. One cannot say the other is wrong or right in this particular situation.
So basically you removed something I said from context.
Oh well.
Uh-uh...Right...Whatever you say.
duff_o_josh said:
the words you used were not very rude, they just dont like to read things that make them think twice about what they like. dont worry mamoru-kun.
Ehhh...No. Calling someone or something a 'she-male zombie' or 'almost non-human' or whatever is quite indeed rude. Actually, it's beyond that. It's an unnecessary assault really.