This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Intercept Missiles Without Cabinet Permission

lonesoullost3

Economist in Residence
Joined
1 Jul 2005
Messages
221
Reaction score
12
I didn't know which section to put it in, I guess this is the best considering the broad effects this has.

BBC NEWS | Asia-Pacific | Japan approves new missile rules


This is quite interesting. Slowly, but surely, Japan is allowing itself to take a more active role in it's own defense.
 
Yes it is quite interesting. If it is truelly used with a pacifist policy then I can't see any reason why this should necessarily be a negative thing.
 
Nebiki said:
Yes it is quite interesting. If it is truelly used with a pacifist policy then I can't see any reason why this should necessarily be a negative thing.
Of course it's not negative, except for those who want Japan's population annihilated! Yet Japan's critics will call it "militaristic" that they are allowing their military to shoot down incoming missiles without Cabinet permission. It's so hypocritical it's ludicrous -- the Big Lie technique wherein Japan, the most pacifistic nation in the world, is called belligerent and militaristic by the most belligerently militaristic nations on Earth and their toadies. Just as America, the biggest promoter of freedom in the world, is called imperialistic by the most imperialistically totalitarian countries on Earth and their toadies.
 

You took the words right out of my mouth ^_^.
 
I don`t see anything negative in self-defence, and shhoting down the missiles flying into your country. Hopefully, no one will need this.

As for this
Bramicus said:
Just as America, the biggest promoter of freedom in the world, is called imperialistic by the most imperialistically totalitarian countries on Earth and their toadies.

maybe, maybe, but there also exist different points of view
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…