Mike Cash said:https://jref.com/showthread.php?t=25252
And when locking threads, how about just saying that the thread is locked instead of throwing in further comment directed to one of the people in the thread and then denying them the chance to respond.
RockLee said:Mod's can post in locked threads, that's what Duo & Glenn did.
Mike Cash said:I had already figured that out on my own.
I don't think it should be that way, hence the current thread.
It would have given a much better impression in retrospect had they simply locked the original thread instead of finding all these objections and rule violations after it was already deleted...RockLee said:Mod's can post in locked threads, that's what Duo & Glenn did.
I added "Thread locked", I hope that made your day
Yeah, that's what I meant -- the first shouldn't have been allowed to progress to two pages, even with mod participation, if the topic was so obviously inappropriate for JREF.RockLee said:The original was deleted, the 2nd one was locked. It should've been deleted also
Elizabeth said:Yeah, that's what I meant -- the first shouldn't have been allowed to progress to two pages, even with mod participation, if the topic was so obviously inappropriate for JREF.
That may be inevitable as a last resort but first give the offenders a few words of warning about their attitude, try to get the discussion back on track without resorting to an explict and full-fledged threat....although they don't always work, tactics which I see sometimes applied even on this forumKinsao said:On thread locking in general... I think that threads should have a warning before they are locked, something like 'If you carry on this way, this thread is going to be locked'... that gives people who are actually interested in the topic a chance to get back to the topic and might make them see where their posting has been inappropriate.
Kinsao said:On thread locking in general... I think that threads should have a warning before they are locked, something like 'If you carry on this way, this thread is going to be locked'... that gives people who are actually interested in the topic a chance to get back to the topic and might make them see where their posting has been inappropriate. Also, trolls/stirrers might then back off when they see that mods are taking the thread seriously.
There might be circumstances in which mods feel threads need to be locked straightaway without a warning, in which case there should be an explanation, e.g., 'All these racist insults are unacceptable on the forum, thread locked' (just as example).
Locking threads with no warning or explanation, while it probably seems crystal clear and perfectly logical to the mods, can cause resentment because some people might be unsure of why it was locked (if there is still the possibility to get some constructive on-topic discussion out of it) or they might feel they didn't get the chance to have their say. I realise that the mods can't pander to everyone but should lock inappropriate discussions, but on the other hand the forum membership does need to feel it is respected, otherwise we'll end up not having a membership.
Duo said:... if he were to behave as he did in real life he would have gotten penalized...i don't see that it should be different in a forum. Common sense, respect, and integrity shouldnt wither away simple because you're behind a pc screen...
Elizabeth said:You could also be reprimanded for sarcasm, cursing, offensive jokes etc in settings where it isn't appropriate....this is an international community so naturally all of us live by different standards at different sensitivities to the environment.
In short, I agree with some of the above that the rules need to be much clearer and more objective than "respect and accomodation," certainly not all admins and mods even follow those precepts all of the time.
kohlrak said:In fact, i havn't seen any rules posts either. The only rules page that i know of is the one that you have to agree to when you sign up for an account. For all i know "garbage words" are allowed here.
Warning: Division by zero in /includes/functions.php(4367) : eval()'d code on line 10
kohlrak said:I don't even see it anywhere.... In fact, i get an error trying to view that page...
Even if there are user rules, there should also be mod/admin guidlines as well, that way you don't end up breaking down at the administration level arguing about debatable rules.