This is very interesting. Unfortunately, I can't speak of either of the three countries you talk about, as I have never lived in any of them.
My views might be of no use to you, in that case. ><
I live in England, and my job is mainly about learning - specifically, about encouraging lifelong learning, not just the school learning that finishes at age 16. So motivations for learning, as well as political policy issues connected with education, are something that I've had to think about to some extent.
In England, the kudos attached to grades and qualifications on bits of paper depends to a certain extent on your social class background. If your family are all high academic achievers, and made lots of money out of this, i.e. being a professional person like a lawyer or a doctor, more importance tends to attach to grades. Of course, not all parents are pushy, and not all middle-class kids want to follow in their parents' footsteps, either; but it does tend to be more common. For example when I went to uni, I found that the majority of students there were middle-class (at least, compared with my background!) and considered further/higher education the normal, expected way to go. I'm sure most of them were "rebels" in their way (art college, what do you expect!), so their ingrained conservative attitude to education surprised me!
On the other hand, where people come from what I suppose is called a "working-class" (><) background, they are less commonly driven to get qualifications just for the sake of the bit of paper, and grades are less important. For instance, when I was at secondary school (11-16 years), it was considered really nerdy (not in the good way) to be concerned about getting good grades. To get bad grades was a kind of kudos. I was quite lucky, because I could manage to get decent grades without looking like I was working in class, but if I flunked a test or something, my rep went distinctly up for a while!
Of course, this isn't generic and it happens also that people from a working-class background decide that they want to "better themselves", achieve better grades than their parents, get a better job, etc. It depends on their individual personality, and to some extent on peer pressure.
From that you can deduce that there is much of a stereotype in England that poorer, working-class people are worse-educated and less intelligent than middle- and upper-class people. Does that stereotype exist in all countries? I would imagine that it does, in some amount; but, in countries where education is expensive, perhaps poorer people prize education more? Whereas here, it tends to get scorned.
I guess what I'm trying to say is that "cultural values" can be just as much those of a sub-culture (for example social class) as of a country overall.
People who go back to some kind of learning (whether that's formal or informal) later on, after they've left the system, well, they have different motivations, but the difference is, they are doing it because they choose to, so they tend to be more motivated. It might be watercolour painting for fun when they've retired, Spanish for a holiday, or an accountancy course because they want to change careers... it's their decision.
However, part of my work relates to "coaxing" people back into learning, too. This is a main issue when people don't have good reading or writing skills (this is a problem for about 20% of adults in the UK!
), but of course they might be horrified at the idea of "going back to class", maybe they really hated school, or they feel shy and under-confident. So classes for adults are something quite different from "school". Often, adults will start to learn again because they take up something that interests them, like art or computers, and then they build their reading/writing skills around that - and because they are interested in the subject, the rest follows on. More education often builds up their confidence greatly, too, as they find they get on well with their classmates and are not made to feel "stupid".
Personally, I guess I have a very western viewpoint! I strongly think that applied practical skills are more important than grades on the piece of paper. But of course, to get jobs and stuff you need to be tested in some way to prove that you can do things... ^^
I believe that "learning" doesn't stop when you leave school, and it doesn't have to be something you do in your evening class either. We are always learning, it is more about your state of mind than the number of classes you take. I think the value of education is in teaching kids to reason and use their brains so that they can apply these skills when they grow up.
Qualifications are good
but there needs to be provision for those young people who don't quite fit the mould.
Also, the education system in England was quite focused on the academic side, when I was in it. When I finished at school 10 years ago, "vocational" or practical career options were never really presented to us. Now, I think this has changed quite a bit, but I don't have much experience of the current school ed system. >< I'm a more practical than academic person and I think I would have benefitted from being pointed towards a practical career; however, this was totally not on the cards. <_< Because it was considered much lower down the scale to work for example as an electrician or something, even though you do have to have qualifications in the end to do that job.
I will shut up now.