For three days during his hospitalization, the man was physically restrained and forced to wear diapers. The court declared his hospitalization was illegal based on the man's electronic medical records, which showed the doctor who saw him was not a "designated physician of mental health." Only doctors who are qualified as such are allowed to decide whether a patient needs "hospitalization for medical care and protection." The ruling also determined there was no evidence the man was suffering from mental disorders when he saw the doctors. Lawyers for the hospital operator argued in the trial that doctors determined the man was in a state of "morbid excitement" when he arrived. But the ruling discounted this argument on grounds there was nothing in man's medical records to show he was in such a state. "Even if he was in a state of excitement, it is not hard to believe that the man was surprised at being taken to a psychiatric hospital without any explanation," the ruling stated. In addition to declaring his hospitalization unlawful, the court deemed that restraining him physically was illegal.