Ok. I think both sides have plenty explainations to offer but at the end of the day,to each his own. We are all made to think differently.
Ok... Nall-ohki....Rhetorical question:
Why do people find the human body (especially those instilled with youth and beauty) offensive?
It's seriously beyond me.
I can listen to your arguments and think them through. However, I have my own set of thinkings too. I don't see a need why I have to agree with you.
And, my beliefs are not poor, they just differ from yours. Moreover, I have others who agree with me. So, please do not insult my upbringing.
Ok... Nall-ohki....
Let me pose a question to you. Where do you draw the line? Is it ok to have skirts so short that when a women is standing up straight all you have to do is look at her on the same level and be able to see undrewear? Or is this a question of taste ,with the classic "Eye of the beholder" ?
You say "Why do people find the human body (especially those instilled with youth and beauty) offensive?
On that line of thinking I say let them go to school in bikini's or better yet their underwear...
I don't, but you you have to expect to hear peoples opinions. You are presuming that some of us are useing "offensive" in the means of having girls legs showing, but to find something offensive can also mean in this case the blatent disregard of rules set out, hense my question on where do you draw the line?This is my question. Why do you care so much? Because something is uncomfortable to you, should it be the onus of everyone else to accommodate?
Thats right it is not for you to say, and in regards to school uniforms it is not up to the individual either, remember that. Again going along your line of thinking, why even have rules at all, let the kids do what ever they want, don't worry about disaplining them for anything, or is that going to far? Again ,I say where would YOU draw the line. You have to remember the original poster did not start a thread about young girls wearing short skirts in general, but specificaly stated girls in uniforms. So the original poster has every right to find this offensive, b/c rules are there for a reason and you are confusing what someone can and can't do with what someone should and shouldn't do.Y
I might think they're silly, I might think they're disgusting, but in the end, it's not for me to say whether or not they should do it. The person who draws the line should be that person, and possibly their parents. We don't really have any say in what other people do, especially with something as personal as clothing, and very especially when our only standing in the matter is "I don't like it."
Is the fact that women are sexual beings offensive? If so, god was really having a fun day there.
My meaning is; let the girls choose how short they want their skirt to be. Personally I dont care about what others wear, and how they wear it.
That may be true but since this is school uniforms we're talking about that comment is really irrelevant. School is hardly the place to be getting sexual, no matter who you are. You're there to learn not get a date.
MadamePapillon said:But what ever happened to leaving something to the imagination? Showing some skin is fine but some things should really be saved for the bedroom.
I don't get why some girls want to throw everything out there all at once, I don't mean to sound old fashioned but give the guys something to guess about.
No point in wondering what color underwear she's wearing when you can just walk over and check.Where's the fun in that?
Wow... Thanks for making my point for me. That is right ,you don't have a lot of choice when it comes to school, hense the conforming to the rules of that particular school. Of corse schools are a lot more than learning(By books I think you mean), but they not places to be thought of to pick up guys/girls and with that is mind see who can have to shortest skirt to attract a guys attention. Kids have plenty of time out side of school to wear what they what and no body is complaining there.I highly disagree: schools about a lot more than just learning. Not only that, but it's not like people have a lot of choice in going to school: they have to go to school by law. Children's entire peer group is in school. To say that school isn't the place to get a date is unreasonable and unrealistic.
But... I would also like to leave room for those who do not agree with you. People are people; kids are kids, and they will do what they do.
Than what was the point of all the debating you've been doing in favor of the high school mini skirt?I respect your opinion on the subject, and in fact prefer this sort of wisdom on the subject. I prefer demure women, and in fact would not be unhappy to see skirts be as long as they're intended.
Than what was the point of all the debating you've been doing in favor of the high school mini skirt?
You argue on and on about how it's A-OK for young high school girls to be baring all in the class room and then you come out with that statement. You basically just nullified everything you've previously said, you realize that right?
FrustratedDave said:Don't worry I don't need you to reply to me as I can see where you are trying to take this.
FrustratedDave said:and this line, what cop out if I ever heard one...Me said:But... I would also like to leave room for those who do not agree with you. People are people; kids are kids, and they will do what they do.
Really? I think my message has been pretty close to "let kids be kids". My primary reason for arguing this point is that I feel that modern society and adults in general intrude far too much into the lives of kids. Kids aren't allowed to learn without being lectured to, aren't allowed to think without being told what to think.
Granted, it is the role of the community to bring up children correctly and keep them in check, but too much interference quickly becomes oppression, and children will rebel even further (it's in human nature).
Kids should be let to be kids, and that includes flirting with sexuality. Let the kids alone.
Wow, I wasn't even going to respond but after reading that statement I have to wonder, do you have any close personal contact with kids at all? The sheer ignorance of that statement actually floored me for a second.
MadamePapillon said:What exactly do you mean by 'flirt with sexuality'? Left to their own devices I'd say about 80% of those kids will make the wrong desicions regarding sex and relationships. Trust me, I've see this in action time and time again and it almost never ends good.
MadamePapillon said:Take a good long look at american high schools and you'll see exactly where your attitude leads. Kids are, for the most part, idiots. You leave them on their own with raging hormones and skimpy school girl skirts and you don't have to be a genius to figure out that's asking for trouble.
MadamePapillon said:Oh, and just as a side note. I think the skimpy over sexed school girl is also a perv magnet. I think most parents would rather their daughters NOT be followed home by a 40 yr old man in an unmarked white van....but maybe that's just me.
At my high school in Sapporo, there was a dress code. Most schools probably have one.If there is a dress code or uniform, then it is a rule.
If the rule is broken, there is a conflict with authority.
That is bad for developing minds.
Oh right, because you hear about all about the decisions regarding sex that turns out okay, right? I'm sure you have some definitive statistics.
What? You don't? Okay, I guess I'll just rely on your anecdotal evidence based on nothing but your opinion. That sounds like a good idea.
Of course it is. Teenagers ALWAYS ask for trouble. Guess what? They get through it. Kids have raging hormones: check. Kids do make poor decisions: check. Try as you might, you cannot teach someone not to make mistakes: check.
Skirts aren't the cause of kids' sexual attraction to each other. They are an expression, and a reasonably safe one at that. Treating the symptoms does nothing more than make adults feel comfortable; it does nothing for the kids.
Yeah, right. Those school girls are askin' for it. Cue the 40 year old man in an unmarked white van... 'cause you know, that ALWAYS HAPPENS.
Man, I was going down the street today, and I saw like 20 white vans parked outside this high school girls' house. You can't send a female 14-18 outside anymore showing any kind of skin without a million sex offenders following them home!
Think this is absurd? It is. So is your suggestion that 40 year old men stalking schoolgirls being COMMON in any way.
Oh please, I went to an american high school for three years, one year five girls dropped out of school due to becoming pregnant and a number of guys dropped out to support their own unexpected bundles of joy. And this was in a town of only 5,000. You don't need statistics to see what's going on. Five may not seem like a lot but factor in all the girls who got abortions, of which I knew many, and you have a serious problem.
MadamePapillon said:But you can help push them in the right direction. It may be a form of self expression but even you can't deny that short skirts are more likely to get the blood pumping than knee length skirts. No matter what any girl says, she knows that when she puts on a short skirt guys are going to look her way, anyone who says otherwise is lying, and badly at that.
MadamePapillon said:At what point did I say they're asking for it?
And I don't know where you've been but you can hardly turn on the news or pick up a newspaper without a report of men following girls from school, or trying to pick them up or a young girl being sexually assaulted by an older man.
Either you're very uninformed or living in a fantasy world if you think that girls getting harrassed by older men is in any way UNCOMMON. It happens all the time and very often school girls are targeted. Regulating short skirts into the dress code isn't going to help any.
(body/car analogy)<snip>...You're not going to sheild adolescents from sex. Period. They are sexulally mature beings, and they are going to act like them. Preventing them from hiking their skirts is petty and completely without merit in any way. The only effect it has is on apperances, which only appeases adults who believe it is their business to protect children from themselves...<snip>
Three in ten teenage girls (31%) become pregnant at least once before they reach the age of 20 – more than 750,000 teen pregnancies a year. Eight in ten of these pregnancies are unintended and 81% are to unmarried teens.
National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy
Despite impressive declines over the past decade, the United States still has the highest rates of teen pregnancy and births in the Western industrialized world. Teen pregnancy costs the United States at least $7 billion annually.
National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy
A majority of both girls and boys who are sexually active wish they had waited. Of those who have had sex, more than one half of teen boys (55%) and the majority of teen girls (70%) said they wish they had waited longer to have sex.
National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy
Nineteen (19) million new STD infections occur each year, almost half of them among young people ages 15 to 24.
Centers for Disease Control
Forty percent (40%) of older adolescents surveyed by the Kaiser Family Foundation incorrectly believe that the contraceptive ツ"pillツ" and ツ"shotツ" protect against STDs and HIV.
2005 ASHA State of the Nation
Half of all new HIV infections occur among adolescents.
2005 ASHA State of the Nation
In 2004, an estimated 7,761 young people were living with AIDS, a 42% increase since 2000, when 5,457 young people were living with AIDS.
Centers for Disease Control
I guess you're right, who cares? These really ARE sexually mature beings and they sure are acting like it. Let's just let them do whatever they want because teenagers ALWAYS know best.