Are the words wrong, or the way I've structured the sentence?It's completely wrong I'm afraid. Since it's a quite easy question to formulate, you should get there with a bit more study.
You might call this "nitpicking", but what you are referring to is interrogatives/interrogative words(疑問詞), not pronouns. I believe the OP is talking about あなた, i.e., personal pronoun(人称代名詞) by I made 滞在 the subject (I think) and dropped the pronoun.Just a tip: Pronouns (you reading this, Tori-senpai? ;D) that indicate a question, such as どこ, 誰, 何 etc. cannot be a sentence's topic and therefore cannot be succeeded by は.
It's not incorrect, but sounds awkward or odd. Not just because it's rude or not, but because it's obvious from the context, second-person pronouns are usually not mentioned in the questions like yours.So although it's rude to say it, あなたは is not grammatically incorrect?
You misunderstood interrogative pronouns, or more likely, you don't seem to understand what the pronoun is yet. "Where" is an interrogative word(疑問詞) and an interrogative pro-adverb(疑問副詞), but is not an interrogative pronoun(疑問代名詞) in English grammar, as you can see even in the wiki page I linked in my previous post. Interrogative pronouns are just five (who, whose, whom, which and what) in English.Actually, the only reason why I called them pronouns is because my dictionary says that they are in fact pronouns. I still don't see the logic behind it (even after looking up on Wikipedia what a pronoun actually is), but whatever.
Yes, that's what I was referring to. I just forgot what they were called in English. Actually, now that you say it, I think I can recall something called "interrogative pronouns" from my elementary school time.
The focus is put on the word/phrase/clause preceding が and following は in a noun sentence(名詞文). Interrogative words such like いつ, どこ, だれ or なに are always what the questioner is asking about, i.e., the focus of the question in a interrogative sentence, so が, not は, is always associated with them. In other words, these interrogative words can be the topic if the focus of the sentence is not on the interrogative word.Just a tip: Pronouns (you reading this, Tori-senpai? ;D) that indicate a question, such as どこ, 誰, 何 etc. cannot be a sentence's topic and therefore cannot be succeeded by は.
That's exactly what I wanted to say. Please read again my post more carefully. (Do you think interrogative words are used only in questions?)Yes, but you would normally set them in quotation marks to indicate that they don't actually symbolize a question in this case.
「誰」や「何」は疑問代名詞ですが、「なぜ」や「どう」は疑問副詞です。
Does that mean "I may be wrong but do not point it out"? You started talking to me with a bold word we had been discussed about, but the wording was wrong in the first place. You mean I should have overlooked it or ignored you?Anyway, you might have noticed I lack the understanding of some linguistical terms. No need to get mad over this.
Just a tip: Pronouns (you reading this, Tori-senpai? ;D)
Now that is nitpicky. Quotations are obviously special in the way that you can put any word in them and that word wouldn't be directly affecting the parts of the sentence outside the quotation. I ask, where else can you use interogatory words, except direct (and indirect) questions and quotations?Do you think interrogative words are used only in questions?
No. But don't forget that I'm just a human being and fallible. I might say things that are wrong or only partly right, or out of place, but through discussion I'm able to broaden my horizons and make less (of the same) mistakes in the future.You mean I should have overlooked it or ignored you?
It's not the first time I hear something like this.Have you learned 生意気 yet?
誰が見ても間違っている。I ask, where else can you use interogatory words, except direct (and indirect) questions and quotations?
I believe how it's received by the readers would be far more important, just like your using "nitpicking" regardless of my intention.I do not mean to offend anyone.
This could almost count as an indirect question... But I guess my definition of an indirect question would be quite off the standard then. So yeah, this was indeed somewhat broadening.誰が見ても間違っている。
何もわかっていないのに、なぜか噛みついてくる。
It is I who should say so.I'm sorry if I should have offended you in any way.