"The government needs to take responsibility for providing programs through which they can continuously study the Japanese language and the norms and conventions of Japanese society," the paper said. It added that making participation in such programs a requirement should be considered for those residing in Japan on a mid- to long-term basis.
On the national security front, the panel said that, to date, no cases have been confirmed where land use by foreign nationals has impeded the functions of Self‑Defense Forces facilities or similar sites.
How about some penalties for employers who may be complicit? It's just what I know/am aware of, and it could be more widespread, but certain eikaiwa owners literally tell the green/newbie teachers that they've sponsored, "oh, you don't have to pay nenkin/healthcare/etc."What would be far more useful than lessons on social norms (I feel insulted that someone thinks I need them) are clear instructions to new residents on what they need to enrol in and where to go to do this, with people who don't enrol politely followed up by local municipalities and immigration if necessary.
Remembering Dentsu being fined just 500,000 yen for overworking a young woman to her suicide 10 years ago, I'm not holding my breath!How about some penalties for employers who may be complicit? It's just what I know/am aware of, and it could be more widespread, but certain eikaiwa owners literally tell the green/newbie teachers that they've sponsored, "oh, you don't have to pay nenkin/healthcare/etc."
Maybe educating/schooling those folks would help. Place some responsibility (and possible fines) on the enablers.
What I'm saying is that this seems like an attempt to compensate for some, in my humble opinion, honestly BS reforms. I recently heard student years will likely not count anymore. That really derails my entire plan, since I planned on getting into a four year college if I could after I got a bachelors in political science or SOMETHING (assuming my Japanese is good enough to take it, hehe) They manage the QUALITY of the emigrants by TEACHING us how to behave. I guess I could just spend ten years in japan then go to school. But I don't wanna go to school at 28. I guess, I'll just take a page out of @Grandpa Frank 's book and become "'Charisma Man'", and pull the huzz and get married, assuming the three year marriage rule stays intact.Actually, I'm not sure what point you're making. The 'make up for' suggests one thing compensating for another, but making immigration more difficult is an independent policy to giving foreigners culture lessons - the government could easily implement neither policy, one of them or both. Their aims are different too: one is to manage quantity and quality of immigrants and one is to 'teach us how to behave'.
I'll give you a verbal beating once I understand your argument better (joke!).
Anyway, welcome back. I hope life is treating you well.
Oh I know. I'm just upset that when it comes to it, its gonna be a lot harder than it already was.There's no need or even urgency to get naturalized. You're going to need to support yourself anyway so just get a job and legally reside in Japan that way.
Then you can think about permanent residency or naturalization later.
Maybe I missed it. How is it going to get harder? Even if they actually implement these assimilation classes -- which I think is unlikely -- it shouldn't have much impact.Oh I know. I'm just upset that when it comes to it, its gonna be a lot harder than it already was.
The assimilation classes are helpful, whatever I said above. Raising the amount of years from five to ten to natrualize would make it harder. I don't care about the classes in one way or another, which is probably why I came off with a negative viewpoint.Maybe I missed it. How is it going to get harder? Even if they actually implement these assimilation classes -- which I think is unlikely -- it shouldn't have much impact.
Ah ok. You're referring to some other thread then. Got it.The assimilation classes are helpful, whatever I said above. Raising the amount of years from five to ten to natrualize would make it harder. I don't care about the classes in one way or another, which is probably why I came off with a negative viewpoint.
Would you want to naturalise? If you do, you have to renounce your American citizenship. What if you need to return to the US for an extended period because of family reasons? A similar reason has stopped me from even thinking about naturalisation. You're way too young to be considering making such an irreversible step.The assimilation classes are helpful, whatever I said above. Raising the amount of years from five to ten to natrualize would make it harder. I don't care about the classes in one way or another, which is probably why I came off with a negative viewpoint.
I almost responded the same but then I discovered that maybe even Arudou Debito didn't relinquish his American citizenship.Would you want to naturalise? If you do, you have to renounce your American citizenship.