This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Crime Eighteen-year sentence upheld for 2017 highway road rage case

thomas

Unswerving cyclist
Admin
Joined
14 Mar 2002
Messages
21,056
Reaction score
18,912
A Japanese high court upheld Monday a sentence of 18 years in prison for a man convicted of a 2017 road rage incident that killed a couple and injured their two children and caused an outcry that led to stricter punishment for dangerous driving. The Tokyo High Court rejected the appeal of Kazuho Ishibashi, 32, who was convicted of dangerous driving at a lower court for forcing the car of Yoshihisa Hagiyama, 45. His family stopped on the passing lane of the Tomei Expressway in Kanagawa Prefecture on 5 June 2017, where a truck rear-ended it. Extensive news coverage of the incident sparked more significant public concern over dangerous driving. In 2020, the government enforced revisions to Japan's traffic laws that toughened punishment for road rage offences.



Ishibashi Katsuho




The Supreme Court stated that the District Court had unlawfully reversed its pre-trial stance that Ishibashi's behaviour did not amount to reckless driving when it delivered its verdict. In a retrial at the lower court in June 2022, Ishibashi was again given an 18-year sentence, which he appealed again. The updated road traffic law, which took effect in June 2022, characterizes road rage as "disruptive driving," including aggressive tailgating and horn usage. Violators could face up to five years or a maximum fine of 1 million JPY (USD 6,600). Other dangerous behaviours classified as road rage include driving on the wrong side of the road, braking, and aggressively switching lanes.




Read more on the case:





 
senseless, what a complete waste

Sorry for these unusually harsh words, but this creature represents the scum of humanity. During the first trial, when confronted with his actions that resulted in the death of two people, he replied to the court that he, too, had lost a lot: his fiancee had broken up their engagement in the course of the trial. When his second appeal was rejected this week, he allegedly threatened the judge, telling him: "Wait till I get out."

Is there an inherent evil?
 
Sounds like a traumatic yet happier ending for the fiance. Her life would have been miserable with that creep. Probably he's an abuser as well.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…