Sorry to disappoint you, I'm not selling property, not an agent either. So lets examine your arguments:Trying to unload some unsellable properties, huh?
Property is illiquid in the sense that it takes a long time to settle, but so what. That should only bother someone who is not a conceptual thinker. I sense your vulnerability. If the property market is a good market, its a good market. Liquidity is hardly an issue. Buying foreclosed property, you lock your price in on the day. The poor sentiment means you get a better price.1. Real estate investment is highly illiquid--you have to wait for a buyer to come along and this may take a longer time than the investor can wait.
Well often investors pay property managers to look after the property, some people get neighbours to collect rent, some do it themselves depending on their personal context. Some actually owner-occupy the premises. Rather than pay high rents, they realise its better to earn high yields.2. It requiers a hand-on approach--either the investor or some he/she can really trust is required to take active management of the property.
Actually property is subjected to capital gains tax unless you do it as a business, but that's true for most markets except NZ, as indicated. Income tax only if you are in the business like a broker. All forms of income are subject to tax. That's the system you voted for.3. The property and any income it generates is subject to local/national taxes.
Yes and no. You need to think. I guess you are breaking out into a cold sweat about now. Even the Japanese bonds paying 1% require you to think.4. Due Diligence--you need to really understand the market for your investment as well as all aspects of the property.
Well I guess you are talking about Philippines or NZ property. Well, thats where a litlte knowledge and research goes a long way.5. Currency exposure --any investments that require foreign exchange carries a risk that the foreign currency will depreciate minimizing and gains or magnifiying any losses.
Wow, I could swear you sound like an investment advisor...talking that nonsense. Investment advisors are sales people like any other. They get paid commissions. The only good advisors are independent analysts, and only then when they are critical thinkers. What a joke! The last time I heard one, they were talking up the 'buy and hold' strategy before the crash.If any of you want to diversify your investments with foreign assets, talk to a trusted financial advisor.
Same sentiments here, but I will differentiate myself a little too.Best investment opportunities in this crazy world of ours today would be (and I agree with most of Shouganai's statements):
I agree, so long as China is the lowest cost producer and has the capacity to generate its own internal demand it will do relatively better, which is what currencies are about.Chinese Renembi (as they will be the only country producing anything for export and their economy, while not rising to the levels of years past, will continue growing nonetheless as they are the major exporter to the world with many companies now having their factories there.)
I agree with you if you are talking about city property, but fringe and rural properties will not fall further, and you will get better prices now since the outlook is negative. Certainly I can't see it getting worse in foreclosed market in these areas.Real Estate: Hmm, I'm not sure as even Japan's real estate prices have not even come close to the levels of the late 80's/early90's and those that bought back then are still in the hole. However, buying in todays market may provide some profit, but I'd wait a bit.
I disagree with you here because markets get overbought & oversold. When banks in Australia fall 70% to a major support 2 weeks ago I recommended them. Sure, long term broad equities will perform badly, but you can trade medium term to goo effect. So when people look at the 1970s and say no money was made in the period, they are not breaking it down into yearly periods. Small investors can do better than funds in these periods. You just need to become a chart trader. The 'buy & hold' strategy stays in Arctic territory where it belongs.Stocks: No way, no how as they will only reach new lows with little bumps up here and there to suck in the gullible thinking that the markets are on a rebound. Once a World Bank is formed and every country is finally on the same page, maybe, maybe, I would think again about investing in stocks, but that is still some years away. America will and must, go bankrupt first. And it will. However there are still some stocks that may turn a profit as they always have like in energy, oil, and defence.
I'm afraid you like a great many people don't understand the role of gold. Its not just an item of jewellery and industrial demand, its also a form of money. In that role its tangible. The money in your pocket is a claim against taxpayers to pay tax. That's an intangible form of wealth since its based on slavery. Its based on flawed ethical values. There is also the capacity for the US to flood the world with USD to repay all its debts since they are all denominated in USD. The implication is that the US is better off than China or Japan who hold US paper. The US debtors (households mostly) are holding real assets (property). Ask yourself - if you are right - why are gold prices holding, even rising, and inflation has yet to really move. I agree with you, producing farms are not a bad thing, though if poverty, people might be pinching your fruit & vege.Gold is only valuable if people want it and accept it in trade for other things they want and need.
The US is a food basket, it does not depend on the rest of the world, so I agree with your point BUT....If the US dollar crashes, The US will not be able to afford to produce and export food and raw materials to countries that depend on them. Millions will starve. The price of food and other needed materials the US exports will skyrocket world wide.
Its not a case of the US going broke, but some poor and unprepared people going broke.The US and nations like saudi arabia can never go broke as long as they have a limitless supply of materials other nations depend on for their survival and way of life, and they have their oil fields, mines, and farms secure and heavily defended.
I think the time will come in the next 8 months when it will be a good time to buy US property again...its still a little soon.My stockbroker at Euro Pacific told me to invest heavily into foreclosed US property and farm stock. He is betting on the dollar collapsing soon.
We will not return to a barter economy, we will stay with the USD until another currency is invented. Brentton Woods over again. Will there be any principles behind this currency? I don't it, just a recapitalisation of the world to make it look like these people know what they are doing, so they can stay in power.But if the US becomes like old Japan and uses rice and food and raw materials as currency. US farmland and raw material stock will go to the roof! If food becomes money, how much will fertile US farmland be worth? I haven't committed yet, but I understand his reasoning.
Real estate is tricky? And that would be based on your limited knowledge? Should we all place ourselves in your camp, or should we perhaps think in our own personal context, because you have clearly resigned yourself to the fact that the best you can do is 1%. All the best with that strategy. And you think we are in a deflationary period right?Real estate is one of the riskiest investments you can make unless you are actually going to use the poperty. And average historic returns on real estate in the U.S. over the last century was only about 3%. (The U.S. was the fastest growing economy at that time.)
If someone comes up to you and tells you that you can make a killing in undervalued property in the coutryside, turn and run the other way because you're dealing with a SCAM ARTIST.
You're speaking like a true economics 101 graduate. Yes indeed, liquidity is not really an issue, but you raised it, so I'm surprised you would critique it.The OP is trying to cause some confusion so you should WATCH OUT. For example, regarding illiquidity, the time to settle is besides the point, you may not be able to sell a property when you want to or need to. Information about real estate is highly assymetric, which means there are a few that know or think they know what's happening and those that don't (who become victims of the former group).
I didn't say gold has no intrinsic value. Gold is probably the most useful metal known to man. But then so is silver, which trades for 50x less. You didn't answer my question. If gold is useless, why does it trade for $950/oz, whilst your advice is given away free on the internet? You're the economist - answer that one please! The last 100 years has been very dull for economists. The reason is they are detached from the reality. Please tie that fact into your modelling, and explain to me. My explanation is that gold is a real commodity with value as jewellery, money, as well as industrial applications...but mostly as money...real money. It's not a liability like cash. Cash is a no longer a liability for the government to pay you in gold, which meant something when the govt had gold, and it would mean still more if we knew how much gold the Federal Reserve has. But the reality is that the Federal Reserve is not required to disclose its gold holdings. Its a private enterprise.Another example is the OP's argument about gold. If gold doesn't have much intrinsic value, i.e. practical use, then it's practically the same as paper money--and paper money is more convenient.
Without taking much more time, I just want to tell readers to BEWARE. There's an old saying that goes: Beware of free advice, it is seldom cheap. SCAMS are born every minute on the Internet, don't get suckered.
You really are detached from the real world. Firstly no one gives you advice with any guarantees, and you wouldn't trust them if they did. They all place disclaimers at the bottom of their research. Regardless of whether its misleading. Of course part of the reason is they concede they make mistakes, as I occasionally do, and its also because they cannot so easily offer advice in the context of your personal matters. Of course it helps if they know your personal context. More important though is independent advice (which I offer) and that people exercise their critical judgement/analysis (as I do as a critical analyst). This is what gives me the capacity to reduce your arguments to tears.If you need investment advice, find someone you can trust and talk to---and sue, if needed, if he/she gives you misleading information. Get rich quick schemes are a sure way to lose your money.
Let's see, when I posted my last comments here gold was trading at about $1,000 per oz. and now it's trading at about $1,050 per oz. A 5% return is not too shabby in these times, but when translated into yen, which appreciated about 11% during that time, there's a loss. (And you still need to be careful about the bubble bursting- when China stops buying it, price will fall.)
What you might want to do now is look at S. Korean won backed assets. The won is very undervalued and under pressure to appreciate.