This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Accounts of Enola Gay Crew

should they have bombed Hiroshima?

A bit of a serious discussion here, should america have used the nuclear bomb on Hiroshima?
 

And yet, if you removed every single person from LA and detonated the bomb, that percentage would still stand. I was only refering to blast radius and maybe psi as a function of that radius, sorry for the confusion.
 
To be human is to realise he has a choice -- at all times.
To blame others, the opponent, the soviets, the Nazis, Pearl Harbor, the public outrage, need to save lives, is to close eyes to this human condition and to seek refuge in an easy defense -- like an animal that has no choice.
There was a choice, many choices, and many, many more.
Those are for murder-in-self-defense case arguments -- not for the leading country of the free world.

So let us not put the words in the mouths of respondents by asking should -- this is no catholic mass.
My answer is: no. Using the atomic bombs was not necessary because there were at least several choices laid before the US, but the choices were neglected out of choice, blinded by fear, greed, haste, and expediency.
 
I'm not a historian, but my thoughts are thus:

to the American leadership, in order to end the war a devastating attack was necessary; something to crush the Japanese morale and make victory seem impossible... dropping the second bomb on Nagasaki was to reinforce that sense of hopelessness, and to give the impression that we had more than just one of these bombs, and that we were willing to continue dropping them until there was no one left to fight...

nevertheless, I never liked the idea of targetting civilians. The major arguments for the decision I can remember are that the Japanese would have continued fighting to the last man and dragged the war on for as long as possible; there couldn't have been the same psychological impact if a different target was picked, and that the Japanese had no qualms about targetting civilians, both in Asia and America. I recognize these arguments and the fact that the war did end very quickly after the bombs dropped, but I don't find any of it real justification or vindication for all thse civilian casualties that week (and all the repercussions thereafter). I've read several accounts of what happened in Hiroshima, the first of which was Sadako's thousand paper cranes, one of the first books I read... I find the first-person accounts of how devastating the bombs were to be the most compelling arguments against ever dropping them again.

to sum up my own feelings, America needed to show it had the power to end the war as quickly as possible, and that's what they did, but I would prefer to think that all those civilian casualties were not necessary as collateral damage.
 
With the greatest of respect to the original poster, there's a considerably longer and more detailed current thread on this topic entitled "Accounts of Enola Gay Crew" which is (at the moment) sitting near the top of the first page of the forum. Maybe a moderator could join the two or something?

Edit: This post got merged from another thread (in case you're wondering what I'm talking about)
 
Last edited:
"She said that if Truman had waited even one week longer, there may never have been a need to drop the bombs."

This is demonstrably untrue. 3 days before that week was up, the Japanese had successfully tested their own atomic bomb. It was planned to be used on the nearly 1 million person strong invasion of Kyushu.

In hindsight, the bombings turned out to stop the war immediately, but I don't know that I can justify them with the knowledge that they had at the time.
 
Do you have proof of this ? Even 2ndary that might point to the primary proof ? Anything ?
 
Wilcox, Rober K. Japan's Secret War. New York: Marlowe & Co., 1995

Pictorial History of the Second World War, vol. 5. New York: Wm. H. Wise & Co., 1970

Parrott, Lindsay. "Five Cyclotrons Wrecked in Japan." New York Times, Novermber 24, 1945. (additional stories on Nov 26, 29 and Dec 5, 6, 14, and 15.)

The book I'm reading has a photo of one of the cyclotrons being disposed of by the US military. Jack Seward's Strange But True Stories from Japan.

I misquoted also, the invasion force was numbered at 3.5 million.
 
vorpar said:
This is demonstrably untrue. 3 days before that week was up, the Japanese had successfully tested their own atomic bomb. It was planned to be used on the nearly 1 million person strong invasion of Kyushu.

And where exactly was this bomb tested? You need an extremely large amount of space to test a bomb. Testing one in Japan would be nearly impossible due to the densely populated environment. The Japanese were being pinned back on every front, so it's unlikely they could have taken it overseas for testing. I'm curious as to where exactly this device went off and why there is no mention of it in any official records.

The original argument for creating the bomb was because Germany was considered to be close to developing one, so the Allies knew they had to develop the technology first. If there was any real knowledge that the Japanese had a bomb, this would have been a propaganda gift for Truman in his argument for ending the war quickly. Yet, no one at the time, or since in an official capacity has ever used this argument that I'm aware of.
 
RE: Japan's Nuclear Arms as of August 1945 & Plan to Bomb Kyushu

Vorpar:

Thank you for the references. I shall be back to post an argument against what you presented;
vorpar said:
3 days before that week was up, the Japanese had successfully tested their own atomic bomb.

It was planned to be used on the nearly 1 million [sic. > 3.5 million] person strong invasion of Kyushu.
 
If there was any real knowledge that the Japanese had a bomb, this would have been a propaganda gift for Truman in his argument for ending the war quickly.

I didn't quite say it clearly enough, but they didn't know until after it was tested that Japan had the bomb. It wasn't tested until after the Nagasaki bombing.

It was tested at a research facility in Korea. You're right, they sent the scientists away since nothing could get done during the American bombing.

Debate all that you wish. I myself haven't checked the primary sources, so I don't know the complete accuracy of what I have presented here. I don't mean to offend, I just thought this was an interesting little known tidbit.

I personally think that the use of nuclear weapons was a tragedy, especially against a mostly civilian population. Nobody can accurately predict what Japan would have done with their bomb either, so I'm not saying that it justifies the American bombings.

In any case, it isn't really that far-fetched an idea, considering that Japan was researching fission in the '20s, at the same time numerous other countries were.
 
A Different Account by Enola Gay Commander, Robert Lewis

While Theodore Van Kirk, Navigator, Morris Jepson, Weapons Test Officer, and Dr Harold Agnew reaffirms the bombimg of Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, the Commandar of Enola Gay, Robert Lewis, chooses to differ from their view, as do J Robert Oppenheimer and Dwight Eisenhower.

The Independent Online Edition
Independent Media TV

(c) 2005 Independent News & Media (UK) Ltd.
 
Last edited:
vorpar said:
It was tested at a research facility in Korea. You're right, they sent the scientists away since nothing could get done during the American bombing.

I'm not saying you're completely wrong, but the balance of probability would lead me to believe that this isn't a true account. Recently a "historian" in the UK published a book claiming that Germany had also developed a bomb, but his arguments were widely discredited. He put up what seemed like a reasonably sound argument to someone reading his book. But when you looked at the bigger picture, he had been incredibly selective with the truth in order to build a case.

Korea, China et. al. need no excuses to criticize Japan's wartime atrocities. If there had been any testing of nuclear weapons on Korean soil, I'm pretty sure it would be at the forefront of any debate and other countries would never let Japan forget about it, yet I've never heard a word come out of Korea about this.
 
The Japanese Nuclear Project: How Was It ? How Is It ?

Was there a Japanese A-Bomb, genzai bakudan ナ陳エナスq窶敘。ナ甜, in 1945 ?


The Snell Report on an Interrogation of a Japanese Intelligence Officer
Japan Developed Atom Bomb; Russia Grabbed Scientists by David Snell
Atlanta Constitution Oct. 3 1946.
(C) The Atlanta Constitution and David Snell 1946


The controversy regarding the Japanese Nuclear Program began with a US Army officer David Snell (an agent of the Twenty-Fourth Criminal Investigation Detachment) who interviewed a certain Japanese Captain Tsetusuo Wakabayashi ( "pseudonym" ) who had been "in charge of counter-espionage at the atomic developing project in Korea.ツ" ツ"Wakabayashiツ" told Snell in Seoul 1945 that;

The Japanese Bomb And Why It Matters (pdf)
William J. Pellas (http://www.williamjpellas.com/)
in Cold War Times May/June 2004 pp. 19-20
(C) US Library of Congress 2003


Obviously there would be thousands of pages to be written on the Japanese nuclear program, and at least dozens of questions raised. These are some that I believe are essential :

1) How much of Wakabayashi's account of Japan's nuclear program and bomb testing relayed in Snell's report can be supported by evidence ?

If the answer is preeminently positive, follows the question;

2) How much was the US aware of the Japanese nuclear program ? Is there evidence ?

If the answer is preeminently positive, follows the question;

3) Did that knowledge influence the US bombing of Hiroshima ? Is there evidence ?

If the answer is preeminently positive, follows the question;

4) How much can Japan be blamed for its hypocricy of crying murder when they themselves were contemplating nuclear bombing US mainland indiscriminately with 9,000 nuclear weapons dropped from balloons as it had done with conventional bombs ? Is there evidence ?

If the answer is preeminently positive, follows the question;

5) How much has Japan been preparing for a nuclear re-armament after 1952 ? Is there evidence ?

If the answer is preeminently positive, follows the questions;

6) Where does Japan's nuclear offensive preparedness stand right now ?
What evidence do we have of Japan walking the double ropes of "victim" and "villain" ?
What has been its main means of information manipulation ?

7) What interest lies in a "possible" nuclear re-armament of Japan for the US ?
It is obvious that a nuclear re-armament amounts to independence from the US nuclear shield, politically and militarily.
What's in it for the US to let Japan slip out of its rein ?
Or is it just another "conspiration cooked up by idle day-dreamers and Japan bashers" ?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Useful links On the (Japanese) Nuclear Program(s):

Japanese atomic program
Nuclear Weapons Program FAS: The Federation of American Scientists
Japan and Atomic Bombs Links to Japan Incorporated articles
CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE OF NUCLEAR WEAPON Masaaki Koarashi
Japanese development of nuclear energy several possible Japanese nuclear testings before August 15, 1945
Japan's Atomic Bomb: We almost lost all a personal account by Leon Thompson
Japan's A-Bomb 39th Bomb Group (VH), 20th Air Force, claims Japan detonated an atomic bomb
Japan's Atomic Bomb Michael Trossman favors Imperial Japan's motivation, suggests nuclear rearmament of modern Japan
Wiki Talk: Japanese atomic program discussion on IJ nuclear program

German nuclear energy project
Soviet atomic bomb project
Manhattan Project
Links: japan nuclear weapons program Links to FAS articles, nuclear programs of the world
List of countries with nuclear weapons

History of nuclear weapons
Nuclear weapon
Nuclear weapon design
Critical mass

Uranium Maps Worldwide distribution of Uranium Ores (requires Java)
Uraninite
Yellowcake
Uranium hexafluoride
Uranium
Uranium-235
Uranium-238
Plutonium

Uranium Production FAS page
Heavy water
Enriched uranium
Uranium Enrichment
Uranium Enrichment (pdf)
Isotope separation for uranium enrichment

Gaseous diffusion
Gas centrifuge
Zippe-type centrifuge

Cyclotron a kind of particle accelerator
Particle accelerator
Particle Accelerators Around the World

Nuclear testing
Nuclear explosion (detonation, blast)
Nuclear Weapon Effects Calculator
Electromagnetic pulse
Gamma radiation
Firestorm
Shock wave
Mushroom cloud
Radioactive contamination
Nuclear fallout

Trinity test
Castle Bravo
Tsar Bomba
Table of Known Nuclear Tests Worldwide: 1945-69 | 1970-96 National Resources Defense Council
Category: Nuclear test sites
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vorpar:

What are required for Wakabayashi-Snell-Wilcox's claim to Japan's Nuclear Bomb Testing of August 12, 1945 ?

These are the bare minimum number of conditions that would have to be met
1) for a Japanese atomic bomb to have existed at that time
2) for the nuclear bomb to have detonated off shore of Hungnam 窶ケツサ窶愿ャ (Jap. Konan) Korea, August 12, 1945.

First there would have had to be uranium ore(s) to supply the raw, naturally occurring uranium within Japanese access.

Second there would have had to be a facility with a certain throughput, processing the raw uranium to a higher concentration of uranium.

Third there would have had to be an established enrichment technology.

Fourth there would have had to be a facility employing the enrichment technolgy to separate U-235 from U-238 via enrichment.

Fifth the enrichment process would have had to last long enough to have accumulated U-235 above critical mass.

Six there would have had to be an explosion mechanism deveoped. The enriched U-235 of a quantity above critical mass would have had to be assembled in sub-critical mass parts that would reach above critical mass at time of desired detonation.

Seventh if the bomb was tested, there would have had to be telltale signs of the testing if the test was performed above ground or waters.

Does the August 12, 1945 Japanese a-bomb have enough evidence (records, witness accounts, orders, plans, reports, books) to satisfy these criteria ?

What does Robert K. Wilcox have to offer in terms of concrete evidence supporting the existence of a working atomic bomb in Imperial Japan before the surrender ?
 
Last edited:
Re: Vorpar's comments (just to keep it simple)

Vorpar:

I believe you mean August 12, 1945. From what I read, the atomic bomb testing might not have been successful. What makes you (or your sources) conclude that the a-bomb testing was a success ? Besides, even if the testing was a success, those happened AFTER the dropping of fat-man and little-boy. So in principle, the testing which occurred later could not have influenced the US decision to "nuke 'em" both of which which occurred earlier than the alleged Japanese testing. Could you be more specific on that piece of info ?
When was the decision made ?
Who (or what document) relates that decision ?
Who knew in Imperial Japan of that decision ?
Who in the US knew this beforehand ?
Unless the US knew this IJ decision, it would also become impossible to say that the "Kyushu Plan" had anything to do with the US decision to nuke Hiroshima & Nagasaki.
Wilcox, Rober K. Japan's Secret War. New York: Marlowe & Co., 1995
He is definitely the spearhead of the theory now. Are you aware of any new evidence he was able to muster in his new 1995 edition after the 1985 edition ?
Pictorial History of the Second World War, vol. 5. New York: Wm. H. Wise & Co., 1970

Parrott, Lindsay. "Five Cyclotrons Wrecked in Japan." New York Times, Novermber 24, 1945.
(additional stories on Nov 26, 29 and Dec 5, 6, 14, and 15.)
The book I'm reading has a photo of one of the cyclotrons being disposed of by the US military. Jack Seward's Strange But True Stories from Japan.
The existence of cyclotrons doesn't mean a thing in itself; in fact there are 22 countries listed here for illustration that have the more advanced version of the cyclotron, and hence those that could be considered comparable to Japan having 5 cyclotrons back in 1945. Now they don't all have nuclear bombs, do they ?
Also must be noted, countries with nuclear weapons such as Pakistan, North Korea, and Israel are not even listed. Therefore using the cyclotron as evidence to support the existence of atomic bombs in 1945 Japan before the surrender is unfounded.

60-inch cyclotron, completed 1938 Riken Institute (窶板敘陳、) 窶板昶?ーツサナ?wナ陳、窶ケ窶?ツ焦?
The first to be built in Japan, this was a copy of Lawrence Livermore National Lab's; developping the cyclotron at Cal Berkeley in the 1930's, the American inventor Dr Ernst Lawrence had personally delivered the plans for this device to Dr Nishina Yoshio himself. Of course this was before the Pacific War broke out in Dec. 1941.

 
Last edited:
There are claims being made in Korean sources, so the possiblity does deserve some attention. While some of the arguments and evidence rely on either the original Snell report or the studies done by Robert Wilcox, there are certain independent studies with evidence from Hungnam workers who now reside in South Korea.

Also Newsweek once did a special report on the North Korean nuclear program, and I remember reading about the scientists/students/workers at Hungnam during the Japanese Occupation of Korea. Many personnel from before August 15, 1945 are supposed to have participated in the current N.Korean nuclear weapons program. Not to mention the alleged Japanese involvement in non-peaceful use of nuclear energy behind doors since 1954 to the present, the subject deserves an even closer study. This might be connected to the "conspiracy" that is shrouded behind all the cries of Japan being a "victimised nation."
 
Last edited:
IJN's Nuclear Testing at Hungnam & Two Nuclear Projects; but Three Testings ?

Three pieces of information say;

1) On board an unmanned naval ship off the seaport city of Hungnam 窶ケツサ窶愿ャ (Konan), the test bomb detonated, creating a "mushroom cloud," a "flash of light," and an "audible tone of explosion" visible/audible from 32 km away.
One source says this is recorded in a military intelligence report dated August 12, 1945. See map for Hungnam, on the east coast facing Eastern Sea in present day North Korea.


2) Another account point to Nagoya for a planned atomic testing which never happened.

3) Yet another account tells of a test-fire was in East Gobi desert, Hsingan province, China, with Unit 731 support.

Japanese development of nuclear energy several possible Japanese nuclear testings before August 15, 1945


What you say could be the case, however N.Korea, including Hungnam, was captured by the USSR, together with the plans, scientists, technicians, facilities, and materials if they existed. Either Truman was not aware of Hungnam's importance, underestimated the Soviets, or was too embarassed to make public the Japanese atomic program in Hungnam, Korea, code name "*NZ PROJECT."
Silverpoint said:
Yet, no one at the time, or since in an official capacity has ever used this argument that I'm aware of.
True, but the revised 1995 Robert Wilcox book seems to present some gov'tal/intelligence documents that support the Hungnam atomic bomb testing.

*NZ PROJECT is the term favored by Korean sources that also claim the code name was an exact copy of the German nuclear project. Acc. to William Pellas, however, there were two Japanese nuclear programs;

1. Project Ni IJ Army's effort, Headed by Nishina at Riken. This program was halted by the April 1945 B-29 firebombing raids of Tokyo.

2. Project F-Go What was left of Project Ni was folded into IJ Navy's program, authorised in 1943. Acc. to "Wakabayashi" it was the F-Go that acutally completed and test fired a single warhead utilising the facilities at Hungnam, Korea.


Hungnam 窶ケツサ窶愿ャ (Konan) where the alleged Japanese atomic bomb was developed and tested. One can see facilities of Choson Nitrogen Fertiliser Factory Co., a daughter company of Nippon Nitrogen Fertilzer Co., Tokyo.


Hungnam, following US air raids in the Korean War 1950-1953

edit: The third testing info regarding a test-fire of an atomic bomb in the Gobi desert appeared after original posting, and was added subsequently.
 
Last edited:
I just want to clarify at this point so that I know we're all on the same page. When I talk about "testing" to me this means actually detonating a bomb, not just trying to build one. I realise that this word could be interpreted in a number of ways, so I want to make sure we're all agreeing terms.
 
Definition of "Nuclear Testing"

Good point, Silverpoint. There have been quite misleading reports such as the one done by BBC in 2004 that S.Korea had conducted a "nuclear test."

S Korea chided for nuclear tests
11 November, 2004
BBC News While the "nuclear test" being referred to at the time involved only 0.7 grams of plutonium and 0.2 grams of a uranium isotope to study the chemical properties, the headline gave the impression of a "nuclear warhead detonating test" causing international uproars.

In the case of the alleged Hungnam "nuclear testing" it seems pretty clear from context that it is referring to a "nuclear warhead detonating test," not the chemical properties test in a chemistry-physics lab of micorscopic scale. But it's good that you raised the point to prevent any possible confusion, thanks. It is especially so because of the obvious historical implication a nuclear program conducted by Imperial Japan will have on the August 6 dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima. Now whether, and how much, the US gov't/military knew beforehand will in itself constitute a totally separate matter; still I agree with you that it is mandatory to excercise the greatest caution, whichever matter we are discussing.
 
Last edited:
There was also a German economic historian Rainer Karlsch who published Hitler's Bomb. He claimed that German scientists "set off a test explosion two months before the end of World War II, killing hundreds of people in eastern Germany." He also claimed that "the March 1945 device didn't achieve fission, but did scatter telltale radioactive particles at the Ohrdruf test site. It also claims that Nazi Germany briefly had a working nuclear reactor."

Book: Nazis Tested Crude Nuclear Device
Tony Czuczkam, March 14, 2005
Associated Press
 
Nipponese Nukes

The alleged nuclear testing off shore of Hungnam (Konan) is detailed in this essay. Since the Snell report came out in 1946, and Wilcox's Secret War is the 1st 1985 edition, the so-called 1947 USO Intelligence report must have been cited in Wilcox's 1985 book. Without primary evidence, however, Tittle's account might simply turn out to be positive statements of Wilcox's speculations.

Military History: Invasion Japan
Jim Tittle
2005-08-09 Copyright ©1996 - 2005 COMBATSIM.COM, Inc.
 
A whole lot of good spade work has been done. This is information for me to learn from, without doubt. I will study it as I have the time. Thank you guys for all this nice detail.

As for the actual bombings, and my feelings, I have no firm and fixed thoughts or conclusions. I just feel, that it happened in the 'heat of the battle', so to speak. I would strongly prefer that it had not happened. No war is for the better, no killing is either, but the social animal has it in the natural makings, it seems, to fight and, sadly, kill (not by honest error).

I sometimes wonder what 'turning the other cheek' would do for natural selection? :?
 
Kenpeitai, Unit731, and Special Operation Unit for Nuclear Research ?

Does anyone have additional information regarding a "nuclear research" in Manchuria in the later yrs of the Sino-Japanese War/WWII/Pacific War conducted by a Unit or Special facility such as one dircected by Unit 731 ?
With a general amnesty extended to former personnel at Unit 731 and the like in exchange for collaboration, there must be enough survivors to live and tell the details of the 'nuclear testing' if it happened. Why is there so little information ? What do we know about the Japanese nuclear experiments in the Gobi desert ? Were they all required to commit suicide to secure secrecy or are they keeping silence at the request of the US gov't ?

Kempeitai ナ停?コ窶「ツコ窶佚? Political Department and Epidemic Prevention Research Laboratory 窶塗窶ーu硏窶ケ窶?ツ焦?
Kempeitai Political Department ナ停?コ窶「ツコ窶佚?
Unit 731: Epidemic Prevention Research Laboratory 窶塗窶ーu硏窶ケ窶?ツ焦?
Special Operations Units

Units with special and Unknown assignments in Manchuria and the Asian mainland. It has been suggested that nuclear research was conducted in Manchuria towards the end of the war by this branch
 
Last edited:
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…