This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

窶凖環州ナス窶毒陳?Tongzhou Incident)

Do brutalities committed by one side of a conflict absolve the other?
 
Look, this has been raised so many times - it's a futile argument.

You can't compare 200 - 400 deaths in the Tongzhou Incident to 200,000 - 300,000 deaths in the Nanjing Massacre. It's like comparing classroom slaughter to genocide. When you get to this point, the rest of your above queries are entirely irrelevant.

I can't be bothered to rehearse material from the mother thread here on Japan's WWII atrocities when you're just too lazy to read: https://jref.com/showthread.php?t=16607&page=7#164

Please peruse the above thread.
 
Supervin said:
You can't compare 200 - 400 deaths in the Tongzhou Incident to 200,000 - 300,000 deaths in the Nanjing Massacre.

1) 200,000 and 300,000 is very wild guess number. Which is the actual number of death?

2) How do you know 200,000 people was dead?

2) So you don't care 200 - 400 death. All of Chinese does't care 200- 400 death too?

I think those Chinise and Japanese who killed inocent people is same. Both were ugly murder.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…