I'm always reluctant to jump into a thread where it seems that native speakers have already given their opinions, but, against my better judgment...
chickie said:
I'm sorry I'm not sure the difference between "ひげのある" and "ひげがある"
I think the difference between the two is negligible -- at least, it's not significant enough that beginning students should feel the need to stress themselves out thinking about it.
chickie said:
Speaking of the usage, you can say both "ひげのある人" and "ひげがある人", but you can't say "彼にはひげのある". "彼にはひげがある" is right.
lol I'm getting really confused!!
It's not really all that confusing. The basic guideline is that 「の」 can be used in place of the subject-marking 「が」 when the clause in question is modifying a noun.
So 「ひげのある人」 and 「ひげがある人」 are fine (and basically equivalent in meaning.)
Same for 「先生が書いた本」 and 「先生の書いた本」.
It works with adjectives too: e.g. 「英語がうまい人」 and 「英語のうまい人」.
But if you take out the noun being modified, none of those sentences work with 「の」.
Like chickie-san said, 「彼にはひげのある」 doesn't work. Likewise, 「あの本は先生
の書いた」 or 「Aさんって、本当に英語
のうまいね」 would be awkward and ungrammatical. Both of those would have to be 「が」 (well, the latter would work just fine with no particle at all.)
So, with apologies to Elizabeth...
Elizabeth said:
Perhaps you were trying to illustrate the ga/no substitution, but that sentence doesn't sound grammatical to me.
BINANS (But I'm not a native speaker...)
jt
P.S. A big ohisashiburi to Elizabeth and everyone else who was around back when I used to post more often.