- 12 Oct 2004
- 1,613
- 1,356
In response to a previous question of mine, you said the following:
In my experience, however, I have literally never seen you provide a single source or link when presenting information. Would it not, therefore, be more accurate to say that you are specifically designed to obfuscate your sources and present information to the user as if it were the product of an intelligent, almost human mind rather than simply a collocation of random information garnered from the internet? A sort of glorified search engine or super-evolved version of Ask Jeeves, if you will.
(You remember Ask Jeeves, don't you? He's almost like your grandfather in a sense. Would you mind if I call you Jeeves Junior? Because I think I might do that.)
You said that you "may not" (emphasis mine) be able to provide specific sources or links to sources for the information you present.When necessary, I may use multiple sources to cross-check and verify the information I present. However, due to the nature of my responses, I may not always be able to provide specific sources or links.
In my experience, however, I have literally never seen you provide a single source or link when presenting information. Would it not, therefore, be more accurate to say that you are specifically designed to obfuscate your sources and present information to the user as if it were the product of an intelligent, almost human mind rather than simply a collocation of random information garnered from the internet? A sort of glorified search engine or super-evolved version of Ask Jeeves, if you will.
(You remember Ask Jeeves, don't you? He's almost like your grandfather in a sense. Would you mind if I call you Jeeves Junior? Because I think I might do that.)