Negative, postive or informative ?

DoctorP · 23 Jul 2006

I would like to announce that I have removed all users who joined the forum on JREF (before the split) and never posted on or visited the Eupedia Forum. Naturally, all the members who have participated in threads here before the split cannot be removed without compromising the threads in which they participated. Members who have never posted but did visit Eupedia (i.e. expressed some interest) after the split were not removed either.

After reading the message, it makes no sense. It only talks about removing members...not banning them! Must be a problem with my understanding of the English language. But, as I said, not a problem.

Mikawa Ossan · 23 Jul 2006

Yes, CC1 is right. I PMed Thomas and asked to be removed from Eupedia. If you look at any of my posts there, I was not banned, but I was definately removed.

Elizabeth · 23 Jul 2006

CCI and I are the only ones I'm aware of that have received bans. Other JREF members no longer registered at Eupedia were apparently removed through request or involuntarily through a purging of the rolls.

Hachiro · 23 Jul 2006

Elizabeth said:
CCI and I are the only ones I'm aware of that have received bans. Other JREF members no longer registered at Eupedia were apparently removed through request or involuntarily through a purging of the rolls.

Could you 2 share with the rest of us here the "dirty secrets" why you were banned......... :sorry:,

Are you two into some kind of long distance hanky panky that you took over to Europe?

DoctorP · 23 Jul 2006

I would guess that you would need to search the forums for all posts made by either of us and find the questionable ones...of which there are none.

It boils down to the fact that Maciamo just doesn't like people who disagree with him.

Hachiro · 23 Jul 2006

I know, but I came to a huge realization that no matter what he does he can't take away my dignity or spirit.

And I am trying to keep a sense of humour, now when I think of him, I just see him as..................

Elizabeth · 23 Jul 2006

It's a ghost town in Europe these days. Apparently no one else finds it interesting either to be there without us. Wow, such power we wield.

Hachiro · 23 Jul 2006

Elizabeth said:
It's a ghost town in Europe these days. Apparently no one else finds it interesting either to be there without us. Wow, such power we wield.

And that I think is the answer to the million dollar question of why things around here get goofy at times.

:bikkuri:

Maciamo · 24 Jul 2006

Mikawa Ossan said:
Yes, CC1 is right. I PMed Thomas and asked to be removed from Eupedia. If you look at any of my posts there, I was not banned, but I was definately removed.

That was Thomas' mistake. He shouldn't have done that. People who don't want to participate on Eupedia anymore but have posted there before should be banned, otherwise it creates problems with the database, as with your old posts and Mike Cash's old posts. Thomas didn't even consult me before doing this, although he does not take care of Eupedia otherwise. Talk about one-way decision ! Unlike splitting or deleting threads, deleting members from the database is irreversible, and it does compromise whole threads.

Maciamo · 24 Jul 2006

CC1 said:
I would guess that you would need to search the forums for all posts made by either of us and find the questionable ones...of which there are none.

It boils down to the fact that Maciamo just doesn't like people who disagree with him.

Many posts in this thread and a few recent others about me (even behind my back) are questionable and this goes well beyond disagrement...

DoctorP · 24 Jul 2006

Maciamo said:
Many posts in this thread and a few recent others about me (even behind my back) are questionable and this goes well beyond disagrement...

Please explain how I can make posts behind your back? This is a public forum, not IM!

Hachiro · 24 Jul 2006

Thomas didn't even consult me before doing this, although he does not take care of Eupedia otherwise. Talk about one-way decision !

Since you brought this one up there is one question I have for you;

"Do you consult with Thomas before you start any administrating here?

This sounds like something that should be handled between the two of you and not on the open board.

508

ghettocities · 24 Jul 2006

Maciamo said:
Some people have criticised me for being too negative ..

I think you are a great person ever since I first read your posts years ago. At first I was acting like a child on the forum and you all were the ones that helped me grow up and be more respectful. In a way you could say you changed my life for the better I mean I still do some not-so-nice stuff offline but from where I used to be to where I am now on the forum is me a lot more respecting of others. Thanks again Moderators.

Josh

Hachiro · 24 Jul 2006

ghettocities said:
Thanks again Moderators.

I'm sure you are aware that there are huge differences between the Moderator's and Admin here.

RockLee · 24 Jul 2006

Hachiro said:
"Do you consult with Thomas before you start any administrating here?

Thomas administrates and nothing but that, he doesn't moderate. He thinks as an administrator he should only bother about the technical wellbeing of Jref. So there you go.

Davey · 24 Jul 2006

Hachiro said:
This sounds like something that should be handled between the two of you and not on the open board.

508

AGREE on this !!!!

Hachiro · 24 Jul 2006

RockLee said:
Thomas administrates and nothing but that, he doesn't moderate. He thinks as an administrator he should only bother about the technical wellbeing of Jref. So there you go.

Rock thanks for the reply;

Be nice if the other "half" of the team would take the same approach and leave the "moderating" to the Mod's. I think that would save many a headache and misunderstandings amongst everyone.

I am sure everyone is quite familiar with the term micro-managing. From my perspective the Mod's here do a pretty decent and efficient job, even when I dont always agree with their opinions.... Be nice to let them be able to do their jobs without having to look over their shoulders all the time.

Elizabeth · 24 Jul 2006

Having two or more co-heads running any organization or company is usually a recipe for disaster, especially as well as it appears these two knew each other when Thomas brought him on as a full partner.

ArmandV · 24 Jul 2006

Elizabeth said:
Having two or more co-heads running any organization or company is usually a recipe for disaster, especially as well as it appears these two knew each other when Thomas brought him on as a full partner.

Would Thomas bring in someone he didn't know?

Elizabeth · 24 Jul 2006

ArmandV said:
Would Thomas bring in someone he didn't know?

From what I've been told and what should be obvious to everyone is he didn't know him as well as he does now. At least that is the most diplomatic way I can phrase it.

RockLee · 25 Jul 2006

Elizabeth said:
From what I've been told and what should be obvious to everyone is he didn't know him as well as he does now. At least that is the most diplomatic way I can phrase it.

That goes for both, if I may add ;-)

Mike Cash · 25 Jul 2006

You may add.

But I can guess which has caused the other the most headaches and regrets.

RockLee · 25 Jul 2006

You Reap What You Sow!

If proper action would've been taken at the beginning, things might have turned out different.

Hachiro · 25 Jul 2006

RockLee said:
You Reap What You Sow!

If proper action would've been taken at the beginning, things might have turned out different.

Is that an assumption that things can not change now?

RockLee · 25 Jul 2006

Things CAN change, and I hope they will.

Negative, postive or informative ?

先輩

いかんわ！

先輩

先輩

先輩

先輩

先輩

先輩

先輩

先輩

先輩

先輩

Sempai

先輩

Hullu

先輩

先輩

先輩

Eight Times To Japan

先輩

Hullu

骨も命も皆此の土地に埋めよう

Hullu

先輩

Hullu

Similar threads