After 5 years of study, he should know them already. He said he knows enough but "couldn't cope with the presented format of the test." Makes me wonder what his class format has been all this time.There's no way you need to go off and try to memorise 2000 kanji for this test - that would be a waste of your time
After 5 years of study, he should know them already. He said he knows enough but "couldn't cope with the presented format of the test." Makes me wonder what his class format has been all this time.
In response to your comment, the testing formats are written and sometimes oral. Usually questions are one to two sentences following a prompt. (ex. write in the correct particles for Qs 10-13, then per Q there would be one sentence with x amount of blanks). Only recently have we started looking at large amount of texts (ex. the NHK website, Miyazawa Kenji's Ame Ni Mo Makezu) using kanji without hiragana above them or using only kanji within the chapter of a 1-2 page article. Also all of the text has been standardized with a certain font (ex. Times New Roman) so I found it more difficult to read the articles in the Quia example.After 5 years of study, he should know them already. He said he knows enough but "couldn't cope with the presented format of the test." Makes me wonder what his class format has been all this time.
I've seen on television before several instances of high school students visiting Japan after taking Japanese in their local school for up to three years....and have wondered the same thing every single time. That's why I remarked about it boggling my mind they can be under lower expectations than the near-zero expectations placed on foreigners who actually live here. Yes, he should know them but based on what I've seen I would place the lion's share of the blame on whomever has been teaching him for five years.
I had never heard of the NJE test before. I can't help but wonder if it is something North American teachers have gotten up to help mask the fact they've done such a crap job educating their students that they can only achieve so low on the JLPT it would call into question their performance as teachers. I noticed from their site that the certificates very much follow the typical modern American touchy-feely "everybody gets a trophy" pattern.
Thanks neko!There's no simple way of ranking kanji by "easiness". There's the order by which they're taught in school, and the JLPT order (from the old tests, the new test have no kanji "list" as such and are better for it).
With these sort of tests, it's not about how many individual kanji you know, it's about vocabulary, how you handle unfamiliar kanji/words in context, and how much practice you have with the type of material that appears in the test. For example, the JLPT is heavily non-fiction, often involving text like opinion pieces or advice columns. Therefore you get an advantage by practising reading that sort of material.
Here are some sample questions I found for the test (linked from what appeared to be the official page)
Quia - Class Page - NJE Sample Exams
The first thing that strikes me about the reading is that even level 3 doesn't appear to be very kanji knowledge heavy - they put furigana on 地震. There's no way you need to go off and try to memorise 2000 kanji for this test - that would be a waste of your time (I think it's a waste of time more generally, but that's another argument).
The second thing is that all the example questions have a similar theme:
1) Practical info - advice, guides, pamphlets, etc.
2) Picking out individual information, not necessarily reading and translating the whole thing.
Therefore the best method is to first read the questions, then go back to the text. For example, Q7 is "According to the brochure, what is a popular thing to do in summer?". Since it already gives you four possible options, all you need to do is look at the text relating to summer and decide which is the most likely.
Ask your teacher for similar practice reading materials, or more sample tests. These sort of materials are popular in textbooks so they might have some things on hand.
Thanks for the sites neko! As for the theme, I can't really think of any. The exam seems like it will pull from anything, so just different fonts would be the only thing I would be searching for.Ah, memories (of awful high-school French classes).
Poetry is all well and good, but what would be helpful (for the exam, and in general) would be to find reading material of a more practical nature. Non-fiction/educational material aimed at middle/high schoolers will use less kanji and is better than something all-kana aimed at five year olds.
Examples (I am happy to dig up stuff if you want to give me a theme to search on)
100 yen shop science experiments
the history of chocolate
A bunch of stuff about space (JAXA do do some nice public outreach).
What isn't uncommon is to see people struggle with timing on exams because they aren't used to reading. (Seems to be a common complaint with the JLPT). That you struggle with text that isn't in a font you're used to is a potential issue, but easily fixable with more exposure.
Thanks for the sites neko! As for the theme, I can't really think of any. The exam seems like it will pull from anything, so just different fonts would be the only thing I would be searching for.
This is also completely possible.I got the impression that at least some of the reading materials used in the exam are original creations made by the people who prepared the exams. The wording/phrasing of some of the content seems like it was specifically written for foreign learners of Japanese rather than for native speakers.
The biggest problem most learners have with the reading portion of tests is that they never get around to incorporating actual reading (as opposed to just learning how to read) into their studies. The only way to get better at reading Japanese is by reading Japanese. This many years into learning, I would have expected them to have you capable of reading things like magazine articles, short stories, and light novels by now.
If you perceive lack of familiarity with different fonts to be the problem, this is probably just a lack of familiarity with reading Japanese period and not the fonts. Fonts don't differ that much.
This is also completely possible.
I read it. Really inspiring stuff.I'd like you to read a couple of pages...it won't take you long...and let me know when you've read them. Once you know the background of this man, I'd like to share a little story about him.
Professor Robert Allen
The Education of Robert Allen
I read it. Really inspiring stuff.
I don't have much to say. Truer words have never been spoken.I'm from the same area as him and attended a local university at which he later was a professor. I learned of him when he was still a student at Bethel. The head of the psychology department at UTM told me the following anecdote about him about twenty years ago and Robert Allen's offhand remark has stuck with me ever since:
As you know, the first time the man was ever in a classroom as a student in his life was when he was in his thirties. Naturally, he knew nothing of school or campus life. Consequently, a fellow student was tasked with taking him around and getting him started. The student took Allen to the campus bookstore at the beginning of the term in order to buy the textbooks he would need for the classes he was taking.
Allen got the required books, then kept scooping up one after another books for courses he wasn't taking. The student told hm he didn't have to have those, that they weren't required for his classes. To which Allen replied, "I'm not going to let college interfere with my education".
If you want to learn Japanese, don't feel you have to be held back by your school's crappy Japanese program. There are abundant resources out there for rising above the low expectations of others.