Apropos Hearn's "Glimpses of Unfamiliar Japan," Basil Hall Chamberlain, the Meiji Era Japanologist, wrote: "Never perhaps was scientific accuracy of detail married to such tender and exquisite brilliancy of style."
Hearn's Tokyo house in Nishi-Okubo, now in Shinjuku Ward (Photos courtesy of Yokohama Archives of History)
High praise indeed, since accuracy and style are normally seen as incompatible; science embracing a clinical prose as objective as a lens, while style is the expression of the individual artist. But just how accurate was Hearn's writing?
Seeking an answer, I retraced part of Hearn's trip to Kamakura, as described in "Glimpses."
His rickshaw clattered to Engakuji on a spring day in 1890. Hearn was surprised by the temple's mammoth, two-storied gate. He noted the open-work of pillars and crossbeams, and the bird nests packing the eaves. He captured the gate's essence in observing the maze of beams inviting expectation of carvings of fanciful creatures, although "the majesty of the edifice could not have been strengthened by any such carving."