PaulTB said:
That's not so they can be assured of being able to _read_ Japanese though. It's on the assumption that at that level they will be able to hand in Japanese work which the _professors_ can read.
I'm not so sure that I agree with this, seeing as how the JLPT has sections that specifically test reading comprehension, vocabulary, etc. (i.e. passive understanding of Japanese) and nothing at all that tests essay-writing (active _production_ of Japanese). I could easily envision someone "cramming" and passing 1-kyuu without having the skills to write a reasonably intelligent academic paper in Japanese.
Cryptnotic said:
The whole idea of the JLPT is that if you can pass a certain level of the test, then you probably have a certain level of skill with the language.
::snip::
I don't know if this was a response to my post, but I'll answer anyway because this is a pet peeve of mine.
Yes, this is the _idea_, but this is more important to (for example) universities and companies trying to figure out who they can accept/employ than it is to the _individual_ who is learning Japanese. Sure, studying the grammar, vocab, etc. that is on the JLPT is one way to improve your Japanese, but it's not the only way by any means, and actually _taking_/passing the test is not a prerequisite to reading anything.
You'd hardly believe it from the way people talk the JLPT, but there are plenty of people who have achieved a very high level of Japanese ability without ever worrying about taking a proficiency test.
The bottom line: if you want to read something, just read it -- you can figure out for yourself whether or not it's within your abilities.