osias said:I don't use the word gaijin when i speak japanese, but on an English forum like this one, this word seems to show up quite frequently, and i somehow use the word on an English forum, because others use it. Is gaijin an english word already? I find it strange that many gaijins prefer to use this word gaijin, while many others complain about its racist connotations?
I myself grew up overseas in 4 different countries, i've been a foreigner most of my life time. But i don't take offense at being considered a foreigner, because i am! I like the aloofness, rootlessness, etc of a global nomad.
The connotation is not about nationality. As I said above, naturalised foreigners are still called "gaijin". But what bugs me most is that "gaijin" really means not belonging to the group, not knowing things Japanese people do, not being able to understand Japanese sensitivity... It means all this. That is why I say it is meant to exclude, in a negative way. When I hear gaijin, I hear "you will never be able to be like us", even if you speak Japanese and are naturalised Japanese. That is why I feel it has racist connotations.Damicci said:But isn't that the case? Unless they come up with new classifications for Non Japanese residents in Japan (e.g. American-Japanese, African-Japanese, Chinese-Japanese) Like we have here then thats what you are. Non Japanese, a foreigner. It's not like it's "really" meant to say "Hey you guys are not Japanese hahaha we shall label you hahaha" It's mainly classification. Unless I am missing something, there is no true intentional disrepect with the word. Just some Japanese can use it offensively if they choose.
This is just my opnion of course, but unless you want to be Japanese then that shouldn't be what you hear when the word is mentioned around you.Maciamo said:The connotation is not about nationality. As I said above, naturalised foreigners are still called "gaijin". But what bugs me most is that "gaijin" really means not belonging to the group, not knowing things Japanese people do, not being able to understand Japanese sensitivity... It means all this. That is why I say it is meant to exclude, in a negative way. When I hear gaijin, I hear "you will never be able to be like us", even if you speak Japanese and are naturalised Japanese. That is why I feel it has racist connotations.
Damicci said:This is just my opnion of course, but unless you want to be Japanese then that shouldn't be what you hear when the word is mentioned around you.
Maciamo said:Well I guess the problem is that I was trying hard to integrate into Japanese society, learn as much as could about the country, have a Japanese family, got a permanent residency, and still got called "gaijin" even by people who knew me very well ! It hurts somehow. They could just have said ツ青シ窶芭ツ人 or 窶ーツ「窶「テ?人 if they wanted to stress the fact that I was from Western or European origin. No need to use a word that means "outsider that will never belong here".
Damicci said:I am sure that sucks. I would figure after awhile terms would change and labels become different once you get to know someone. In your case Maciamo I think I woudl prefered to be call ニ但ニ陳?椎?ニ谷ツ人 over ナ?Oツ人ツ・ナ?Oツ坂?伉人. Especially when people know your origins and what not. Sorry to hear that.
RockLee said:You can see western people do that too, you know. When there's a Chinese or asian person those stupid people say something like "ching chang chong" or make karate moves with the sounds or act like total retards. It happens to me often when I tell people I'm studying Japanese and I've been there & to China. It's not only Asian people, we have our own load of ignorant westerners.
Ma Cherie said:After reading these posts I came to the conclusion that, I think the reason why foreigners have a problem with the word gaijin is possibly because whenever a Japanese person says "hey look, there's a gaijin!" to me, it seems like they have to make the point that you're not Japanese.
It's gonna be an absurdly strong reaction of some nature in any case. If you're ever there and walk down the street reading a Japanese paper, the stares are of shock, disbelief and often admiration, particularly with luggage clearly showing tourist ; if you're confident and look like you know what your business is, it's cowed amazement ; if it appears a foreigner is lost or is sure which direction to turn the wonder turns to patronizing pity and ridicule (more like you'll find in some small towns regardless).Ma Cherie said:After reading these posts I came to the conclusion that, I think the reason why foreigners have a problem with the word gaijin is possibly because whenever a Japanese person says "hey look, there's a gaijin!" to me, it seems like they have to make the point that you're not Japanese. This is possibly the reason why foreigners who live in Japan get offended, even though the word gaijin is supposed to be neutral. But if I lived in Japan, I wouldn't like it if I had to be reminded that I'm not Japanese.
Ma Cherie said:I can only imagine the frustration that foreigners must feel. I'm know it doesn't bother some people, but it bothers others. I understand that Japan is still fairly isolated, but that's no excuse for treating foreigners like they're something to be seen in a circus.
I've never been deliberately shown disrespect, I'm sure most of the behavior here is quite unconscious and culturally based. It also depends on the level of integration and expections from the non-Japanese side. The first 2-3 times I was there I didn't care who spoke to me in what language or didn't notice little tics and oddities that you start to question with time, I was so overwhelmed trying to digest and enjoy the experience itself. And gradually gotten used to the less savory aspects from that point forward.ArmandV said:From what I've seen, some foreigners look like they do belong in a circus.
Each time I've been in Japan, I've never been treated any way other than respectfully. Maybe some here were hanging out in the wrong sections.
It's about connotation and the way it is used and abuse, not the root of the word. How many times do you call someone who look different than you a foreigner without actually knowing whether they are ? It's automatic for Japanese people, and they use that word much too much. It's a national obsession.JimmySeal said:I think it's silly to think that the Japanese should invent a new word for "foreigner." What's insulting about "gaikokujin" is the way it's used, not its etymology. The word "foreign" comes from a Latin word meaning "outside," so foreigner is almost identical in meaning to gaikokujin.
Exactly.One probably notices after a little time in Japan that Japanese people use the word "gaikokujin" more than we would usually use the word "foreigner".
I don't think that Americans are in the best position to judge Japanese society on this because justly the USA is too diverse and multiethnic, and does not have a long-standing and fairly homogenous culture (everybody brings their own culture, as they say). Europeans may be better at comparing their country with Japan, as 50 years ago (before the decolonisation) Europe was more ethnically homogenous than Japan today. Some countries are more ethnically homogenous than others though (e.g. Nordic countries are more than France or the UK, even disregarding immigrants).I think the reason for this is simple. The Japanese at least believe themselves to be a homogeneous unmixed race, and almost all of them are asian-looking, so it's easy (they believe) to pick out the ones that aren't Japanese and refer to them as gaikokujin. In the US, we have a diverse mixture of races, and we can't tell by sight who lives there and who doesn't. We tend to group people by race: white, black, hispanic, Asian, Indian, and I think we'd be more likely to use the words "tourist" or "immigrant" rather than "foreigner."
One of the major things that trouble me about the use of "gai(koku)jin" is that it doesn't differentiate countries or regions of origins. All foreigners are alike for the Japanese. Gaijin are like this, gaijin are like that. Often, they mean "Westerners", but they could as well talk about Indians, Arabs, Chinese, Africans or Mexcians. In 4.5 years in Japan I have very rarely heard Japanese people call the people they were referring to by nationality (e.g. Indians), ethnic group (e.g. Caucasians) or linguistic group (e.g. English speakers). In 95% of the cases, it's just "gaijin". That's why I say it has such a strong connotation of "not ethnically nor culturally Japanese" rather than "foreigner".I personally would prefer to be called 窶昶?卍人 or 窶ーツ「窶「テ?人 rather than ナ?Oツ坂?伉人 but I doubt that's going to start happening.
because we dont know where they come from.All foreigners are alike for the Japanese. Gaijin are like this, gaijin are like that. Often
caster51 said:because we dont know where they come from.
if we know their nationality once, we call them ...jin
it is simple
for Example Zico is from brasil.
we never call him gaijin or gaikokujin.