This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Empress Michiko's Home

moyashi

後輩
Joined
15 Apr 2002
Messages
1,717
Reaction score
19
There is a movement going on to preserve and save Empress Michiko's home from destruction.

Although the land is worth 3.4 million, there is a movement going on to buy the house and land and reform it back to it's original.

 
I've read about that story. I'm sure that there are quite a lot of "uyoku" who'd be more than willing to preserve imperial belongings.


Seriously, it's a pity that some Japanese show such a disrespect for their cultural heritage. Money rules.
 
Large City Tokyo with little free land available, so I guess necessity rules.

hehe, if the "uyoku" did buy it they'd finally be doing something good for the general public instead of being their usual noisy-selves.
 
Empress has no inclination to keep old home

=> japantoday.com/e/?content=news&cat=1&id=237803

"No inclination" translates as "insufficient financial means". Michiko-sama's family is unwilling to pay the astronomical sum of 300 million yen in inheritance taxes that would have been due.
 
Funny thing...

My wife (who is a Japanese National) says that she should go ahead and sell the house to the highest bidder.

And I (an American) thought that it should be preserved by the government as a National Historical Site, and made into a museum.

:emoji_stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
 
I'm also in favor of conserving old buildings, especially in Japan,
where historic architecture is not held in high esteem.
 
From reading the Japan Times a few days ago, apparently there's a small town somewhere in Japan (I forget where) that is also trying to buy the house so that they can have it dismantled and re-assembled locally. I think it's a place where the Imperial family go on holiday or something.
 
I know it's an old thread, but I was glad to read that there IS civil resistance to the demolition of old architecture:

Mayor faces axe over destruction of historic building

The Toyosato Municipal Government had decided to demolish the building last year arguing that a study had shown that it was not strong enough to withstand a major earthquake. The school complex is an art deco building designed and built in 1937 by a prominent American missionary and entrepreneur, William Merrell Vories. [...]

Local residents then filed a criminal complaint with the prefectural police, accusing the mayor of willful destruction of property by ordering the workers to demolish the school building in defiance of the court's provisional injunction.

In response, police investigators search the building to see if they could charge the mayor. The mayor apparently bowed to pressure from local residents and abandoned his plan to demolish the building. Mayor Ono has since announced that he will preserve the building but insisted on constructing a new multi-billion yen school building in its compound to the conservationists' dismay.


mdn.mainichi.co.jp/news/20030108p2a00m0fp021001c.html

Clap, clap, clap!

 
They have finally started to dismantle the building, despite opposition.

Residents obstruct dismantling of Empress' family home

Dismantlement of Empress Michiko's parental home in a posh Tokyo area began on Thursday in spite of attempts to block the move by locals who want to preserve the house, officials said. The house of Hidesaburo Shoda, the Empress' father, was donated to the Ministry of Finance after his death in 1999.

=> mdn.mainichi.co.jp/news/20030116p2a00m0fp017000c.html

Demolition of empress's former home begins

=> japantoday.com/e/?content=news&cat=1&id=246055

 
Battle to save Tokyo landmark from bulldozers

Alex Kerr: "The supply of beautiful old buildings is not inexhaustible and the time may come in the not too distant future when Japan will have damaged its old cities beyond hope. Some fear that time is already here. . . Japan has become arguably the world's ugliest country."


=> telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;?xml=/news/2003/03/15/wjapan15.xml&sSheet=/news/2003/03/15/ixworld.html
 
Interesting thread as clearly both sides have a compelling argument re: urban sprawl vs. historic preservation. For myself, I tend to lean more towards preservation in cases like this and am saddened to hear of it ultimately being dismantled despite protests from the local community. At least the land will be used for a new park from which the locals may benefit from as opposed to say a simple parking lot (albeit that is an extreme example).
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…