Cherice Moralez and Stacey Dean Rambold consent case

[nahadef]

I was thinking hebephile or ephebophile but God knows you would not want to give an inch by entertaining any knew concepts. God forbid you learn, advance or even try to make sense of any this. Just keep stonewalling.

God forbid you acknowledge that children aren't adults.

Exactly what day is it okay for you, Zorro, to sleep with a child? 13 years, 364 days is too young, 14 years okay? Teens okay? So 12 years, 364 days is too young? Your argument is not an argument. The limits have been set, and you are shocked that the only people who might agree with you are pedophiles. I'm totally comprehending the situation. You refuse to accept that most people consider that to be too young, and insult anyone who disagrees.

The saddest thing is that I believe you honestly think you are fighting for social justice, when the truth is, all you're concerned about is your own personal sexual interests. Teachers can't sleep with their child students. That's the stonewall. You can't get that message in your head. You put your own sexual proclivities above a child's right to be a child. You should not be allowed to be around children.

 

[Mark of Zorro]

You should not be allowed to be around children.

You should not be allowed around children. Including your own.

Now:

Why do you insist on going over things we have been over before?

Why do you skip new questions and items to do that?

Why must you make this so very personal?

Could you stop flogging that dead horse?

Do you know why this girl committed suicide or have any relevant information about it? <--You really should answer this one.

 

[nahadef]

Why do you insist on going over things we have been over before?

Why do you skip new questions and items to do that?

Why must you make this so very personal?

Could you stop flogging that dead horse?

Do you know why this girl committed suicide or have any relevant information about it?

A) That you can't acknowledge children aren't adults? Well, you still can't grasp it.

B) Because all your questions are hoping for the answer that sleeping with children is okay.

C) Because you think sleeping with children is acceptable. That makes me very uncomfortable. You could be teaching my child in a number of years. That's horrifying. Your admission that teachers should be able to sleep with their children students is horrifying. Are you still teaching in Japan? If so, that's chilling to the bone.

D) Do you think sleeping with children is acceptable? Same answer.

E) I know she killed herself. I didn't know her, so, no, I have no relevant information. Even if I knew her, I still might not. Suicide is very complicated. Do you? Or is this yet another, 'Adults should be able to sleep with children' rant of yours, in this case trying to capitalise on the suicide of a troubled child, to satisfy your sexual proclivities? What right do you have to pull this child you never met into your argument to support your sexual tastes? This is most likely a new low for you. A child died, and you want to use it to support your sex drive. Do you have any relevant information whatsoever? A shred of info?

 

[nahadef]

When this thread started, I was disgusted at a pretty common level for Zorro's threads about how non-consensual sex was okay. With his recent replies, I'm pretty much appalled. I've never been a member of the thought police, but I'm going into the "danger to society" zone. How much does someone have to espouse sex with minors before they are removed from the situation?

This is not a new topic for Zorro. This is a multi-year pathology, which seems to be getting stronger as time goes on.

 

[thomas]

I'm closing this thread until I'm able to wrap my hand around how to handle this particular topic after a long day of work. While I am not opposed to allow the discussion of controversial topics, I'm not too amused about the personal attacks and the emotionality displayed.

Thanks for your understanding. I shall reply to all PMs in due time.