This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Casualty estimate for megaquake in Tokyo

thomas

Unswerving cyclist
Admin
Joined
14 Mar 2002
Messages
21,056
Reaction score
18,911
As if we needed that constant reminder: a disaster-prevention panel of experts working on behalf of the Tokyo Metropolitan Government estimates casualty rates of 6,200 if a megaquake strikes the capital.


Source: Asahi Shimbun



 
That's a really tiny number if you think about it. If it's true, your odds are very good.
 
I guess it depends on many other factors: where precisely the epicentre is, how deep, etc. I remember another study that predicted that eastern Tokyo (all reclaimed land) would be severely affected by liquefaction and tsunamis. All evacuation zones for Koto-ku, Edogawa-ku, etc., were in Chiba, Saitama, or western Tokyo, so basically far away.

And this was reported just today:

 
The Metropolitan government revised its numbers this week:

New estimates released on 19 December suggest that a powerful earthquake of magnitude 7 or higher hitting the Tokyo area could claim up to 18,000 lives and damage or destroy around 400,000 buildings. Those numbers are lower than projections made in 2013, when officials warned of roughly 23,000 deaths and more than 600,000 buildings lost in a similar scenario that has long been regarded as a matter of when, not if.

Officials have linked the improved outlook to steady gains in seismic retrofitting and fire-prevention efforts over the past ten years. Even so, the assessment also makes clear that the government has not met its own target of cutting overall damage by about half by the end of the 2024 fiscal year, highlighting the extent of vulnerability that remains despite years of preparation for a major quake in the capital region.



The Tokyo metropolitan area has about 2,500 hectares designated as high-risk earthquake zones, mainly due to the concentration of older wooden housing. While the size of these areas has been reduced by more than 80% over time, they remain a point of concern. Estimates indicated that a major earthquake beneath the capital could inflict economic losses totalling around 83 trillion yen, with roughly 45 trillion yen stemming from damage to homes and business premises and a further 38 trillion yen resulting from prolonged disruptions to production and services caused by extended power and water outages.

The assessment also examined the impact of a larger quake of magnitude 8, comparable to the Great Kantō Earthquake of 1923, which claimed more than 105,000 lives. Under the most severe scenario considered, the report suggested that deaths could rise to about 23,000 and that as many as 414,000 buildings might be destroyed or burned down, illustrating the scale of destruction that remains possible despite decades of disaster-prevention efforts.

 
I wonder if those estimates would result in any migration to the suburbs/country where there would be potentially less chance of injury?
 
I wonder if those estimates would result in any migration to the suburbs/country where there would be potentially less chance of injury?
I doubt it. There was no observable shift after the 2011 earthquake, when parts of eastern Tokyo suffered from liquefaction. I really don't understand people who buy expensive apartments in the sky in places like Toyosu and Harumi, when the country is so vulnerable to earthquakes (which can make water supplies and elevators inoperable), storm surges due to tsunamis, and sea-level rises. I'm glad I live a long way inland.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…