That's what I have. It's a neat little camera, and easy to use, but there are many cool functions you can play around with.Alma said:like, i just found on net Canon PowerShot A520 and i fell in love with it...
misa.j said:That's what I have. It's a neat little camera, and easy to use, but there are many cool functions you can play around with.
WHEATTHlNS said:You can get both online through EBAY for fairly cheap (especially if you're buying from AMERICAN EBAYERS) -
However - if youre deadset on the A520 its a good camera and only uses 2AA batteries versus the 4 of most other older (and by older I mean one year older) models. So if money isnt an object (and the A520 really isnt that expensive) - you'll be MORE than set with this as a picture/movie taker.
better than what you can get for $500 USD in the states.
It's like this :WHEATTHlNS said:Uh - hows that now. . .youre saying a 300 dollar camera in JAPAN is going to be of better quality than a 500 dollar camera in the US (not that shes able to buy in the US anyway - but just curious on this logic here).
RockLee said:It's like this :
Japan , camera brand Canon , price 35000yen
America : camera brand 'fill in brand' , price 500$
Now, the cheaper camera can be of better quality than the expensive one in America.You understand now ?
Alma said:@ArmandV, i do also love my old camera, but now for me would be great and convenient to have digital... ill name just two things: my friends and family are spreaded all around the world, its easier to send them pictures via e-mail, also planing to take part in some concourses etc, also, digitals have more options...
ArmandV said:While it may be true that you can more speedily email photos with a digital camera, but we film types can do the same. Many photo labs can put your prints on CD-ROM for you. Also, I can scan my own prints and edit them at the same time before sending them around.
What other options do you speak of? I have toyed with buying a digital camera, but thus far I don't see anything they can do that I can't do now.
i have an a75, great camera. only 2 things i don't like about it.WHEATTHlNS said:If youre not a professional photog - or really anyone that needs that extra resolution - the A75 3MP is MORE than sufficient for what you are no doubt looking to do. But the A400 is even more basic (but no slouch at all in the output department). I have the A75 and though the A95 (with the cool swivel panel) looks awesome, I dont really have a need to upgrade right now for the ability to see what Im about to take a picture of (although for some shots I can see how that would be crucial).
You can get both online through EBAY for fairly cheap (especially if you're buying from AMERICAN EBAYERS) -
However - if youre deadset on the A520 its a good camera and only uses 2AA batteries versus the 4 of most other older (and by older I mean one year older) models. So if money isnt an object (and the A520 really isnt that expensive) - you'll be MORE than set with this as a picture/movie taker.