- 30 Apr 2007
- 1,173
- 84
Is that your translation or a version provided by the book???So I'm a high-beginner low-intermediate. Right now I'm self-studying until language classes start up again in the fall. If I find a suitable summer program I may jump on it but until then its just me, my books and my language exchange partners.
Lately I've been having trouble understanding casual speech and formulating casual speech. I found some examples in my conversation book that mimic a small problem I'm having with the (to me) elusive の。
会ったことがあるのかあの男に
Have you met that man before?
Up until now, my studies have provided me with a few usages for の. One is possession, another is nominalization. I'm not sure how this fits in. How does the above sentence differ from:
会ったことがあるかあの男に
(Is it even still correct without the の?)
から is since or because and isn't necessary but by providing the reason it was suggested not to buy does add a basis of reason and objectivity to the speaker's argument. Comparable in English to : "Although I said not to buy it because it was so expensive, you did anyway !???"Another example:
あんなに高いからって言ったのに、買っちゃtったの、あなたは。
Even though I told you it was so expensive, you bought it didnt you?
I understand that the first の, part of のに, means 'in spite of' or 'even though', but how does the second one work? Same problem as the first sentence, whats the idea behind it? I know literal translations aren't always a possibility but there must be some thought process behind it that's mimicked some other way in English.
Also, the からって言った, why is it necessary to have the から there? Again, up to this point から for me can mean since/because, or with verb+て+から it can mean 'after doing' but here I'm a little lost. I know the translation isn't literal but I can't find an 'idea' or 'thought' for it in the English counterpart. Why not just:
あんなに高いと言ったのに。。。
Even though I said it was so expensive...
(that's probably completely wrong but.. why??)
Extremely common. Even in desu, masu, not so colloquial speech.One last question, how common is the replacement of the 'と' particle with the coloquial って? I'm constantly listening for 'と' in conjunction with 言う or 思う but I think I'm hearing this って business instead, and its throwing me off.
I didn't mean to suggest feminine is only for women. A sentence ending ka directly following the plain form of a verb is unacceptably harsh or "tight" sounding to many men as well....Thanks for the quick responses!
Damicci yes you're right but this portion of my studies is highlighting how in casual conversation the clause order is quite loose and can change. In a more formal situation I agree you'd use the 'wa' phrase first I think. Also, are you saying 'no' can be a question particle like 'ka' in casual Japanese?
Elizabeth I see what you mean. So the 窶堙 is sometimes used simply as a softener in the feminine diction? And therefore I need not concern myself with it so much but perhaps train my ears to listen for it?
It's more of a feminine thing but a lot of men use it too with a rising tone in question form. I think women & children may be more apt to end sentences with の for emotive or explanatory emphasis.I often hear women saying verbの but I don't know for sure if it is a feminine thing. MY dictionary says it is more of a feminine way of asking a a question. Yes の is often used as a question particle.
Update: weird rikai chan used to (fem) question (sentence end)
Now it says "indicates question" (sentence end)
So I am pretty sure in this case it is replacing ka as the question particle.
Chau/chatta has come to be used largely by girls or women, and it is very casual usage some may consider cute or childish. I won't comment on that.Yes these are examples from my book, not my own, and yes I also think these are examples of softer femenine diction because of the 'chatta' inserted into 買う. My female exchange partner does this, but I was laughed at by my guy friends when I tried to use it. I thought it was genderless!
I'd have to think about that more. Just realize that before a phrase, clause or full sentence which presents an alternate to what has gone before I don't believe か can be used. You need to separate them, in this case, with それとも ?会ったことがあるのかぜんぜん見なかった、あの男に。
Have you met before, or never seen, that man?
There are much more in depth threads than I have time for now, but to cut to the bone, if there is no question implied, declarative sentences ending in the の(だ、です)、conversationally abbreviated to ~んです、 pattern are normally used to convey an explanatory nuance or tone. If a reason for the behavior is called for in the question or the question carries an emotive undercurrent, asked in surprise, anger, disappointment, etc. it is also ended in this grammar.If there's no question, like kacchattano, it's just a simple softener of sorts found at the end of verbs both regular and stative (and then if it WAS a question you could add ka)
Yes I've got it. So, convceivably, I should listen for any one of the following:今は忙しいの(んだ)。(It's because I'm busy now...). Note this sounds very feminine. Most men would tack on a だ after the の。
If you're talking to men, yes. Of course they could also substitute です for だ and women also use んだ、んです。 nonda doesn't exist as far as I know. :?Yes I've got it. So, convceivably, I should listen
今は忙しいnonda
This last one seems strange to read but I can see its progression.
Also I think the の before かな is a little unusual since it appears to show great interest in the subject. I really wonder what that stuff in the cup is....type feeling.かな I think is more of a "I wonder" modifier
To me IMHO that sentence looks more like "I wonder what is in there?"
Going for a trial lesson at a Japanese convo. school on monday, I'm hoping it ends up being the kind of place where I get exposed to this stuff on a regular basis and it starts to sink in. Crossing my yubi's!
Elizabeth said:If it is "Have you met before ? That man...." then の is inserted as a polite 'softener' which gives it a slightly more rounded, feminine sound. But it is often left out conversationally as part of an embedded question with no problem whatsoever.
It is necessary, on the other hand, if the sentence seems to be referring to two separate people. の acting now a "stand in" or "place holder" particle for "the one" (aforementioned), か as "or," and あの男に as "that man." Putting all these elements together it becomes "Is it the one you've met before OR (for, to) that man?" which doesn't really look conceivable with the に ending but just for illustrative purposes....
No, using の is not "strictly male," but it's true that it used less by male.Lizzy said:From what I hear there it is strictly male.
Thanks guys
Actually as I was looking through my lang.x notes I found a question I'd written down:
何が入っているのかな。
This question was referring to a cup on a table.
So the 入っている is the finished intransitive state of entering, (something entered the cup, and it's still "entered") and the の is a 'softener', and か or かな are standard question endings?
Is there some rule as to when its natural to add the の as a softener? And why add かな if the の can be a question particle? I suppose it can't do both right?
Thanks guys
Actually as I was looking through my lang.x notes I found a question I'd written down:
何が入っているのかな。
This question was referring to a cup on a table.
So the 入っている is the finished intransitive state of entering, (something entered the cup, and it's still "entered") and the の is a 'softener', and か or かな are standard question endings?
Is there some rule as to when its natural to add the の as a softener? And why add かな if the の can be a question particle? I suppose it can't do both right?
会ったことがあるのかあの男に
Have you met that man before?
Close! It's the opposite. の is the one that nominalizes the words precedeng it.The の that you're talking about is a noun that is nominalised by everything before it.
Close! It's the opposite. の is the one that nominalizes the words precedeng it.
As undrentide-san explained in the cited thread and was discussed above, の as a question ending particle is very often tacked on as a slightly feminine softener. Reading in an emotive emphasis depends on the situation. Could be asked out of surprise, curiousity, in a slightly suspicious, demanding etc tone but that isn't something at all inherent in the particle or grammar itself.To understand this sentence properly we'll first fix up the word order...
あの男に会ったことがあるのか
The の that you're talking about is a noun that is nominalised by everything before it. Basically it's a relative clause. When it's in a question it translates to "is it that...?" and when it's in an answer/explanation form it translates to "it is that...". So the above sentence literally translates to "Is it that you've met that man?" (maybe the previous sentence somehow indicated that the person has met this man before and his friend now wants more information, thus asking this question).