Nuala
Hell's Finest Daughter
- 15 Jul 2004
- 1,725
- 39
There have been some comments made in regards to people being able to choose whether or not their children will be heterosexual, or homosexual. I feel that the opposite decision should be making headlines. "Would you make your child a heterosexual?"
Face it, people, we are suffering from an overpopulated planet. We do not have enough resources to sustain our species. As such, it's our duty to cull our species for the sake of the greater good. Now, nobody is going to condone the genocide of any single racial or cultural group. I know I would not support that, but there are other ways than killing the current occupants of the world.
We could simply have it so where children cannot be born until this resource problem is resolved. Would you allow your child to be born heterosexual into this world, fully knowing that the children they have will have a harder time finding work, feeding themselves, and so forth than their parents? It's like giving birth to a child in an irradiated wasteland, would you actually punish your children and grandchildren like that? Imagine the world they'd have to suffer through.
Face it, people, we are suffering from an overpopulated planet. We do not have enough resources to sustain our species. As such, it's our duty to cull our species for the sake of the greater good. Now, nobody is going to condone the genocide of any single racial or cultural group. I know I would not support that, but there are other ways than killing the current occupants of the world.
We could simply have it so where children cannot be born until this resource problem is resolved. Would you allow your child to be born heterosexual into this world, fully knowing that the children they have will have a harder time finding work, feeding themselves, and so forth than their parents? It's like giving birth to a child in an irradiated wasteland, would you actually punish your children and grandchildren like that? Imagine the world they'd have to suffer through.
