Kirakira1232
素敵な冒険始まる!
- 6 May 2008
- 472
- 16
I got a friend to loan me a CD. ORMy friend loaned me a CD
Tomodachi ni (watashi ga) CD wo kashite moraimashita
I was loaned a CD from my friend.
Or sometimes "kara." And only "kara" when the giver is a non-person (company, country, etc).With morau the receiver is the subject and so the giver is marked by "ni".
Morau isn't necessarily at all something the giver was influenced to do in any way. It simply implies receiving an object or favor and that the action of giving is perceived from the receiving end....What I got from them rather than what they did for me (kureru). It may be easier to remember this way : A -te morau sentence centers on the receiver. A -te kureru sentence centers on the giver as the main actor/protangonist.While Morau has you asking previously for the "thing' to be given to you.
I got a friend to loan me a CD. OR
I received a CD from my friend.
Or sometimes "kara." And only "kara" when the giver is a non-person (company, country, etc).
Morau isn't necessarily at all something the giver was influenced to do in any way. It simply implies receiving an object or favor and that the action of giving is perceived from the receiving end....What I got from them rather than what they did for me (kureru). It may be easier to remember this way : A -te morau sentence centers on the receiver. A -te kureru sentence centers on the giver as the main actor/protangonist.
Does that make it come together a little better for you ?
Right !Yes that makes it clearer now...Kureru is more centered on the action of the giver whereas morau centres more on the recipient actually "receiving" from someone....if that makes ANY sense at all...
I will get my friend to buy this sweater for me.Ah~! Very good point on kara. That wasnt mentioned at all...
Yes that makes it clearer now...Kureru is more centered on the action of the giver whereas morau centres more on the recipient actually "receiving" from someone....if that makes ANY sense at all...
Something like
Tomodachi ni kore no SETAA wo katte moraimasu
I got my friend to buy this sweater for me
Another interpretation besides Elizabeth's.Tomodachi ni kore no SETAA wo kate moraimasu
Okaasan wa otousan ni hirugohan (I try to avoid gairaigo...) wo ageta.ageru
In this sense the giver is marked by "wa" and the receiver is marked by "ni"
haha wa chichi ni RANCHI wo ageru
Mum gave dad his lunch.
This is getting complicated for my lunch hour (starting to lose some appetite....Because ageru, morau and kureru are verbs...can they be used with forms such as ~te hoshi. Tatoeba..."agete hoshi"...or "I want you to give" or something like that?
Charity ni okane wo agete hoshi
I want you to give to charity.
Or would agetai be suitable?
Tasukete kurete arigatou gozaimashita~! (I think I used it correctly lol)
Thanks for teaching me
Another interpretation besides Elizabeth's.
Tomodachi ni kono SE-TA- wo katte moraimasu.
I will get my friend to buy my sweater.
(My friend will buy this/my sweater from me.)
As for "kureru", the receiver should be the speaker or the person/thing on the speaker's side.
彼は妹に花を買ってくれた。
Kare wa imouto ni hana wo katte kureta.
彼は妹に花を買ってあげた。
Kare wa imouto ni hana wo katte ageta.
The former "imouto" should be MY sister. On the other hand, the latter one would be his (or the third person's) sister.
One more example
その日お父さんはお母さんに花を買ってくれたの?
Sono hi otousan wa okaasan ni hana wo katte kureta no?
Did dad buy a flower for mum on that day?
Probably the speaker would be asking his/her mother this question.
その日お父さんはお母さんに花を買ってあげたの?
Sono hi otousan wa okaasan ni hana wo katte ageta no?
As for this sentence, the speaker would be asking his/her father.
Okaasan wa otousan ni hirugohan (I try to avoid gairaigo...) wo ageta.
Okaasan wa otousan ni hirugohan wo kureta.
You can see that the content of these is identifical, right ? The difference is in the first one the speaker is "siding with" okaasan and in the second expresses more of an identification for otousan....At least that is my basic understanding/impression.
I'm not sure it should be used for receiving among family or "ingroup" members though....
This is getting complicated for my lunch hour (starting to lose some appetite.... ) but these may be softer and more natural than "agete hoshii" alone.
Charity ni okane wo (agete) hoshii/moraitai to omou/omoimasu.
Charity ni okane wo agetara/kuretara ii noni(naa) to omou/omoimasu.
(Anata ni) charity ni okane wo (agete) hoshiin/moraitain desu. This sounds too direct to me...
Ah, no, no, sorry for my ambiguousness.Ah hah~! So in "Kare wa imouto ni hana wo katte kureta" he is specifically talking about someone giving towards people to him or in his family whereas in "Kare wa imouto ni hana wo katte ageta" the "ageta" signifies the recipient is someone else's sister (outside his "In group")
The nuance in the second two sentences are perhaps not as obvious to me right now...I will wager a guess. Kureru and Ageru both mean "to give", Because the speaker is speaking to the "receiver" he/she uses "kureru" and when he is talking to the "giver" he/she uses "ageru". I know that seems rather simplistic ><
And if the speaker is performing this action, it SHOULD be 買ってやった ですね。彼は妹に花を買ってあげた。
Kare wa imouto ni hana wo katte ageta.
The former "imouto" should be MY sister. On the other hand, the latter one would be his (or the third person's) sister.
Ah, no, no, sorry for my ambiguousness."Te-form + kureru" means "the subject does something for me/the speaker."
彼は花を買ってくれた。
Kare wa hana wo katte kureta. ("Kare" is NOT the speaker.)
He bought me a flower./He bought a flower for me.
彼は妹に花を買ってくれた。
Kare wa imouto ni hana wo katte kureta.
He bought a flower for MY(THE SPEAKER'S) sister.
彼は妹に花を買ってあげた。
Kare wa imouto ni hana wo katte ageta.
He bought a flower for HIS(or the third person's) sister.
(This "imouto" is considered not on the speaker's side.)
The speaker asks on the listener's position in the last two sentences in my previous post.
Sono hi otousan wa okaasan ni hana wo katte kureta no?
"katte kureta"; because the speaker asks on the listner(mother)'s position, the reciver
Sono hi otousan wa okaasan ni hana wo katte ageta no?
"katte ageta"; because the speaker asks on the listener(father)'s position, the giver
So the former one can be also said as
その日お母さんはお父さんに花を買ってもらったの?
Sono hi okaasan wa otousan ni hana wo katte moratta no?
Because the listner(mother)'s position is the reciver
Although I've often seen the choice of verb as "kureru" when the listener is the one doing the action or giving the favor.
Asking your father : "Have you such-and-such to mother XXX Kuremashitaka?"
Again, it must be rooted in the general rule of "kureru" going in the direction outgroup-->ingroup as the receiver of a person identified with the speaker. Although why that is supposed to be mother over father in the example is still not entirely understood.
As I understand it, ageru cannot be used when the listener is the giver, unless he/she happens to be a close friend or family member of the speaker. Conversely, I didn't think that "kureru" could ever be used when the listener was the receiver...Hmm thats what puzzled me a little bit when I saw that too because kureru and ageru both mean to give, but I guess it makes sense in terms of "the giver" and "the receiver" since both the mother and the father you would assume to be both within the speakers "In group".
I had meant to say that I understood that kureru refers the giving being done towards a person within the speaker's "In group" and that ageru refers to giving to a person outside the speaker's group. But this still made things quite clear
If I understood this correctly...Kureru means "to give" but it places more emphasis on the person receiving the action or thing. Ageru also means to give but places more emphasis on the person giving the action or thing.
So the speaker in the first sentence is using kureru/morau because he/she is speaking on the position of the receiver and he/she is using ageru in the second sentence because he/she is speaking in the position of the person giving the action.
"Yatta" sounds more "rough" than "ageta".And if the speaker is performing this action, it SHOULD be 買ってやった ですね。
When asking for the listener to do something for me(the speaker), right, "kureru" would be used.Although I've often seen the choice of verb as "kureru" when the listener is the one doing the action or giving the favor.
Asking your father : "Have you such-and-such to mother XXX Kuremashitaka?"
Generally, yes. That's just the reason I selected the terms "imouto/otousan/okaasan" in my examples.But at least "ageru" implies the parties involved are of approximately the same social standing, except when you're doing something for other people's kids or your pets.... Terms like ingroup and outgroup are too obscure, only lead to misunderstandings and I'm going to stop them right now.
Thank you !the third person (not the speaker) is the giver
the listener is the receiver
the listener is in the speaker's side
In this case, "kureru" can be used like my examples.
その日お父さんはお母さんに花を買ってくれたの?
Sono hi otousan wa okaasan ni hana wo katte kureta no?
(ask to my sister) 彼は花を買ってくれたの?
Kare wa hana wo katte kureta no?
Did he buy the flower for you?
No, yaru was formerly used perfectly appropriately for younger siblings. Now considered "ranbou" except perhaps by (some) men or post-war women, under the age of 60-70, is that about right?. And as a replacement ageru has feminized or softened the implication of giving just as radically in the opposite direction IMO. You can even find "shokubutsu ni ageru."I heard yatte or yarimasu is something that you would use towards things that are much much lower standing than you are or inanimate objects
eg.
Kyou hana ga mizu wo yatta
I watered my flowers today.
Kinou Inu ga DOGU FUUDO wo yarimashita
I fed my dog yesterday.
My teacher however remarked that she is seeing more and more Japanese using ageru when "giving" things to pets or inanimate objects. Maybe its a sign of affection?
Thank you everyone for your awesome explanations
Kyou, hana ni mizu wo yatta.Kyou hana ga mizu wo yatta
I watered my flowers today.
Kinou Inu ga DOGU FUUDO wo yarimashita
Right.So...in short, when giving takes place between two parties not involving the self, asking the speaker if they have "XXX kuremashitaka?" (Suzukisan ni purezento wo kuremashitaka?) works well to define that person as the derelict party, on the other side of the fence, in the "outgroup" camp (if I dare say...).
But asking the speaker if they have "agemashitaka" (Suzukisan ni purezento wo agemashitaka?) is not necessarily limited to a relatively close friend or family...For example a generic question asking classmates, teachers, colleagues 窶堋サ窶堙娯?愿コ窶堙俄?ーツス窶堋ゥ窶堙?窶堙ァ窶堋「窶堙懌?堋オ窶堋ス窶堋ゥツ?窶堋?窶堋ー窶堙懌?堋オ窶堋ス窶堋ゥツ?
The opinion is divided even among native speakers.My teacher however remarked that she is seeing more and more Japanese using ageru when "giving" things to pets or inanimate objects. Maybe its a sign of affection?
It isn't only a problem of affection. You can find ageru used for wild animals, zoo animals, other people's pets, down to even birds and goldfish lol. And not unusually plant feed or water.Yeah because "ageru" kind of signifies you and your pet are at the same level I guess huh so its much more affectionate to say ageru
They still insisted we use yaru when "giving" things to our dogs or plants for the tests/exams. In my opinion it should be OK to use both when referring to pets/plants if your quite affectionate about them.
You've got it! Sorry if my response was a bit confusing. It is just that explaining grammar is not my forte...