The plaintiffs claimed that the central government was liable for "obstruction of proof." The state refuted this by citing the Code of Criminal Procedure, which specifies that "a request for a retrial does not have the effect of suspending the execution of a sentence." It expanded on its counterargument, saying, "There is no legal obligation to refrain from executing an individual during a request for retrial, and it does not constitute a violation of the right to counsel." The practice of waiting to execute death row inmates awaiting retrial occurred for some time after World War II, taking the possibility of wrongful convictions into consideration. However, criticism over "life extension" grew as many death row inmates began to request retrials. The execution of a death row inmate awaiting retrial in 1999 was the single outlier until 2017, when a series of executions were carried out.