The owner of the Ohi nuclear power plant, Kansai Electric Power, has been asking residents to save electricity ahead of a hot summer and it has been planning rolling blackouts to cut energy usage. But blackouts were extremely unpopular, especially among factory owners, when they were imposed in Tokyo last year and Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda has repeatedly said that it's crucial for the nation's economy to restart some nuclear reactors.
Despite the severe power shortages that Japan faces, many people are still against today's decision to restart the two Ohi power plant reactors and there have been protests against the decision. Some local politicians, including Osaka mayor Toru Hashimoto, say their approvals have been limited to the Ohi plant and only during the hot summer months. But the prime minister has said he will continue to assess whether other nuclear reactors are safe to be restarted.
I think the "nukes" in the picture actually refer to nuclear reactors. I'm far from being an expert, but I believe Japan could have done without.
Why the heck was the "setsuden" drive stopped after just a few months? Why were the "rolling blackouts" never really implemented nationwide?
I'm sure that most of the Japanese are willing to compromise and to sacrifice in order to keep the "nukes" offline. Supercool biz, a reasonable adjustment of working hours, ice packs and a few pennies more for electricity would have made it possible. Yet, it was the nuclear lobby that wouldn't compromise. Another chance missed. Same old, same old.
Of course there's nothing wrong with trying to save energy, but why unnecessarily put a strain on Japan's other power sources?
Because after having taken all 52 reactors offline in the wake of last year's disaster an eventual phase-out of nuclear energy should have been the next logical step. Japan owes it to the people of Fukushima, and we all owe it to future generations, who have to pay for our greed and short-sightedness.
Nuclear energy is not clean. It is not cheap. And it is not safe. True, conventional power generation isn't any cleaner, and alternative energy sources are not sustainable yet, but this country's administration has just - IMHO - taken a step back.
Public protests of the kind we have seen today are an encouraging sign of change and civil discontent.
Most spent fuel Ross are kept in either cooling pools near the reactor or more recently in dry casks but still usually on site at the power plant.
There really isn't some big secret. In America at least, after the waste has been sitting above ground for 10-50 years they are transported to an underground location. A one-gigawatt water-moderated reactor only produces about 21 tons of radioactive fuel a year anyway, so we're not looking at a lot of waste. In countries like France all of the spent fuel is reprocessed and reused, cutting down significantly on waste.
I'm for restarting the newer and better-situated plants, but the older ones should never, ever, come back online.
And even then, there should be a shutdown and total phase-out plan in place.
It sits above ground on site for that long since there's no real solution to the waste problem. Nobody wants or will accept it right away (so it sits on site), and nobody even wants it after that, when it will basically remain to be a waste problem forever.
Sorry, I did not understand. Did You mean 'fuel rods'?
BTW, that could not be a true. Usually, powerplant is changeing rods once an year, and old one coud do it more frequently. Rod should be cooled about 10 years before it could be moved to a dry cask storage. It is mostly impossible to find information about how big is capasity of cooling pools on plant side, and ... dry cask is quite huge vertical consturction - how many of them did You see? Get google maps and study satellite pictures of powerplants. By the logic, there should be many of dry casks around power plant, there are not too many of them. Looks like rods are disappearing somehow from powerplants. Where and how?
Japan approved on Monday incentives for renewable energy that could unleash billions of dollars in clean-energy investment and help the world's third-biggest economy shift away from a reliance on nuclear power after the Fukushima disaster.
Industry Minister Yukio Edano approved the introduction of feed-in tariffs (FIT), which means higher rates will be paid for renewable energy. The move could expand revenue from renewable generation and related equipment to more than $30 billion by 2016, brokerage CLSA estimates.
Utilities will pay 42 yen (53 U.S. cents) per kilowatt hour (kwh) for solar-generated electricity, double the tariff offered in Germany and more than three times that paid in China.
Wind power will be subsidized at least 23.1 yen per kwh, compared with as low as 4.87 euro cents (6 U.S. cents) in Germany.
read the whole article
Davey, russian proverb says: "You will blow on cold water after getting burns with hot milk".
Davey, russian proverb says: "You will blow on cold water after getting burns with hot milk".
I think that total denial from nuclear energetics is very silly thing. That is very good source of energy and people should use it.
"In any reactor, a SCRAM is achieved by a large insertion of negative reactivity. In light water reactors, this is achieved by inserting neutron-absorbing control rods into the core, although the mechanism by which rods are inserted depends on the type of reactor. In PWRs, the control rods are held above a reactor's core by electric motors against both their own weight and a powerful spring. Any cutting of the electric current releases the rods. Another design uses electromagnets to hold the rods suspended, with any cut to electric current resulting in an immediate and automatic control rod insertion. A SCRAM mechanism is designed to release the control rods from those motors and allows their weight and the spring to drive them into the reactor core, in four seconds or less, thus rapidly halting the nuclear reaction by absorbing liberated neutrons. In BWRs, the control rods are inserted up from underneath the reactor vessel. In this case a hydraulic control unit with a pressurized storage tank provides the force to rapidly insert the control rods upon any interruption of the electric current, again within four seconds. A typical large BWR will have 185 of these control rods. In both the PWR and the BWR there are secondary systems (and often even tertiary systems) that will insert control rods in the event that primary rapid insertion does not promptly and fully actuate."
I think the "nukes" in the picture actually refer to nuclear reactors. I'm far from being an expert, but I believe Japan could have done without.
Why the heck was the "setsuden" drive stopped after just a few months? Why were the "rolling blackouts" never really implemented nationwide?
I'm sure that most of the Japanese are willing to compromise and to sacrifice in order to keep the "nukes" offline. Supercool biz, a reasonable adjustment of working hours, ice packs and a few pennies more for electricity would have made it possible. Yet, it was the nuclear lobby that wouldn't compromise. Another chance missed. Same old, same old.
thats not true, japanese is an export nation and they already have trouble with high oil prices and expensive yen. not to talk about the aging population and china wich is taking away from japans former dominant market position in the far eastern asian countries. its not that nuclear power is unsafe, as they showed many times corruption made fukushima possible and not nuclear power itself.