This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

LDP pushes flag desecration bill, experts doubt need

thomas

Unswerving cyclist
Admin
Joined
14 Mar 2002
Messages
21,050
Reaction score
18,903
The Liberal Democratic Party has begun debating a possible new offence of flag desecration, saying it wants to protect Japan's honour and its citizens' feelings. In simple terms, the proposal would make it illegal to damage the Hinomaru national flag. That is the basic idea for now. The details are not settled. Penalties have not been set, nor have the specific acts that would be covered been specified. There is also the question of how such a law would sit with constitutional protections for freedom of expression and thought, and that part remains unclear.

Takahiro Eto, a criminal law professor at Momoyama Gakuin University, suggested it may not be necessary. The LDP, working with its coalition partner Nippon Ishin, aims to pass the measure during the current Diet session. Sanseido submitted a similar bill in October 2025.



 
It's an odd bill to be pushing considering the rarity of flag desecration in Japan, the relatively minor nature of the offence, and Japan and the world's more pressing problems.
 
It's an odd bill to be pushing considering the rarity of flag desecration in Japan, the relatively minor nature of the offence, and Japan and the world's more pressing problems.

Agreed. Japan must also be the only country where political campaign posters aren't desecrated.
 
Agreed. Japan must also be the only country where political campaign posters aren't desecrated.
Mind, I saw the occasional defaced Abe poster while he was PM.
 
Doesn't the Takaichi administration have more urgent issues to address??

Japan's ruling Liberal Democratic Party is moving towards legislation that would punish acts of publicly damaging or defiling the national flag, after an LDP project team broadly approved the outline of a proposed law on 22 May. The discussions centre on acts considered to deliberately damage the flag in ways likely to cause strong public offence. Japanese flags are widely displayed at sporting events and public gatherings, and the party is now debating how such acts should be penalised under criminal law.


Under the current outline, a "national flag" would be defined as a physical object made from cloth or a similar material, intended for actual display, such as one that can be raised, waved, or hung in public.

Because of that definition, small decorative flags used in children's meals would not fall under the proposed legislation. Flags appearing in paintings or artwork would also be excluded. The same would apply to depictions in anime, manga, video games or images generated using artificial intelligence. The legislation would target acts of publicly damaging, soiling or otherwise defiling the Japanese flag in a manner likely to cause significant discomfort, disgust or revulsion among other people.




 
I suppose they want to legislate a warning label because people in a neighboring country occasionally burn it and even eat it, so they don't end up with stomach aches.
 
Great editorial by the Asahi Shimbun:

There is no need for such legislation. We oppose a bill that would only intimidate people and make society more oppressive.

The bill would make it a criminal offence to damage or deface the national flag in a way that could cause strong feelings of discomfort or disgust when witnessed by an unspecified number of people. The measure would also apply to acts involving a person's own national flag, not just to those involving others' flags. Under the proposed legislation, offenders could face up to 2 years in prison or a fine of up to 200,000 yen (about US$1,230). The wording of the bill has drawn attention because it would punish acts deemed offensive if carried out in public or in circumstances where others could observe them.




It's images like the one below that might bring discomfort to some.



 
About 70-80 countries have 'flag anti-desecration laws' but I have to say, they smack, slightly of insecurity. We don't have such laws here in the UK but then I think we're quite secure in our sense of patriotism and have (had) some idea that that sense doesn't revolve around a cloth representation of our nation. If you set a tea pot or bag of fish and chips on fire, there might be a different reaction.

Just be respectful of things that other people hold dear and expensive laws don't have to be debated and set in washi (or parchment as they are over here!).
 
Promoting the very very action you wish to prohibit. Now that's irony for you (and perfectly predictable).
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…