This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

News Former PM Abe assassinated during campaign speech in Nara

I'm very sorry to hear this sad news.

Mr. Shinzo Abe had a good, kind, and humble character like the president of China, Mr. Xi JinPing. He was kind and humble against people.

Sorry for his death
 
Tomihiro Tanaka, the head of Unification Church Japan, confirmed today that the mother of Abe's shooter was a follower but declined to comment on the specifics of her donations, saying a police investigation is underway. He said Yamagami's mother joined the church in the late 1990s and has been participating in church events about once a month lately. He said there were years in between during which she did not come at all.

Source

Neither Abe nor the man arrested for his shooting were members of the church, Tanaka said. Nor was Abe an adviser to the church, Tanaka said, adding that it would cooperate with police on the investigation if asked to do so.



While Abe was neither a follower nor an adviser, he did record a video message of congratulations for another Unification Church event held on 12 September 2021.



More on the relationship between the Kishi/Abe family and the Unification Church:

 
Just a few updates:
  • Last Tuesday, Japan bid farewell to former PM Abe at Tokyo's Zojoji temple. Hundreds of people lined the streets and paid their respects at the temple. The wake was private and attended only by family, friends and several politicians. Following the ceremony, the hearse proceeded through downtown Tokyo, stopping at the Diet and the PM's Office.
  • On Monday, Abe was awarded Japan's highest decoration, the Collar of the Supreme Order of the Chrysanthemum.
  • PM Kishida promised to push Abe's dream of revising the Constitution, but I reckon this is more lip service to the extreme right wing of the LDP. As the FT reports, Abe's death gives the PM a chance to make his mark. In the future, we'll likely see more presence of liberal LDP proponents, such as Kono and Abe's eternal opponent, Ishiba.

More updates to follow.
 
More details emerged on why the Abe shooter held a grudge against the Unification Church: a relative reported that the mother of Yamagami Tetsuya, who shot Mr Abe last Friday, donated 100m JPY (720,000 USD) to the church, including 50m JPY from a life insurance policy taken on her husband, as well as proceeds from property sales. Subsequently, she had to declare bankruptcy in 2002. According to a representative of the Japanese chapter of the Unification Church, some 50m JPY was returned to her between 2005 and 2015.

 
Such mad shootings and assassinations are from insanity, and such insanity is from extremity and persistence in a blind personal belief or revenge.

I believe the shooter's action was because of madness, but it is not an excuse for his horrible assassination.

Now, The murderer is responsible for his felony. Now, the life of the killer is in the hand of Mr.Abe's family. They can appeal the law to execute the murderer (I prefer he to be shot instead of hanging because it is a more comfortable execution and the criminal die immediately) or forgive him.

So, the killer's life or death is depending on the decision of the family of Mr.Abe, not curt itself.

If the murderer is executed, it will be justice, and if he is forgiven (by the victim's family), it is called forgiveness.

Of course, this type of murder is a political and national terror and is more sensitive than a usual assassination.

If the Japanese judiciary system sentences the killer to death, it is better he is shot with the same handmade gun that he shot Mr. Abe to taste the same bearish bullet.
 
Does the family really have that much say in what the prosecution does?
 
Does the family really have that much say in what the prosecution does?

Only in Islamic law: they can forgive the perpetrator or insist on capital punishment.

Back to the original topic:

The government has decided to hold a state funeral for former PM Abe.




A police officer charged with protecting the area behind former PM Abe has told investigators he did not notice the suspected murderer because he was distracted by bicycles on the road.


 
If you're going to blame insanity, you can't assign responsibility to the person you say is mad. Not sure if Japan allows for insanity pleas or how that works. I'm also not sure how much weight is given to the victim's family in sentencing there.

In the American system, it seems likely he'd be found able to stand trial. Although it seems like he was consumed by his anger and desire for revenge, he dedicated a lot of time and effort into his plan, far beyond what could fall under any "temporary insanity" plea. He had the motive, means, and method, and malice of forethought necessary to determine mens rea. You'd be hard pressed to claim temporary insanity when the defendant spent months or perhaps years prototyping their own weapons to carry out the attack.

In Japan, I suspect it's even more cut and dry. He was caught red handed on the scene, and there's no doubt of his guilt, just questions around his motives. Just my hunch, but unless something really surprising comes to light, my guess is he'll get the death penalty, or spend the rest of his life in prison... or both, more or less, as the death penalty is a hanging sentence; the inmate will stay in prison waiting for the day they're told will be their last. So they could serve years or decades before the sentence is carried out.
 
Does the family really have that much say in what the prosecution does?
Yes, in general, the court is not the owner of the killed one's blood, except in the situation the victim has no family. The owner of the person's blood who was killed deliberately is his family.

Even in Involuntary manslaughter, they are the close families of the killed person who should be paid compensation.

The court, prosecutor, and judges only follow the demand of the killed one's family. So, the law is not rightful to do something, unlike the family's appeal.
If the families forgive the killer, the law can not punish the doer and have to release him, and if the families appeal death for the killer, the law can not change the demand.

Of course, about murder, the family can request compensation (instead of executing the murderer). In this condition, if the killer pays that compensation, the law is obligated to release the killer.

But in organized murders like what terrorists do in a country versus the national security, the judge is government, regardless of the appeal of the victims' families.
 
The Unification Church has now come under severe criticism. As I am typing these lines, TBS airs a feature on their aggressive recruitment and donation drives in Japan. Last Tuesday, a group of lawyers accused the cult of extorting donations from its followers.


 
@Mansoor, I'm assuming you're speaking to your own country's laws, but your wording sounds like you're speaking definitively about Japan. Perhaps instead of "In general," you should say "in my country." Their legal systems are not the same.
Good, I abhor cults.
 
A week after Mr Abe's assassination, Dr Hidetada Fukushima, head of Nara Medical University Hospital's emergency medical centre, described his medical team's challenges in attempting to save the former PM's life. Upon hearing the news on TV, Dr Fukushima had summoned a team of 10 doctors before any official request for admission came in.




An interesting piece by Bill Emmott, former editor in chief of The Economist (1993-2006), on why Mr Abe is more highly praised abroad than in Japan. In short, his domestic policies were much less significant, or at least much less noticeable, than his achievements abroad.

Unfortunately, his "Abenomics" stopped short of implementing any significant structural change and never trickled down to the workforce. Abenomics was a huge flop. I hope PM Kishida will succeed more with his "new capitalism".


 
PM Kishida's decision to hold a state funeral for Mr Abe in autumn has triggered mixed reactions. In recent years, expenses for funerals of former prime ministers have usually been split between the Cabinet and the LDP, and even in those cases, there has been criticism of using taxpayer money. For state funerals, the government hosts and shoulders all expenses.

It's reassuring to see critical voices who do not jump on the bandwagon of mystification and glorification.


 
Yesterday, the former Korean chairman of the Unification Church confirmed the close ties between his cult and Mr Abe's grandfather, Kishi Nobusuke, who invited them to establish churches in Japan.



Tetsuya Yamagami, the Abe shooter, seems to cooperate with law enforcement, judging by the number of new details emerging daily. It's amazing what you can learn only from watching Youtube.



And the failure of Abe's security detail becomes more and more evident. Security experts pointed out that five agents rushed to apprehend the shooter but left the former PM to his fate.


 
Japan seems pretty much split up on whether to hold a state funeral for Abe or not. It's interesting to see that it's those over 60 who oppose the idea most.

An opinion poll conducted at the weekend by public broadcaster NHK found 49% of respondents in favor of the idea and 38% against. Those aged 18-39 were most in favor, at 61%, while those in their 60s were most against at 51%.


Statement of former PM Hatoyama:

"People mourned the shocking death of former PM Abe, but that's not the same as a state funeral. The LDP wants to make political use of his death. What do they think about [Toshio] Akagi, whom he forced into death? The LDP needs some humility."

Akagi Toshio was an employee of the Finance Ministry who took his life after claiming he was forced to falsify ministry documents in the Moritomo scandal.

 
Politics is politics, no matter the country. I don't see him needing a state funeral myself. He wasn't assassinated while "in office". They could always just hold a "public" funeral for him.
 
PM Kishida is paying a high price for his premature reaction to holding a state funeral: his cabinet's approval rating plummeted to 51%.


 
An NPA investigation into the circumstances surrounding the fatal shooting of Abe on 8 July found that last-minute changes in a police officer's location and the man's failure to notify a superior the spot was now unguarded are believed to be the main factors that left former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe vulnerable to an attack from his back.


 
Mansoor - As you say, you have no evidence to offer your theory. In that case, you shouldn't post your theory. And a cursory read of Japanese history will tell you that it's been anything but peaceful. I'm sorry to be blunt, but you are showing your ignorance of Japan in your recent posts.
 
Although most Japanese disagree, the Cabinet today approved 250 million JPY (taken from taxpayers' pockets) to hold a state funeral for former PM Abe. The allocated budget does not include security expenses around the venue, so the actual cost will likely double.


There are several petitions on Change.org to have Abe's state funeral cancelled. I have signed two of them.







Yesterday, the head of the National Police Agency, Nakamura Itaru, resigned to take responsibility for security lapses leading up to the shooting.

 
Although most Japanese disagree, the Cabinet today approved 250 million JPY (taken from taxpayers' pockets) to hold a state funeral for former PM Abe.
Gee, its almost like the government doesn't represent the people....
 
The Japanese police face the dilemma of closing a legal loophole to add an additional charge of illegal weapon use on Tatsuo Yamagami, who shot former PM Abe with a handmade gun last July.




 
That damn paramilitary person shaped the gun similar to a photographer camera to seem like a camera from distance. This could give him an opportunity in a short time to take the gun out from his bag and shoot, before police, Abe's guard or the citizens realize he was aiming Abe with a gun and was not taking photo!

How devilish plan!
 
Nara City has begun dismantling the guardrail where former PM Abe was shot last July.




I am glad that the City of Nara prioritised traffic safety over creating a place of worship and martyrdom.
 


I don't see what removing that will do for anyone honestly. There is not a road on the other side, so the only options are a right or left turn anyway. Unless they are also changing the other side. That crosswalk is a bit scary though, people whip into and out of it and I always have crossed further down the road where there is more visibility to drivers and people in the crosswalk.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…