Your interpretation is not correct. What is the subject of the Japanese sentence?The former I think it means one person is infected with virus
Strictly speaking, ウイルスにうつる/うつらない is ungrammatical. うつる is used as 感染する there.ウイルスにうつらない
ウイルス is the subject in 1人にウイルスがうつる. I'm not quite sure what に does here.Your interpretation is not correct. What is the subject of the Japanese sentence?
I excerpted the text from Easier Japanese Practice. If not grammatical, how could one reword it in the simplest way? I don't understand why it is ungrammatical? Could it then simply be 外でウイルスに感染しないようによく気をつけてくださいと言いました? Is 感染する a transitive verb or an intransitive verb?Strictly speaking, ウイルスにうつる/うつらない is ungrammatical. うつる is used as 感染する there.
Right.ウイルス is the subject in 1人にウイルスがうつる.
Unlike the original Japanese sentence, the subject is "one person" in your English translation "one person is infected with virus". That's my point. The original sentence structure is "the virus infects one person."I had supposed that 1人にウイルスがうつると、ほかの家族にうつさないようにするのはとても難しいです means "If/When one person is infected, then it is very difficult to prevent other members of the family to get infected".
に can be considered to indicate the destination, similar to 電車が駅に着く, since うつる is the same verb as 移る "to move to~". It's also possible to interpret as the target marker, similar to 犬が人に吠える, though.I'm not quite sure what に does here.
うつ・る【移る/遷る】 の解説I don't understand why it is ungrammatical?
Yes.Could it then simply be 外でウイルスに感染しないようによく気をつけてくださいと言いました?
The latter.Is 感染する a transitive verb or an intransitive verb?
Are you suggesting that a well-known Japanese native said it wrong grammatically and other people simply follow suit?Google search results suggest that ウイルスにうつらない is originally from the Governor of Tokyo Metropolis Koike Yuriko's words.
I have found the dictionaries I have used never state whether a する-verb transitive or intransitive while they often specify clearly with most of other verbs. I wonder why. How can we tell whether a する-verb is transitive or intransitive? Can they be either depending on the context?The latter.
It's ungrammatical but understandable, as I wrote.Are you suggesting that a well-known Japanese native said it wrong grammatically and other people simply follow suit?
I was expecting the website would use correct Japanese language.
Generally speaking, volitional verbs are transitive, and non-volitional ones are intransitive. You can check it in example sentences in dictionaries or google search results, if you really want to know it.I have found the dictionaries I have used never state whether a する-verb transitive or intransitive while they often specify clearly with most of other verbs. I wonder why. How can we tell whether a する-verb is transitive or intransitive?
No.Can they be either depending on the context?
Thanks! I forgot my original question.It's ungrammatical but understandable, as I wrote.
It's ungrammtical which means it's not correct. So I don't think it does anything. Probably the に should be が. Maybe the obvious part is unstated such as ウイルス(が人)にうつらないように which is why it's understandable. A native speaker would fill such omitted details automatically.Whether it is ウイルスにうつらないように or ウイルスに感染しないように, could you please tell me what the に does or mean here? Thanks!