- 14 Mar 2002
- 14,993
- 7,939
- 749
Read Debito's report on how to run for office in Japan. His wife, Ayako Sugawara, is one of the candidates for the town council office in their hometown Nanporo (second post).
An interesting insight into Japan's communal politics.
- Posted on behalf of Debito -
REPORT: POLITICS IN JAPANON RUNNING FOR OFFICE, PART ONE
By Arudou Debito, April 23, 2003
(freely forwardable)
Long-time readers of my essays might remember one I wrote in 1999, about an
election deciding the fate of my hometown, Nanporo, Hokkaido .
(Arudou Debito/Dave Aldwinckle's Page for Social Issues in Japan) The main issue
was whether the 24-year incumbent mayor would lead the town irretrievably
into debt by building a ludicrous second Dai-San Sector golf course
(www.debito.org: Case Study of Japan's Dai-san Sector as engine of corruption), or if the former vice-mayor would steer
things into a different (and hopefully fiscally-prudent) direction. After
my friends and I organized a landmark public forum that ultimately exposed
the mayor as corrupt, our side won the election and the golf course was
halted. It was a pretty amazing show of "people power", even in Japan.
Now it's election time again. Little did I know that this time one of the
candidates for the Town Council (Chougikai) would be my wife. I am learning
firsthand the nuts and bolts of electioneering, and how Japanese election
laws, in the name of fairness, actually end up hindering "people power"--by
keeping candidates safe from closer public scrutiny.
//////////////////////////////////////////////
NANPORO ELECTIONS 2003 PART ONE
C'MON CANDIDATES, WHAT DO YOU REALLY THINK?
SORRY, DEMANDING THAT GOES AGAINST JAPANESE ELECTION LAWS.
About three weeks ago, one of my townie friends, Mr Suzuki, contacted me
over a matter of some import. We had had close ties over the past four
years, organizing Nanporo "Town Meetings" (see above elections link), albeit
with decreasing frequency given my busyness with the Otaru Onsen lawsuit
(www.debito.org: THE OTARU LAWSUIT INFORMATION SITE, by the Plaintiffs) and publishing a book on it.
(www.debito.org: Debito Arudou/Dave Aldwinckle's Publications). Mr Suzuki, who suddenly decided
to run for mayor, suggested we also get somebody from our part of Nanporo,
Minami Machi, to run for a council seat. The time was nigh to steer the
town in a different direction again.
Background on the electorate: Nanporo, population around 9500 souls, was
once Hokkaido 's fastest-growing town. The former mayor, on a ruse to
increase the town tax base, lured urban families here with cheap government
loans for big houses on large parcels of land. Ten years of this produced a
new electorate, split between new bed-towners (40%), farmers (30%), and
generational geriatric businessmen (40%). Nanporo's town council
representation, however, remained static. Out of 16 seats, only one has up
to now been a bed-towner--the rest being farmers (supplementing their
decreasing income with a 3,000,000 yen annual councillor salary) and local
businessmen (ditto). Nobody seemed concerned that they had brought us all
here, saddled us with some of the highest public service fees in Japan, yet
reneged on promises to provide better secondary education (Nanporo's senior
high school is one of the worst in Hokkaido ; most bed-towners export their
teenage kids) and a proper supermarket (even though fertile Nanporo
specializes in cabbage, onions, and rice, Japan's byzantine distribution
system means our local Noukyou shopping shack has few fresh veggies, let
alone meat and fish; and with no nearby competition, they even charge
extortionate prices). Result: apathy amidst the bed-towners, not to
mention a high divorce and house-turnover rate. Nanporo's population has
been slowly dropping due to an aging population and few new entrants (nobody
thinks the government house loan agency is solvent without Nanporo town
subsidies). The new mayor, although not a bad person, has turned out to be
a bureaucrat with few novel or creative solutions. So this time the
bed-towners decided to become candidates--six out of eighteen, running for
fourteen seats this time. My wife, Sugawara Ayako, is one of them.
One question that may occur to the reader is: Why didn't I run? I am a
Japanese citizen, after all. Simple answer: I decided against it because I
already have enough to do, and can't read Japanese fast enough yet to be an
effective public servant. Anyway, Ayako herself is plenty noteworthy. At
44, she is by far the youngest candidate (the other seventeen are all well
into their second half-century), and one of only two women. She is also the
only one clearly campaigning under issues of education, consumer choice, and
increased overseas ties (she has even suggested a sister-city relationship
with my hometown in Central New York, for educational exchanges). She is
antipathetic to the perfunctory rural "bread-and-circuses" slogans (elderly
care, preferential treatment for farming, and having the town stand alone
financially in an era where indebted Japanese ghost towns are
conglomerating). In fact, as far as we can see from all of the campaign
pamphlets we received from rivals in the mail, only Ayako (who advertises
herself as Nanporo's Joan of Arc. Seriously) has any substance to her
public promises. (Most just have mug shots of candidates clenching fists
and promising to fight for a brighter tomorrow; one guy even got all chummy,
saying his favorite food was ramen, his favorite word "yume" (dream). Ayuh,
my kinda guy.)
Since the original bed-towner councillor is retiring his seat, we thought
Ayako has a pretty good chance of getting in--by appealing to the housewife
vote (especially since the other woman is a member of the Japanese Communist
Party, and a well-known do-nothing incumbent). There is also, for better or
worse, the fact that she is known for being married to me, a kinda
well-known do-everything. So she threw her hat into the ring.
//////////////////////////////////////////////
TRYING TO RAISE SOME ISSUES, ANY ISSUES
I decided to stay as much in the background as possible during her campaign.
If she was to be elected, I wanted it to be on her strengths, her merits,
and her proposals, so that with the force of her convictions and a popular
mandate she could be an effective councillor without any crutches. My job
instead was to create a venue where the electorate could see that somebody
out there has a real agenda for real problems. Not just homilies about
ramen dreams. So like the one which contributed to the mayoral upset four
years ago, I organized a forum where all the candidates could get together,
parade a platform, and be asked questions from the floor.
I drew up pretty much the same forum proposal I did in 1999--invite all
candidates, have them give a five-minute policy statement, then allow
questions from the audience by paper or microphone. All told, it would be
two hours of good, honest communication between elector and elected. Fora
at the local level are highly unusual in Japan, since regular campaigning as
I said avoids substance: i.e. going around in sound trucks screaming
"yoroshiku" (please treat me favorably) and "ganbarimasu" (I'll do my best)
all day, making platitudinous speeches outside a few public areas, getting
permission to walk into companies and shake hands with everyone (apathetics
are suckers for these two-handed cupped-handshakes, especially when people
have nothing else to go on except "kizuna" (interpersonal connection)), and
rely on their party machines to contact people and secure vocal promises of
five to ten votes each (one of my eccentric uncles called my wife four years
ago to get me to vote LDP, even though I didn't have Japanese citizenship
yet). I thought that one of the larger successes of American democracy (New
England Town Meetings) might help shake voters out of their apathy.
Unfortunately, I didn't reckon on the interventions of Nanporo's Electoral
Steering Committee (Nanporo-chou Senkyo Kanri Iinkai, "Senkan" for short)
and its arcane rules.
The first thing the town bureaucrats at the Senkan said was, "Why are you
trying to hold this forum on the day before the election, on Saturday, April
26?"
Me: "Because by then five days will have elapsed since the 'offical
campaign period' started." (Yes, it's that short.) "We will have at least
had a chance to hear what candidates have said so far and be able to ask
more informed questions."
Senkan: "Why not do it before the election period? You did so four years
ago."
Me: "Because I learned my lesson. Four years ago, candidates were able to
weasel out of it. Since they were not yet 'officially confirmed'
candidates, they technically could not talk about their policies outside of
the 'official campaign period' (senkyo kikan). Thus attending this forum
would allegedly void their candidacy. I want to plug those loopholes this
time around."
Senkan: "But you cannot sponsor the forum."
Me: "Why not? As Chair of our organization, the 'Chihou Bunken Forum', I
did so four years ago."
Senkan: "Yes, but your wife is running for office this time. Nobody,
especially not us at the Senkan, will believe that this forum is impartial."
Me: "I am not participating in her campaign."
Senkan: "Doesn't matter. 'Shakai tsuunen' (social convention) dictates
that you will be biased. And don't ask your Vice-Chair, Mr Suzuki, to chair
the forum either. He's running for mayor. Find a neutral person."
I did. The abdicating bed-town councillor. Senkan: "We'll accept him
because he's a private citizen again. But you should consider moving the
date to before the election period."
Me: "Why?"
Senkan: "Because under Electoral Law 164, Clause 3," he thumbed through a
six-centimeter-thick book, "only political parties and Individual Candidate
Support Groups can sponsor fora then." (okonau kojin enzetsukai, seitou
enzetsukai oyobi seitou tou enzetsuzai o nozoku hoka, ikanaru meigi o
motsute suru o towazu, kaisai suru koto ga dekinai)
Me: "You mean private citizens can't?"
Senkan: "No, they can't."
Me: "So how can we ask our candidates any questions?"
Senkan: "You can go to each one of their support group meetings."
Me: "What, all eighteen of them, plus two mayoral candidates? You just try
to raise a question as they preach to the converted. And then you can't get
them to debate with each other because they'll never be in the same room.
That's unwieldy."
Senkan: "You could get them to do a co-sponsored support group (kyoudou
enzetsukai). That would be legal."
Me: "And equally unwieldy. The Communist Party agreeing to sponsor with
Koumeitou? As if."
Senkan: "Well, if the candidates themselves would try to organize a forum..."
Me: "That's a ramen dream. They aren't about to submit themselves to
increased scrutiny, or participate in a debate they might lose in public if
they don't have to. I'm sure they'd rather stick to sound-truck
platitudes."
Senkan: "So why don't you invite the non-party candidates? There are still
fifteen councillors and both mayoral candidates left over."
Me: "Okay, I'll do that. But I still want to hold it on the eve of the
election."
Senkan: "Fine. But under electoral laws, during this time period you
cannot use regular networks, such as newspaper fold-ins
(orikomi--advertisements tucked in as separate pieces of paper) or
public-sector channels, for political purposes. Only the post office, at
your own expense." Which would be, after printing up all the flyers and
addressing all the envelopes, about 80 yen times 3500 households...
Me: "Okay, I give up. I'll arrange the forum for the weekend before the
election period starts. April 20th okay? Then I can advertise through the
newspaper fold-ins, right?" Right.
So I got to work. I faxed every single candidate, telling them the contents
and goals of the forum. It was to be completely neutral, with equal time
for stumping, a neutral emcee, with audience questions on issues to be
directed at all attendees. Our local Senkan even got the approval from
Hokkaido Senkan Headquarters. Things looked set to go.
However, this time, our local Hokkaido newspaper distributor decided to blow
a whistle.
Distributor: "You want this forum announcement to be a newspaper fold-in?
No can do."
Me: "And why not?"
Distributor: "Because newspaper regulations dictate that fold-ins cannot be
used for 'political and religious affairs, or social issues'" I asked for
written proof of this, which he produced. "You want to use this network,
the forum has to be cleared by the Senkan."
Me: "It has been."
Distributor: "Then I want it cleared with Hokkaido Shinbun's Sales
Department HQ. My company has to take the heat for any complaints that come
from the public, and I want to be sure..."
Me: "Look, I think you're being overly anal. Not one week ago, when I
tried to advertise my book 'JAPANESE ONLY--The Otaru Bathhouse Refusals and
Racial Discrimination' as a Nanporo fold-in, you tried to refuse it because
you took it upon yourself to editorialize, deeming the book's very title 'a
social issue'. One call on my part to your precious Hokkaido Shinbun Sales
Department HQ revealed that my book announcement was to be treated as a mere
advertisement of a product, not a call to action or a rally to a political
cause. Now kindly remember who the customer is here and take my goddamn
fold-in money."
Distributor: "But on the announcement, you've listed the names of the
candidates who have agreed to attend. Are you sure the Senkan cleared
that?"
Oh for crying out loud, what could possibly be wrong with listing attendees?
Senkan: "Under electoral laws, you are not allowed to bias the public
against any candidate. What would the public think if only some people were
listed as attendees? Would they not think badly of those who decided not to
attend?"
Me: "Look, do you guys spend late nights dreaming up ways to interfere with
freedom of speech and normal democratic processes? If the candidates decide
not to attend, that should be said candidate's responsibility, not ours.
They refuse on their own recognizance. If they haven't the guts to attend,
that should be known about."
Senkan: "But that could inadvertantly create a bias."
Me: "So could a gaffe from one of them during a debate. But are we to
suspend all debate because debators might make people think ill of them, due
to their own choices?"
My Senkan man finally laughed. "C'mon, make it easy on yourself. Just
don't put any names on the forum flyer."
Me: "I think people have the right to know who will be attending. Nobody
will attend if they don't think any candidates will show. Get real."
Senkan: "Okay, I'll pass this by the Senkan HQ again..."
Me: "Sorry, there's no time for that. Thanks to the shift in the date,
there are only three days until the forum. I have to get this to the
newspaper now for the forum announcement to appear the day before. Up to
now I think I've been thoroughly cooperative with you. Now tell me what
happens if I run this announcement as is."
Senkan: "Well, that means the forum goes on without Senkan approval."
Me: "Oh. Will I be arrested?"
Senkan: "Er, no. Just frowned at. If you run a biased forum on the day,
however, we may have to disqualify the candidates."
Me: "But as things stand now, nobody can be disqualified or arrested,
pending the neutral outcome of the forum. Right?"
Senkan: "That's right. I will be attending and watching."
And that's how a week of negotiations wrought a forum. We had a full house
(85 attendees, mostly elderly farmers), and four councillor candidates (no
incumbents, all bed-towners trying to get some exposure) including my wife
having their say. Good news was that both mayoral candidates (the incumbent
mayor, seeing the names of attendees, changed his mind and showed up) were
there, and both gave good accounts of themselves with practical ideas.
Everyone I talked to was happy the forum happened; even my Senkan man deemed
it suitably neutral. It was another precedent set, for the next turn of the
electoral cycle.
//////////////////////////////////////////////
CONCLUSIONS
But the point about Japan's odd democratic processes still stands. As in
all election systems, candidates need only care about securing a sufficient
number of votes from their loyalists. Which means that unless called upon
to comment on larger issues, all they have to do is play it safe. Problem
is that Japan's electoral rules effectively silence the issue-raisers--by
discouraging the public from treating them like candidates before the
"official election period", or by making it near impossible to get them
debating or answering questions in public during it. Without the ability to
create independent public fora, communication winds up being all top-down
and heavily-controlled.
The negative consequences of this short-circuited democracy are not too
difficult to find. Aside from voter apathy through a sense of futility,
abuses occur, even in a place as small Nanporo. For example, the largest
vote-getter last election, the Koumeitou rep (who literally has a religious
following, thanks to the sponsoring Souka Gakkai demanding blind
favoritism), seems oblivious to our educational problems. Instead of trying
to improve the high school, it turns out last month during town council
proceedings he tried to get some teachers fired from the local
(high-quality) grade school--simply because they would not stand when the
controversial Japanese national anthem was played. Misguided ideology like
that should be more known about: Should you vote for such a nitwit? It
would have been nice if that matter of public record could have been raised
in the media. Or a public forum, ahem.
But then again, I guess that's a bias. Under Japanese electoral law, any
potential opinion at all qualifies as a bias. So try to remain apathetic
when organizing people power in Japan.
An interesting insight into Japan's communal politics.
- Posted on behalf of Debito -
REPORT: POLITICS IN JAPANON RUNNING FOR OFFICE, PART ONE
By Arudou Debito, April 23, 2003
(freely forwardable)
Long-time readers of my essays might remember one I wrote in 1999, about an
election deciding the fate of my hometown, Nanporo, Hokkaido .
(Arudou Debito/Dave Aldwinckle's Page for Social Issues in Japan) The main issue
was whether the 24-year incumbent mayor would lead the town irretrievably
into debt by building a ludicrous second Dai-San Sector golf course
(www.debito.org: Case Study of Japan's Dai-san Sector as engine of corruption), or if the former vice-mayor would steer
things into a different (and hopefully fiscally-prudent) direction. After
my friends and I organized a landmark public forum that ultimately exposed
the mayor as corrupt, our side won the election and the golf course was
halted. It was a pretty amazing show of "people power", even in Japan.
Now it's election time again. Little did I know that this time one of the
candidates for the Town Council (Chougikai) would be my wife. I am learning
firsthand the nuts and bolts of electioneering, and how Japanese election
laws, in the name of fairness, actually end up hindering "people power"--by
keeping candidates safe from closer public scrutiny.
//////////////////////////////////////////////
NANPORO ELECTIONS 2003 PART ONE
C'MON CANDIDATES, WHAT DO YOU REALLY THINK?
SORRY, DEMANDING THAT GOES AGAINST JAPANESE ELECTION LAWS.
About three weeks ago, one of my townie friends, Mr Suzuki, contacted me
over a matter of some import. We had had close ties over the past four
years, organizing Nanporo "Town Meetings" (see above elections link), albeit
with decreasing frequency given my busyness with the Otaru Onsen lawsuit
(www.debito.org: THE OTARU LAWSUIT INFORMATION SITE, by the Plaintiffs) and publishing a book on it.
(www.debito.org: Debito Arudou/Dave Aldwinckle's Publications). Mr Suzuki, who suddenly decided
to run for mayor, suggested we also get somebody from our part of Nanporo,
Minami Machi, to run for a council seat. The time was nigh to steer the
town in a different direction again.
Background on the electorate: Nanporo, population around 9500 souls, was
once Hokkaido 's fastest-growing town. The former mayor, on a ruse to
increase the town tax base, lured urban families here with cheap government
loans for big houses on large parcels of land. Ten years of this produced a
new electorate, split between new bed-towners (40%), farmers (30%), and
generational geriatric businessmen (40%). Nanporo's town council
representation, however, remained static. Out of 16 seats, only one has up
to now been a bed-towner--the rest being farmers (supplementing their
decreasing income with a 3,000,000 yen annual councillor salary) and local
businessmen (ditto). Nobody seemed concerned that they had brought us all
here, saddled us with some of the highest public service fees in Japan, yet
reneged on promises to provide better secondary education (Nanporo's senior
high school is one of the worst in Hokkaido ; most bed-towners export their
teenage kids) and a proper supermarket (even though fertile Nanporo
specializes in cabbage, onions, and rice, Japan's byzantine distribution
system means our local Noukyou shopping shack has few fresh veggies, let
alone meat and fish; and with no nearby competition, they even charge
extortionate prices). Result: apathy amidst the bed-towners, not to
mention a high divorce and house-turnover rate. Nanporo's population has
been slowly dropping due to an aging population and few new entrants (nobody
thinks the government house loan agency is solvent without Nanporo town
subsidies). The new mayor, although not a bad person, has turned out to be
a bureaucrat with few novel or creative solutions. So this time the
bed-towners decided to become candidates--six out of eighteen, running for
fourteen seats this time. My wife, Sugawara Ayako, is one of them.
One question that may occur to the reader is: Why didn't I run? I am a
Japanese citizen, after all. Simple answer: I decided against it because I
already have enough to do, and can't read Japanese fast enough yet to be an
effective public servant. Anyway, Ayako herself is plenty noteworthy. At
44, she is by far the youngest candidate (the other seventeen are all well
into their second half-century), and one of only two women. She is also the
only one clearly campaigning under issues of education, consumer choice, and
increased overseas ties (she has even suggested a sister-city relationship
with my hometown in Central New York, for educational exchanges). She is
antipathetic to the perfunctory rural "bread-and-circuses" slogans (elderly
care, preferential treatment for farming, and having the town stand alone
financially in an era where indebted Japanese ghost towns are
conglomerating). In fact, as far as we can see from all of the campaign
pamphlets we received from rivals in the mail, only Ayako (who advertises
herself as Nanporo's Joan of Arc. Seriously) has any substance to her
public promises. (Most just have mug shots of candidates clenching fists
and promising to fight for a brighter tomorrow; one guy even got all chummy,
saying his favorite food was ramen, his favorite word "yume" (dream). Ayuh,
my kinda guy.)
Since the original bed-towner councillor is retiring his seat, we thought
Ayako has a pretty good chance of getting in--by appealing to the housewife
vote (especially since the other woman is a member of the Japanese Communist
Party, and a well-known do-nothing incumbent). There is also, for better or
worse, the fact that she is known for being married to me, a kinda
well-known do-everything. So she threw her hat into the ring.
//////////////////////////////////////////////
TRYING TO RAISE SOME ISSUES, ANY ISSUES
I decided to stay as much in the background as possible during her campaign.
If she was to be elected, I wanted it to be on her strengths, her merits,
and her proposals, so that with the force of her convictions and a popular
mandate she could be an effective councillor without any crutches. My job
instead was to create a venue where the electorate could see that somebody
out there has a real agenda for real problems. Not just homilies about
ramen dreams. So like the one which contributed to the mayoral upset four
years ago, I organized a forum where all the candidates could get together,
parade a platform, and be asked questions from the floor.
I drew up pretty much the same forum proposal I did in 1999--invite all
candidates, have them give a five-minute policy statement, then allow
questions from the audience by paper or microphone. All told, it would be
two hours of good, honest communication between elector and elected. Fora
at the local level are highly unusual in Japan, since regular campaigning as
I said avoids substance: i.e. going around in sound trucks screaming
"yoroshiku" (please treat me favorably) and "ganbarimasu" (I'll do my best)
all day, making platitudinous speeches outside a few public areas, getting
permission to walk into companies and shake hands with everyone (apathetics
are suckers for these two-handed cupped-handshakes, especially when people
have nothing else to go on except "kizuna" (interpersonal connection)), and
rely on their party machines to contact people and secure vocal promises of
five to ten votes each (one of my eccentric uncles called my wife four years
ago to get me to vote LDP, even though I didn't have Japanese citizenship
yet). I thought that one of the larger successes of American democracy (New
England Town Meetings) might help shake voters out of their apathy.
Unfortunately, I didn't reckon on the interventions of Nanporo's Electoral
Steering Committee (Nanporo-chou Senkyo Kanri Iinkai, "Senkan" for short)
and its arcane rules.
The first thing the town bureaucrats at the Senkan said was, "Why are you
trying to hold this forum on the day before the election, on Saturday, April
26?"
Me: "Because by then five days will have elapsed since the 'offical
campaign period' started." (Yes, it's that short.) "We will have at least
had a chance to hear what candidates have said so far and be able to ask
more informed questions."
Senkan: "Why not do it before the election period? You did so four years
ago."
Me: "Because I learned my lesson. Four years ago, candidates were able to
weasel out of it. Since they were not yet 'officially confirmed'
candidates, they technically could not talk about their policies outside of
the 'official campaign period' (senkyo kikan). Thus attending this forum
would allegedly void their candidacy. I want to plug those loopholes this
time around."
Senkan: "But you cannot sponsor the forum."
Me: "Why not? As Chair of our organization, the 'Chihou Bunken Forum', I
did so four years ago."
Senkan: "Yes, but your wife is running for office this time. Nobody,
especially not us at the Senkan, will believe that this forum is impartial."
Me: "I am not participating in her campaign."
Senkan: "Doesn't matter. 'Shakai tsuunen' (social convention) dictates
that you will be biased. And don't ask your Vice-Chair, Mr Suzuki, to chair
the forum either. He's running for mayor. Find a neutral person."
I did. The abdicating bed-town councillor. Senkan: "We'll accept him
because he's a private citizen again. But you should consider moving the
date to before the election period."
Me: "Why?"
Senkan: "Because under Electoral Law 164, Clause 3," he thumbed through a
six-centimeter-thick book, "only political parties and Individual Candidate
Support Groups can sponsor fora then." (okonau kojin enzetsukai, seitou
enzetsukai oyobi seitou tou enzetsuzai o nozoku hoka, ikanaru meigi o
motsute suru o towazu, kaisai suru koto ga dekinai)
Me: "You mean private citizens can't?"
Senkan: "No, they can't."
Me: "So how can we ask our candidates any questions?"
Senkan: "You can go to each one of their support group meetings."
Me: "What, all eighteen of them, plus two mayoral candidates? You just try
to raise a question as they preach to the converted. And then you can't get
them to debate with each other because they'll never be in the same room.
That's unwieldy."
Senkan: "You could get them to do a co-sponsored support group (kyoudou
enzetsukai). That would be legal."
Me: "And equally unwieldy. The Communist Party agreeing to sponsor with
Koumeitou? As if."
Senkan: "Well, if the candidates themselves would try to organize a forum..."
Me: "That's a ramen dream. They aren't about to submit themselves to
increased scrutiny, or participate in a debate they might lose in public if
they don't have to. I'm sure they'd rather stick to sound-truck
platitudes."
Senkan: "So why don't you invite the non-party candidates? There are still
fifteen councillors and both mayoral candidates left over."
Me: "Okay, I'll do that. But I still want to hold it on the eve of the
election."
Senkan: "Fine. But under electoral laws, during this time period you
cannot use regular networks, such as newspaper fold-ins
(orikomi--advertisements tucked in as separate pieces of paper) or
public-sector channels, for political purposes. Only the post office, at
your own expense." Which would be, after printing up all the flyers and
addressing all the envelopes, about 80 yen times 3500 households...
Me: "Okay, I give up. I'll arrange the forum for the weekend before the
election period starts. April 20th okay? Then I can advertise through the
newspaper fold-ins, right?" Right.
So I got to work. I faxed every single candidate, telling them the contents
and goals of the forum. It was to be completely neutral, with equal time
for stumping, a neutral emcee, with audience questions on issues to be
directed at all attendees. Our local Senkan even got the approval from
Hokkaido Senkan Headquarters. Things looked set to go.
However, this time, our local Hokkaido newspaper distributor decided to blow
a whistle.
Distributor: "You want this forum announcement to be a newspaper fold-in?
No can do."
Me: "And why not?"
Distributor: "Because newspaper regulations dictate that fold-ins cannot be
used for 'political and religious affairs, or social issues'" I asked for
written proof of this, which he produced. "You want to use this network,
the forum has to be cleared by the Senkan."
Me: "It has been."
Distributor: "Then I want it cleared with Hokkaido Shinbun's Sales
Department HQ. My company has to take the heat for any complaints that come
from the public, and I want to be sure..."
Me: "Look, I think you're being overly anal. Not one week ago, when I
tried to advertise my book 'JAPANESE ONLY--The Otaru Bathhouse Refusals and
Racial Discrimination' as a Nanporo fold-in, you tried to refuse it because
you took it upon yourself to editorialize, deeming the book's very title 'a
social issue'. One call on my part to your precious Hokkaido Shinbun Sales
Department HQ revealed that my book announcement was to be treated as a mere
advertisement of a product, not a call to action or a rally to a political
cause. Now kindly remember who the customer is here and take my goddamn
fold-in money."
Distributor: "But on the announcement, you've listed the names of the
candidates who have agreed to attend. Are you sure the Senkan cleared
that?"
Oh for crying out loud, what could possibly be wrong with listing attendees?
Senkan: "Under electoral laws, you are not allowed to bias the public
against any candidate. What would the public think if only some people were
listed as attendees? Would they not think badly of those who decided not to
attend?"
Me: "Look, do you guys spend late nights dreaming up ways to interfere with
freedom of speech and normal democratic processes? If the candidates decide
not to attend, that should be said candidate's responsibility, not ours.
They refuse on their own recognizance. If they haven't the guts to attend,
that should be known about."
Senkan: "But that could inadvertantly create a bias."
Me: "So could a gaffe from one of them during a debate. But are we to
suspend all debate because debators might make people think ill of them, due
to their own choices?"
My Senkan man finally laughed. "C'mon, make it easy on yourself. Just
don't put any names on the forum flyer."
Me: "I think people have the right to know who will be attending. Nobody
will attend if they don't think any candidates will show. Get real."
Senkan: "Okay, I'll pass this by the Senkan HQ again..."
Me: "Sorry, there's no time for that. Thanks to the shift in the date,
there are only three days until the forum. I have to get this to the
newspaper now for the forum announcement to appear the day before. Up to
now I think I've been thoroughly cooperative with you. Now tell me what
happens if I run this announcement as is."
Senkan: "Well, that means the forum goes on without Senkan approval."
Me: "Oh. Will I be arrested?"
Senkan: "Er, no. Just frowned at. If you run a biased forum on the day,
however, we may have to disqualify the candidates."
Me: "But as things stand now, nobody can be disqualified or arrested,
pending the neutral outcome of the forum. Right?"
Senkan: "That's right. I will be attending and watching."
And that's how a week of negotiations wrought a forum. We had a full house
(85 attendees, mostly elderly farmers), and four councillor candidates (no
incumbents, all bed-towners trying to get some exposure) including my wife
having their say. Good news was that both mayoral candidates (the incumbent
mayor, seeing the names of attendees, changed his mind and showed up) were
there, and both gave good accounts of themselves with practical ideas.
Everyone I talked to was happy the forum happened; even my Senkan man deemed
it suitably neutral. It was another precedent set, for the next turn of the
electoral cycle.
//////////////////////////////////////////////
CONCLUSIONS
But the point about Japan's odd democratic processes still stands. As in
all election systems, candidates need only care about securing a sufficient
number of votes from their loyalists. Which means that unless called upon
to comment on larger issues, all they have to do is play it safe. Problem
is that Japan's electoral rules effectively silence the issue-raisers--by
discouraging the public from treating them like candidates before the
"official election period", or by making it near impossible to get them
debating or answering questions in public during it. Without the ability to
create independent public fora, communication winds up being all top-down
and heavily-controlled.
The negative consequences of this short-circuited democracy are not too
difficult to find. Aside from voter apathy through a sense of futility,
abuses occur, even in a place as small Nanporo. For example, the largest
vote-getter last election, the Koumeitou rep (who literally has a religious
following, thanks to the sponsoring Souka Gakkai demanding blind
favoritism), seems oblivious to our educational problems. Instead of trying
to improve the high school, it turns out last month during town council
proceedings he tried to get some teachers fired from the local
(high-quality) grade school--simply because they would not stand when the
controversial Japanese national anthem was played. Misguided ideology like
that should be more known about: Should you vote for such a nitwit? It
would have been nice if that matter of public record could have been raised
in the media. Or a public forum, ahem.
But then again, I guess that's a bias. Under Japanese electoral law, any
potential opinion at all qualifies as a bias. So try to remain apathetic
when organizing people power in Japan.