Manny_
後輩
- 6 Oct 2002
- 16
- 0
- 11
Knowing that you can't trust what you read online, I've really heard a lot about ninja, ninjutsu, and the ninja's female equivalent, kunoichi.
Now I must ask, how much of it is real? Depsite the veil of secrecy behind the whole concept of ninja, I would find hard pressed to believe that, as some people claim, that ninja did not exist. While it would be plausible to accept that much of what we Westerners may have heard about ninja is probably just legend, the stealthy spy/assasin must have had a role in midieval Japan.
But what is real about the ninja? What is not? Were there really women ninja, kunoichi? Did the ninja really utilize the array of weapons and tools like the caltrops, throwing stars, manriki gusami, the hollow blade staff, sais, grappling hooks, egg shell bombs, etc...?
Is the ninja-to, the straight blade, square tsuba sword of the ninja really exist in pre-modern times? Some sources I have seen said yes, some have said no. I'm really inclined to believe the latter due to the rituality of the sword making art is to the Japanese.
-Manny
Now I must ask, how much of it is real? Depsite the veil of secrecy behind the whole concept of ninja, I would find hard pressed to believe that, as some people claim, that ninja did not exist. While it would be plausible to accept that much of what we Westerners may have heard about ninja is probably just legend, the stealthy spy/assasin must have had a role in midieval Japan.
But what is real about the ninja? What is not? Were there really women ninja, kunoichi? Did the ninja really utilize the array of weapons and tools like the caltrops, throwing stars, manriki gusami, the hollow blade staff, sais, grappling hooks, egg shell bombs, etc...?
Is the ninja-to, the straight blade, square tsuba sword of the ninja really exist in pre-modern times? Some sources I have seen said yes, some have said no. I'm really inclined to believe the latter due to the rituality of the sword making art is to the Japanese.
-Manny