#### Chan Rasjid

##### Registered

- 23 Jun 2016

- 4

- 0

- 11

First, a little clarification why I post here and not in those active physics forums in the internet. In nearly all physics forums in the western world, any post that questions the validity of physics related to Einstein's relativity would be deleted automatically. I have not many venue to discuss my recent discovery.

Most people would not believe that the famous equation, E= mc², from Einstein could be wrong. First a little clarification. The formula has two part. The so call mass-energy equivalence - mass may be converted to energy - is not wrong; it is the basis why we have nuclear power. What my discovery shows to be wrong is the the so called relativistic kinetic energy part of E=mc² wrong - relativistic mechanics fails.

In 2012, there was the discovery of the Higgs boson which made headline news worldwide. Then, very recently, we have the big news about the detection of gravitational waves. If it is confirmed that E=mc² is wrong, it would not just be headline news, it would mean the world of physics going belly-up! The related physics of E=mc² is the very foundation of high energy physics which is what the most advanced physics research laboratories are using for their calculations - imagine all their work for the past 100 years being rejected overnight. I would not be surprised if people do not have much confidence in my discovery as E=mc² being wrong has unimaginable implications in the world of physics.

I'll just quote from my website:

E=mc2 Wrong

"The Relativistic Mechanics of E=mc ² Fails":

[14 pages; anyone who understands Newton's second law would understand the paper easily]

Abstract. The relativistic mechanics of contemporary physics does not have a defined unit of force. The newton, the SI unit of force, may not be used in any of the relativistic formulas; it is a real unit of force only with Newtonian mechanics which observes Newton's second law of motion as an axiom defining a unit of force as mass x acceleration. Without a unit of force, the application of the work-energy theorem (work=force x distance) produces only a formula that evaluates only to a pure number which has no association with any real unit of energy. All values of energy from relativistic mechanics are, therefore, fictitious (the kinetic energy may only be calculated with the old classical KE= 1/2 mv²).

...

At the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) of CERN where protons are propelled to near the speed of light, the purported energy of the relativistic protons is 6.5 TeV (10¹² electron volts), but the real value is only 470 MeV (10⁶ electron volts) - the reported energy being inflated by a factor of 15,000."

My discovery seems corroborated by the Chinese. In 2009, Chinese physicists who are members of the Chinese Academy of Sciences measured energy through direct calorimetry (energy to heat) and their experiment conclusively repudiated the relativistic energy of special relativity. They concluded that the 7 TeV (10¹² electron volts) of energy purportedly acquired by protons in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) of CERN have only real energy of about 650 MeV (10⁶ electron volts), off by a factor of 10,000 – practically the same as what my new theoretical discovery concludes.

Best regards,

Chan Rasjid.