What's new

Hehehe fun!!

SalaryMan

先輩
1 Sep 2003
71
0
16
Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.

I gave this to my wife to read ( native japanese ) and she could read without a problem. Weird how our brains work huh?
 
Taht is ralely itnresietng. :) But I take it this works for native or near-native level users of English? Surely you have to have some familiarity whith how the word is supposed to look (like how many times a letter stands above or goes below the main body of a word)? I wulod be inertsted in rdaenig the reearsch.
 
My wife is of TOEIC level 810 or something around that .. but because she has been with me since 1991 I'm sure her conversational level is above that.
 
Iltnsegnetiry I'm sdutynig tihs crsrootaivnel pnoheenmon at the Dptmnearet of Liuniigctss at Absytrytewh Uivsreitny and my exartrnairdoy doisiervecs waleoetderhlhy cndairotct the picsbeliud fdnngiis rrgdinaeg the rtlvaeie dfuictlify of ialtnstny ttalrisanng steennces. My rsceeerhars deplveeod a cnionevent ctnoiaptorn at hnasoa/tw.nartswdbvweos/utrtep:k./il taht dosnatterems that the hhpsteyios uuiqelny wrtaarns criieltidby if the aoussmpitn that the prreoecandpne of your wrods is not eendetxd is uueniqtolnabse. Aoilegpos for aidnoptg a cdocianorttry vwpiienot but, ttoheliacrley spkeaing, lgitehnneng the words can mnartafucue an iocnuurgons samenttet that is vlrtiauly isbpilechmoenrne.

Or, if you prefer...

Interestingly I'm studying this controversial phenomenon at the Department of Linguistics at Aberystwyth University and my extraordinary discoveries wholeheartedly contradict the publicised findings regarding the relative difficulty of instantly translating sentences. My researchers developed a convenient contraption at http://www.aardvarkbusiness.net/tool that demonstrates that the hypothesis uniquely warrants credibility if the assumption that the preponderance of your words is not extended is unquestionable. Apologies for adopting a contradictory viewpoint but, theoretically speaking, lengthening the words can manufacture an incongruous statement that is virtually incomprehensible. :)
 
You konw it took me a mniute to fgiure out taht the ltters wre in the worng order. I wrte like taht aolt. supposedly I'm a bit dislexic. For me, it's easy to read that. I write things backwards and can't figure out what is wrong with the word. ^__^
 
Back
Top Bottom