What's new

17-Article Constitution

Trollhattan

Swedish town of trolls
17 May 2009
102
1
28
The 十七条憲法 enacted in 604 AD,was it actually calligraphed on a document ( where is the original copy now ? ) or hand recorded in Nihon Shoki ?

TIA
 
The ツ十ナスツオツ湘ーナ停?コ窶邸 enacted in 604 AD,was it actually calligraphed on a document ( where is the original copy now ? ) or hand recorded in Nihon Shoki ?

TIA

It was calligraphed on a document, but the original or its manuscript do not exist any more.
Entire text quoted in 窶愿コ窶怒ツ鞘?倪?ケI is the oldest record of the constitution.
 
聖徳太子の書いた十七条憲法の原書が法隆寺に残されていると噂されているらしいが、真偽の程は不明である。

There is no proof that 法隆寺 had the original documentation of Prince Shotoku's 十七条憲法 ?!
 
ツ青ケ窶慊ソ窶伉セナスq窶堙個鞘?倪?堋「窶堋スツ十ナスツオツ湘ーナ停?コ窶邸窶堙固陳エツ鞘?倪?堋ェ窶邸窶板イナス窶コ窶堙嫁スc窶堋ウ窶堙ェ窶堙??堋「窶堙ゥ窶堙??ー\窶堋ウ窶堙ェ窶堙??堋「窶堙ゥ窶堙ァ窶堋オ窶堋「窶堋ェツ、ツ真窶ケU窶堙娯?凖カ窶堙坂?「s窶督セ窶堙??堋?窶堙ゥツ。
There is no proof that 窶邸窶板イナス窶コ had the original documentation of Prince Shotoku's ツ十ナスツオツ湘ーナ停?コ窶邸 ?!
Probably the source of the sentence
http://www2t.biglobe.ne.jp/~cherimo/history/syotoku/17jou_kenpou.html

The writer wrote "it seems unbelievable that ツ青ケ窶慊ソ窶伉セナスq made ツ十ナスツオツ湘ーナ停?コ窶邸" in the site.
ヒ?按湘」窶堙娯?堙ヲ窶堋、窶堙按焦?ナ陳ゥ窶堙「ナスjナステ?窶堙ーツ考窶堋ヲツ坂?。窶堙ュ窶堋ケ窶堙ゥ窶堙?、ツ十ナスツオツ湘ーナ停?コ窶邸窶堙坂?堙??堋、窶堙「窶堙ァ窶伉セナスqツ・窶ーXナ津仰皇ナスq窶堙個催ャ窶堙??堙債信窶堋カ窶堋ェ窶堋ス窶堋「ツ。
 
Unfortunately, the 17-Article Constitution is only quoted in sources compiled 100+ years later (based upon records lost in the Jinshin no Ran 672CE). There has even been a section of academia who have even questioned the very existence of Shotoku (although this view isn't commonly held within Japan).
 
Back
Top Bottom