What's new

U.S. defectors

Joined
Apr 15, 2002
Messages
1,571
Ratings
12
Mysterious situations will start to pop more and more I bet. I don't think that this guy deserted though. Just doesn't seem to be the way that many defectors would normally take. I bet "Super's" situation was just a super cover up to avoid hassles and what not with dealing with a stinky situation in the North. Just so much easier to label the poor guy as a defector than try to get him back at the time.
 

thomas

Unswerving cyclist
Admin
Joined
Mar 14, 2002
Messages
8,771
Ratings
1 762
You're probably right. He was caught during a border patrol and forced to feel at home. Nevertheless, he'd be facing courtmartial once he decides to leave NK...
 
Joined
Apr 15, 2002
Messages
1,571
Ratings
12
Even if he does. He'll probrably face court martial that will favor on his side due to lack or evidence or some other useful technique.
 

thomas

Unswerving cyclist
Admin
Joined
Mar 14, 2002
Messages
8,771
Ratings
1 762
Originally posted by moyashi
Even if he does. He'll probrably face court martial that will favor on his side due to lack or evidence or some other useful technique.
Lack of evidence? Would you trust in military jurisprudence? In times like this? Hell, I'd rather enjoy the rest of my life at some North Korean seaside resort for socialist heroes of labour.
:)
 
Joined
Apr 15, 2002
Messages
1,571
Ratings
12
trust? Ahhh, I was thinking that the US military would try to root him out and force (ahem ... help) him come home.

True, I would trust the military if the guy were legit and they were claiming he was a defector.
 

thomas

Unswerving cyclist
Admin
Joined
Mar 14, 2002
Messages
8,771
Ratings
1 762
How long can they actually indict him if they decide to nail him for defection? Doesn't his case fall under any statute of limitation (after nearly 40 years have passed)?
 
Joined
Apr 15, 2002
Messages
1,571
Ratings
12
I'm pretty sure that the law for normal situations is 20 years, but this is military law here so I really don't know.

The US should be helping and not hampering this situation.
 

thomas

Unswerving cyclist
Admin
Joined
Mar 14, 2002
Messages
8,771
Ratings
1 762
I agree. Probably they'd just put on a show, some sabre-rattling to eventually acquit him "due to his medical constitution". It's about keeping their face.
 
Top